Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:
各位brother
0 j; y2 ^* b( _6 F6 L' @
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:0 h: s3 i, | r/ ^
! z# _' R! d) k+ e8 X, Z' Z% A
一個市場有幾多個廁格?! n- _, J) X7 y, E5 e
' R7 O2 ~- |4 G/ }$ i% R( s V
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:8 k9 `" [1 E+ y/ S6 O5 S
$ U B" M# O; P+ S5 e
# R5 [" B" j$ n5 C7 T4 f0 z
好認同 !!!
good point !8 V% G2 g! I/ F8 Y1 P7 G$ g
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:* c' e: M' k; B) u3 {* b, T
) D8 e9 K5 T5 o8 X; q4 @
一個市場有幾多個廁格?3 n& y5 O. I& C9 T6 G
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
$ U) U5 A1 s" o& ?, \* i
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?, J0 Q( |3 [% h% x1 \8 `
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?& {: z. H5 O) B' r3 _
5 o4 ?0 P% ?7 h9 U+ r% W+ ~
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:2 J& F4 @0 o( k8 w
" M/ }! x/ K: r
$ m$ v0 x1 e# n) U( w: [9 d8 F
, C) F$ l9 P5 H4 ]9 n
出猫并唔係刑事的
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:
講真! v% i. N8 x/ p# K. b" ]: p1 M
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦" v" W& k0 e( Q
點解要出猫呢; L4 ^6 h5 A5 M. ?7 `1 \3 Z6 `
出左,又唔一定會合格
有機會佢d答案錯既
你有可能會唔合格tim- e& r- c" f+ k( E6 o
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢3 y+ j0 C; s* E/ R* h' g
咁都會有個網有d會考資料$ z2 U" P0 O# M: E
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:! T1 y0 M6 F3 X! M: M; q
* `( D1 u7 |, P
3 u7 x9 z% G4 O5 N0 J1 c5 m
考題係抄個網的
考評局懶Q到照出1 w% L! |& d' r! o0 K
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:* \$ s6 e9 N8 b% L3 x# [ ]
% u% q0 e: @( i
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:( w* H* Q+ t: _1 V6 o
刑事係要舉證的: ~) E* b% a& d
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
# o6 w/ y, V; l+ o) c1 E" P
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:6 I2 i* Y! z c |9 C
8 F M: p; Q0 J3 L
你當香港冇王管咩, C2 {" C5 _* p; V
唔係刑事9 _) Q- H; r2 E* s
你點申請法庭手令呀
責任係考評局度7 e0 E! ^0 Z7 e' O0 q
要查IP呢D野8 j8 w7 p7 D1 x' t4 [6 c
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
! i l* X' d: r" D3 y
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve,
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左: V4 \5 }/ {# L- d
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:( T, \+ a( N ^4 `4 s" D% c' [: Z
9 ~; ]2 N/ G) L2 k# B% J: ^
6 F3 P( Y" C, b" N; O
取消得一係就+曬 e0 r+ @* D+ G2 V
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:1 Y& ~2 @( h6 \1 H# M! k
( F B5 k4 u# W
. Q6 e' e& n: V
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
a* t8 } n! \
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管4 i" C/ ^. z. |$ }8 z" @
" c7 X2 R* P0 ^' R
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??% U' m( \! S2 B: [
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:
* l# k- s3 z1 y0 }
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分* p' l& p# Z1 p1 w4 u t
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:. G. W3 G" ]# y' b. n7 |6 m
+ Z" |; G, Y! y6 ]" l
% f3 @+ ]# ?' C n
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法( \' u5 u( d+ ]
就係冇相關的
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案5 U& M: N( V0 u$ i' t, @$ J
0 W8 a. t: S; V0 E/ g; b# q. u
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:* m; ^# w C N, O3 A
( r& H# }( y! R% ~& u
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:7 S' \2 C+ p0 } b5 a; U
% y( ]" i* v2 N+ [
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例/ K; ?& ~0 W* _5 @
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法- p3 G/ a8 X0 V0 `9 |) V
' {' r% M r, m' L7 A
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:7 Q: J/ z( X) {: r+ _! h9 F
$ r* s! k8 H* ~5 S
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:
0 d, L1 ^9 ]" x* [$ ?% {
% ?1 z) o- I6 Q. k _6 {
我反反問
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:7 s4 Y, X# u z* g
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:
重唔重考唔重要
最緊要收到成績單之後# s/ ]0 Y# a D+ J- H$ L
唔好又走出黎話
唔公平要重考
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:! N$ D, o2 @+ ^- g9 n6 w
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇6 C, q9 A% a9 j9 L
有左對策
各位brother睇睇1 I8 c) o! j; }, R( U
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:% ?# ~; W) N0 f+ ?. S. W1 V
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇% _% i! H& J9 J: `$ ^
有左對策8 t1 p7 k6 O. J" U2 K1 z4 O
各位brother睇睇
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:7 f# a9 \$ s# j2 Z" d
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:$ k8 \; t6 B1 W) U8 ^4 l% Z% D
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:0 I7 v* Z7 @" }3 |1 i. ~- K
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:4 d. e, x0 @5 I- [
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:2 N5 a0 y1 }! r+ f
' C: }) {$ E& d5 P+ s
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:
i retake this year
i really dun...
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |