Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:7 E- v) F) i7 ]: ?

" h* W9 o. Z  X4 a5 y) }8 A) b0 j4 _5 f! P& {7 D
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! Y0 D3 _4 _, t. }* E

- h  i" o9 K9 z, ^6 R5 \In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- D  A7 e! @% E; T& X6 h; L
' E0 {7 b1 S: g
# t: s& n* _/ E3 [& B! t
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 t5 N6 E- [/ e$ l9 m8 o% t8 M. h0 a

  k  L" G% `/ ^  t! E/ {9 q% K  Noh really...
, c5 C: {9 f% v/ n3 |hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
) W/ q. d) F3 @( ni didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題! J$ ^- e& Z4 C( T

0 l0 x! v# |) S9 X8 q; N; w/ Y# r當然這是個假設性問題! N$ y/ w$ j( C( h
但將人數倍大
& X$ c' E1 z8 \! c; \9 a" G2 o6 H+ }例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個9 s' x; j/ U" O
(情況可以換作其他)7 U$ @/ j4 Q- p1 V6 W& C1 W# e
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
9 h, _* }, W0 u! X8 y- q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...9 b# i- B& q4 a. ^
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:. k& A& D$ u* B3 P1 }
絕情谷既問題...
5 L( w  {1 {0 D, p如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
$ H$ P# \( P) [, Q+ k如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: z# p7 q: @/ B& }! N2 L! ]殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
7 H0 Y& p9 Y8 I4 t% u# N於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生, f7 n4 _5 h6 w8 _; L1 v
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
: c$ V. K3 J) A% X: X6 a+ q好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢0 v1 V( v, L1 J7 [3 S: U
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢# c, U* j2 p: N. V! {" C

, v4 N$ Y' k% J8 j5 K- K我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命7 n6 C$ l7 l0 a: i! k$ t
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:6 m1 L" L2 W6 {* L
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

* \/ }% g* g: K6 T
: N: Y" O) t2 _3 C% M0 }* T0 Ehaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣1 s( x6 p4 x9 C: B
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
' A" d9 O7 E( Z- g* h9 J& ?! b
1 H7 a! K: t1 Z6 {p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
" P9 u, a4 u& v2 X! a' ~4 ]2 iyes, my reason is helping more
% f0 H( g" E' U# tfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
  K; `4 |$ T. P' o$ f7 wif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child+ h1 L9 j; _) ]
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
, j: Q9 l" W1 m8 f0 ^: h' halso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!- v3 K( E2 P$ [1 D5 N$ l: L$ I4 d
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!# n4 T; g) o! s( p1 k3 X2 V
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
, g7 i# {' Q- \  P  E當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~( B# W* K7 a8 T1 b9 q
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
# Z8 Y6 D0 j8 N$ W& H正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
) }% [( C  `& G6 ~, c8 q即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
" s5 S3 g$ t/ k5 J5 }我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~; L: N9 H7 o& y8 F1 `. f# O9 _7 ~
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
+ E2 H0 w# V) k# y% ]我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）