Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:; S% @. o; V# a1 ]1 z, {* ?
0 L9 T/ x, z$ z- t# d, N( C

" I! ^7 S  I/ N4 J7 [: |0 H我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' R' ?1 J" n% n5 G8 S
; g3 S0 j4 c6 V7 D+ |In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:; E7 V) \2 w" `3 O6 f

9 E) |: q0 F0 X2 f: N; t1 W) e3 m* v: S( }( i
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

( N- x7 f  M" h5 i! A

2 L- [! Z/ b5 P) ], ?oh really...
  t  J- v# l6 j0 j# R0 s2 |hahhaa, thx a lot^^"% S" [  u6 |( u; ]; H- q4 B
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題' F5 V$ A( l1 q5 l$ }* {% b7 F3 Y+ v

9 M% Y/ H3 N. @1 l* `當然這是個假設性問題
8 R: R2 \& n* |2 o' [2 U但將人數倍大2 E  i' |; y+ e2 i$ ]
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個. R+ \7 l' L( ^. t( j3 y8 Y
(情況可以換作其他)2 M1 B5 R. B1 `! K4 R" Q9 E9 @
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
1 x$ G( v7 z! U) M: T, b6 q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, k& ~3 _8 q, U' S( p4 v如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
- r  U1 k; q1 M+ M( s絕情谷既問題...  X4 w! h4 `) k
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
" u* _, u  \8 U0 A) ~- p如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

; p+ q  k# q% @" x; O殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好. s2 z! }4 J- ~' r
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
# O& y6 f9 t6 m' T8 v# i但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
6 I3 H9 V5 m. k' Q好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
, M& {1 [" _. [3 |其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
$ H2 C( q6 C+ D) S% J" o) p0 x$ m8 ~* }, p% E
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
. F8 A3 b' n! ^7 |7 D# X不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:/ T5 h! D8 k$ J% \. k. e7 K3 K
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

, R8 }( ~4 d$ }$ ?( u( M8 \

1 B7 J3 g9 _4 s' y( whaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
5 g) e) Q, L& M8 T% V你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
6 j( R: }' O. r3 b9 v' z/ R( Z# p% O4 S. @4 ^
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
5 {7 x! G9 b4 Dyes, my reason is helping more
) C8 E* d: p/ h9 [7 dfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 J7 S3 v2 m3 V; [if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
. A9 G1 N$ ~' P3 B  c3 ?because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
' D0 w3 @9 j; Ualso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
1 U. `* m2 D+ N& K2 N8 a5 ~( a5 rmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!1 e' a) {$ }& `- X) e7 w! @# g: ?( K
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
* ?+ b/ @( a. f當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
0 p+ \: i8 N7 T" d9 [& C) A我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~! m! o# p/ e8 I, c2 w) i7 \9 L5 J! R
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
& f5 q1 \- ^9 X0 f# s4 B1 G即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~6 `! x; d. r" Q- h7 b5 d
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~0 i1 l0 v0 I; _. y. A
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~- o6 U6 b' u0 c. L' P3 x9 {
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）