Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:# Y; s$ X/ I, l3 w8 S
& r- M/ _8 D% k/ [/ M
( p; ~+ ?7 ]. x. l9 I
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

8 f# Z1 q6 R" n( x3 H( C, U& d5 B5 v" U4 y- C
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:7 e) E; [- d% N" [2 u- [3 N: C
5 U( S3 B' m# d( i4 x

7 k( J7 n& |$ Y& t/ GIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

) H* H5 Q( }- @9 y1 }$ ^% P, k7 a" J" t/ X5 J( D
oh really...
+ N2 V% ]( Y- p; Vhahhaa, thx a lot^^"+ O( E% K0 F7 G( x
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
: U) j( C5 Z$ b! |6 M7 h
, x* H, ]/ i! f* n; Q# p當然這是個假設性問題1 K/ [6 B/ S( J, i! n# x+ k: g" q
但將人數倍大1 b4 S2 p5 S' ~7 w9 m  b
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
, K6 d! w4 s: |9 t2 D* ?( Z(情況可以換作其他)" J# J# Q  g- a8 Z% a2 p. M( g; b
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...* O! e1 K1 B* @( j7 ~
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
, @  G, o  j1 A% Q7 U0 m如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
2 v! E& m+ m8 Y; j絕情谷既問題...
2 [% e8 d' b( c8 u4 k, p& j- k如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..., Y- l3 o( a6 n' C
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

$ V. b2 o2 |' G& e+ M, i殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好" c) r/ ]; \$ D- w8 I
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生7 s3 Y) N6 S+ v, F
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩$ x3 Z: j+ Z: p8 a- l$ p$ R2 b% Z8 }
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢3 A7 M0 U! R# r7 o$ m# ?* \" i
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢; U7 A$ v- ?! a$ Y

9 B4 U. j, v, t我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命. X% e- P9 i7 D! ^
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:: d9 J. i) _: ]6 P0 O
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( _7 u0 A  P2 ?3 A' I; x2 M
+ Y5 d/ A4 a% k4 t# ?$ P! U* rhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
" [+ f0 O6 W& X1 v# h7 Y你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
2 \9 f! k- H) E" E/ H1 o+ T7 I( |9 ^/ N0 b4 \, `! V  B. ]
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
8 E( F- ?9 K  l  F$ ]% ^yes, my reason is helping more
$ E, h; I8 N  d- Q9 |for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
: M# w' i' G/ M- uif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child7 z; O( L" f9 D5 V/ A
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
' r* a2 s3 h  Q1 `. @" F: Galso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!* z! {9 d; `) P3 O+ p& w& r
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
: Z6 V/ z5 S" H$ L( Runder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~; U) V4 W5 _5 i' n& o
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
. t2 E" n  o6 V  ^) Z我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~  n& T. i7 g. a9 W
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
5 M- O/ Y! |6 ]* |/ V即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
7 G4 a# l9 H( k( U, e+ _; @: \& o我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
2 f7 y& L4 K) b% i3 m但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
: B( w  _1 U. y我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）