
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:6 B- f* N! R; L) e7 Q. L
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:2 }" v c/ c" D& Q2 c0 G" U" P
點解今時今日先會有投訴??4 @: t* p: ~* j. Z& }; M1 }( I& [
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM: q, u- a) P% m, ?$ V" M# B$ ~
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出 h+ J' a5 {# ?# x" e
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持5 G" w7 U6 l& T t1 P0 K6 v, V; g
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:, ^7 q2 ]* C, I# C) e* y' m
點解今時今日先會有投訴??: @$ }' z2 N2 R' n8 i1 }
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:* w, e6 F' B9 p
同意紅字哥part: r, k9 R' J' y+ [0 M1 c+ k+ \# m
# ^" l, l+ f0 H+ C `
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:" a1 ?7 D+ g( O$ A9 C
5 V5 }3 V6 q: B% n' l6 P
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:8 s+ c- Y: S' P& H+ t
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
1 j. Z7 u- D% [: h$ R; d* k
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
7 K- o+ r2 i, p
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
6 }# I9 F4 a. o& H6 ^
/ A- u, Y4 R C& d
同意紅字哥part
T L% G0 b$ b2 U6 p
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:2 J) z3 A" ~8 b( |2 v9 s
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
: _9 ~4 r/ w6 J2 F) [# \# L, c
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:: P" Z2 F7 b- F: w/ p
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:/ x# N7 @1 ]% l6 K3 b
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
6 Q; ?' p5 c8 i$ U$ ~
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。' T8 D' m; {9 q5 n. p& ^& F% {0 P! s
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
5 v1 r2 M6 F7 w! l' }
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:+ s# W* `+ o: U, ^9 E6 w
8 z5 o1 J' t* k; H: ?2 U1 \
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:) L/ l" u2 b; e8 r
" \ V6 T7 D- F3 t$ c
多謝讚賞 haha: X2 h# h- l, Q9 j! x$ Y# W
( o7 `* e# z2 H7 l1 E: B
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |