Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
5 Y# V& M" l6 I
" Q9 i+ O/ M" P" P/ p8 B. D3 o+ f, H
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

- A6 y+ F0 A5 u0 ?# R% h
$ B0 b  ~8 P' B3 y# u
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
7 z9 N- m, [5 L: Z# P4 [7 G: B4 H, L" P7 a! p* }( {' n

" |/ C8 _( Y- \# c6 YIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 d! g  b2 d8 N% C) J3 t' h2 N8 u" O4 q" p) C
oh really...* d$ \! {( O8 t3 n
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
4 D- b- t/ I4 n* Y6 Y- S1 |i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
1 m0 V7 a7 f% p8 P& M1 U" c( H7 ~* C& B4 a; W, {. I3 d
當然這是個假設性問題% q+ q# r. U  d  s" p
但將人數倍大/ K4 B% G- r/ O" P0 j3 w4 x* _* |
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個" T& I# j! {' j; l, j
(情況可以換作其他)
# K$ e( y. P  H6 ~+ V. r始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
4 D1 t7 G, y- E. z9 ?7 e+ T如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
" P2 D1 Y* M0 F' w) n, X0 N如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:, n! ~) r. }8 v% W
絕情谷既問題...) C- U: |4 d( [9 V. G/ O8 \
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ S0 }# p! p( Q$ Y9 f' H' {+ j
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, t! x* i& c6 }& `% s) i% g
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
8 _# s5 E- ^( G. u* l/ a於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
# I, l$ p' q2 J+ \8 z) A但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
# R  r3 ]5 k( {! g, }" x3 t. M好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢, X; h6 _2 D) |4 ]& x
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢" R% R/ \1 s3 ?( V4 e$ n  e

9 v7 \" T" E0 f我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命( x" C& X! e$ M2 ~& y/ H
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:, ~6 ?. W0 x2 C2 R- j% j
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 w; [; w" V2 w" a0 Y. s- m" X2 b5 w* |, d- u- z
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
2 p" x. z# J' I+ o" i你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
7 p5 E, ?+ F1 C. v4 L+ n& u$ r  W
0 |8 b% w& Z, L/ H# W5 O. D" [p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 W7 ]5 [- S. M) N) G* e' a; {yes, my reason is helping more; r6 M4 \+ c8 ?; y- _. E6 W1 v
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
& B/ ~) b* y6 t6 Mif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
9 D/ Y- Y3 e, F8 K3 b! t& X; T7 ibecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
% d/ b2 W1 Z' f: Z) T" b( I) k5 walso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!# G# V# H% C2 ^2 y$ K/ \  q6 O
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!% u' R% c3 ?, s: f9 \
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~) j& c, H3 q) ]- p
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
" ]$ f1 h( J& W4 e+ C我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! e) H- I0 u" r( O2 Z正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
! d9 K, i- K6 K8 _: V即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~. C6 C  Z# Y; l+ t
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
; g- G2 V' t/ t8 c( a; N. S但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
% |  P  }8 }& O4 ?9 P* w+ b我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）