Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
- J& s6 }: X& \0 z9 ~) I3 M2 G. b" ?' j! f
  Y9 G1 D4 P3 i: k
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! u2 }6 q4 d! U3 b
2 G1 @% w( d! }! X) n+ q1 ~
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:7 B; G8 @" [- M! L3 e0 e& h! O. }
) Y, [- L; X2 j% x$ T& t) b! ?
$ l; c* [5 {5 A' ~
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

+ V% H/ u% c* C: y# ]+ B

* H/ f0 p9 h! n5 h% y3 boh really...  d. f* ?+ x& c: T
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
1 B  r2 j0 P7 P- _i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
& j* s5 G( r. {7 k7 J: p+ Z5 l+ n. s$ D# Q  L% K- R
當然這是個假設性問題( P5 U3 H) U7 r0 {) h5 R% `
但將人數倍大
  ~5 L8 D/ c0 D- Z' L. ^例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
8 O) d/ D' k/ [% l( Y/ k2 G& y(情況可以換作其他)% K0 g* |  J2 U6 M  K6 k  {! j
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
: v( B0 p( l2 M4 Y6 p! A如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...5 }7 |* i5 Y, [$ P4 w; `9 X6 G, F6 c
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
; q- Q9 v8 |/ b( m絕情谷既問題...
8 U; X! E5 ]& g4 U# F7 ^如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...8 ~: T% ?- W+ m
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

! t2 i- B3 {& x6 s: _8 h9 Y殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好2 x9 P  v( o% X$ S+ f) V) ~
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
& Y# \& }' j0 M6 Z; D但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩. K0 x/ l. G2 e0 G3 S
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢5 p! {, r7 N  a* ]/ c9 k# P
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
* \" L9 i' U; P' j- T/ _1 o4 U( S/ s% ?/ n4 {8 b5 b% S4 {
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
* ?: d3 x3 g5 T/ Q. A不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
) B8 }) O, M3 b5 u其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

5 l0 u) L: `; ^+ u( ^

( d' k; ?1 e( `, Lhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣0 H% _6 R3 ~) u, ?9 s
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....- \- Y8 j4 y  _1 c' X1 q
5 l6 N3 N' M+ k
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 Z* A' r& z6 g/ myes, my reason is helping more
( b9 i) S' u9 K) ]# y% z, o0 Pfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!% R5 A0 E/ P" M. p* L5 `. Q# V
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
- ?; W$ [/ F8 `+ u2 E& ~* kbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
' i7 a$ [6 I! [1 i2 M# |7 m" C8 P3 _also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
0 ]6 K5 H1 k' Q# `! D) Omay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!. @8 H( t  k- N& E3 e
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
- k6 o' D* k: y9 m$ [4 u當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
5 I, K8 `) f# o% Q, D/ X0 O" _我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
5 I5 @1 Q3 m' Y1 }5 y2 k' w正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
" C/ k- D: V. w即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~5 P( {6 a" e; x* Y5 c
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~0 I( G7 K. A# \, c5 R# H& O
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~! g2 u0 b& ?6 ~  J2 X
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）