Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
0 n9 }: p8 _  E6 i0 Z( X* B9 i/ a) \, E3 f6 o9 ^$ d. P

  X, N6 S6 ]+ V5 X  h我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

" l& z; `, W- R7 a' `9 U, j7 l8 }2 f( v/ l. H& f
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
  v% H, N  t/ A' ]4 z& f( V0 m( u) L2 w7 ^7 V
9 K$ [0 V: M8 N/ a
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! F6 S- n6 l  G( u$ I
8 d8 _4 x9 q9 X0 x
oh really...
3 d3 `! {$ ~  M+ N1 Ahahhaa, thx a lot^^"- _# k; l" l* ]/ u
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題" K, c8 K  k% g' z) j0 u

  f+ B8 F" c" b# z6 G7 U9 q; e4 \1 W當然這是個假設性問題( A/ p0 `- ?( P0 ]$ x
但將人數倍大
9 a# o7 `. P1 ~! Z3 O' {例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個. M# n9 V, T1 Y2 C  t$ \9 q2 d
(情況可以換作其他)
% {  }: q* o2 q始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...& g: o; y" T1 Z" W6 N
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
- a' |/ [5 L, @( J- x  G如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
: }9 V/ l8 u3 G- i絕情谷既問題...
3 U: T- i% E* Y( a9 M2 U如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...! Z. I' q" Q2 ~* T/ H
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% U1 O; M: `/ x- X& X殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
% z9 \4 Q. h1 D# T9 ?& |於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
4 a9 h8 [7 E6 \$ a! W6 T但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩$ ]) K! n: `5 J* i; s
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
2 o! ]3 c3 S0 l, }: w0 s其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢. X! ^2 }1 a4 A* {1 X2 ~: |  w7 ^

9 i/ c3 |, D, l( U' ~* ^我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命# _  t0 {* K1 K, n, x
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:( Z6 ^/ l2 U; n8 b8 G8 [
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

/ }- e8 i- {3 }$ G
- w- V2 k7 x, p
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
. A) }$ }4 O( V5 c* Q你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....' ~4 Z+ H. W, V) Y1 ]2 I
0 V8 u  N1 S2 h
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child9 |7 @: p0 a+ k0 Q2 i; r
yes, my reason is helping more
+ Y" H& ?: u" `1 V/ Jfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
" K8 C. {. K2 _( Z. pif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
8 w: E7 k) X* a/ Y# d7 q5 ybecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?# B  o/ a9 \" y( a% b1 ~
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
7 a" _3 J3 d8 U2 Imay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!; X5 k; F. K0 ~& y+ _2 }8 z- @
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
: U& p9 G4 v1 h  o7 w: p: r( v: V當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
6 i' Y: u8 U' Z* n我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! @$ G- j; o$ y% L' @6 m1 b6 I正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
+ W. y; I2 Q, b# F4 t8 d即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
% l' M- Z( }# L9 {( C我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~: I7 X7 V7 c% ?8 \( [
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
0 e' F0 T3 M3 E4 p6 b, m5 u我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）