Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
6 d( R$ j  e( O2 G" L# t
6 H- j$ ?8 A: e9 V( X' i% t% q! i2 d+ Q
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

7 |* H2 c) c) J8 v% x/ h! ~5 [3 Q" [  a7 ^" j( U& h
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:( ~8 W' L% K2 A5 ]% ^0 g! M
7 @' D2 y, W3 s: L; s$ ?

3 G! r( m, J- ^2 V( aIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

. w' P: k6 x; d: _+ C
- m! J( U4 r# o7 p3 m
oh really...
* m- J* q9 i0 g: T0 uhahhaa, thx a lot^^"5 S) R0 k/ y2 N& w: ~/ t
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
$ V2 D! s4 {* z4 t4 h
% I' ]8 J& b7 e, ]$ I當然這是個假設性問題9 ?% \7 R9 c: h; B2 e. M: p
但將人數倍大2 `* h) e1 a$ T7 j9 W5 z% f
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
1 M& C1 o9 Z7 Z6 M(情況可以換作其他): i' a* U. m6 D9 S. u$ a
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
3 |/ \* a8 A( w如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ r: Z/ d8 b* W" G( Z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:( F/ I+ v2 X, u8 V% S+ P9 K+ C
絕情谷既問題...2 a4 D8 A2 \* v$ O, d3 f9 u% U
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
2 I. r0 a" S# R. [; b如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

) K4 ^* d# X* N+ }( x$ B
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
! _$ U( q) f% A* M  C! O* l3 f# X於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生% I4 E4 d: b. Y' [
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩7 L) L8 @0 J- H% s$ |. a" v, C
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
2 s! w; O! j4 s: l% w其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢+ P! Z8 Y" J$ x

5 W8 D" A6 m: M# F  y5 v我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命% k, k3 A6 c; p1 Z4 f
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
" u: Y& j; y6 _% h其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

5 s; m5 S9 p7 {3 G' `2 o
) _" ~7 Z, `$ e: `+ {4 ahaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
7 o; ^; Z0 `. e3 x' D, k你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...., j( z! S3 X* Y1 [9 o* X( c

  R) ^- _2 L) c$ up.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
! W, y% |: ~" z7 `yes, my reason is helping more
8 L" H: L; {: A! {for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!) O' g" v# }- z, T. Z; S$ E
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child6 ^5 a- ]& D. N; T! _' \3 q
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
% x$ |4 V+ x( m& d7 @also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!8 @3 v4 B' e; ~
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
; z  L, a' M5 f# Cunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~3 [6 d( a$ z" ]$ P, U) L
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
1 Z, B* S  k- P% U我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 G: k) [: T+ X5 t7 }
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
2 o$ M' j" B. g% M2 I即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~/ Z- v; H, V% \8 b2 i3 |. P9 W
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~/ E4 O) s* Q0 E( r5 [. E6 S: ^( |
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
4 I0 d$ ]0 u# W) G5 }% A我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）