Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:5 X  ]& n$ n1 ~* x" h
1 i5 `4 Q+ |& b3 N7 s
% f+ Q8 W" U8 {' V; i. Q4 V" e
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; ]5 w: E4 U. h& @
0 d: W1 e- T0 x4 B- x2 `7 w& ?- YIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:6 e/ R# u4 Q+ p7 _! y. m" O( R
) [. E* ?- l; N# g5 F4 B# f& p* o

% j% \# s1 n' e7 kIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& G9 ^$ A# w7 S( n+ r

, Y& W5 X# u7 v" y$ Uoh really...
0 h+ m0 @& G6 Mhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
, v' c2 a% {- r- e( t% _8 e0 Y. S* Vi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題' S" N3 L9 l% j  I
  y6 [, o; J- k! W! a
當然這是個假設性問題
' @3 T+ Y$ m. |! C* X% ^( b8 V但將人數倍大
9 P/ J7 w$ i8 @* i例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個; P6 e9 M* o& [9 A8 y+ I
(情況可以換作其他)
" q" }0 X- n; G0 i始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.... a' Q* Y- W! \& d" }$ }
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." h. K9 I* E; K, ^
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
( Q! M3 C4 A# l' e$ k絕情谷既問題...1 }" q* A; T' g: ?) |* ]4 Q$ u
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...8 m7 J. o7 M$ Z/ _8 H3 I7 A
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: B# u. l) j4 O+ l殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好" j9 d3 ~$ m# C- [: [; x+ [9 ]
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生4 }4 J) M9 J# q/ }+ Q+ I
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩# l" }, Q: s4 O% C5 F, ~, i2 R! X
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
! C+ l* r/ `& Y( k/ S! [3 [( m% ^其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢: i+ G' m; a" R; |# v0 T3 ]
/ c( A4 X1 T" L* N
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命% X+ i, x4 H6 v$ L
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
2 I' k/ o# r5 O- t1 b! t1 Q$ E( h其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

; a5 N8 d  T( z1 ^' g1 B

; f$ n3 `% }9 L, q$ B; Shaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
4 C% F, g, u, P) i8 p你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
7 R0 G+ o% ]7 w, I, G& V) P" `
, o' x. H2 r0 J+ pp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child# F- O9 |7 Y/ d3 z' `. c2 H
yes, my reason is helping more
' u' }" p6 d+ {* ]for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
6 V0 a+ Q2 k, `3 p. M5 P2 I5 uif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
7 M8 B5 E/ ]# g! Zbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?( c" I# e8 j1 ?  w
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!# t7 p( G' a' n; U8 B, y  w
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
# S( `6 Y; R: ?; B0 Uunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~$ y2 E+ }" Z( _1 t3 g( ^2 E
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
( X6 ^0 M# \; i5 h1 o- l我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~8 L9 P, T$ w- G" Q  j  p
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
, W( V. ?* @- @4 V即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
! b, }$ k( U1 y6 ?2 `我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
( ~' S: p) b5 [3 L但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
- [  _+ l3 l. K9 B# M& R" [我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）