Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??, }( L( Z4 k" H7 {+ @
本野出左咁耐都冇既??, g# h/ f z7 Q J
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
1 q9 L8 ]' S& d& f( X
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身: y. Q B# d2 T3 S6 E3 s
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出3 g7 v. g& R" z" v+ H0 Z
現在有人帶頭發起提出( s3 @) M! C5 R8 a1 r( m2 R
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:; b$ A. @+ F- z; i
點解今時今日先會有投訴??6 F! Z% M$ C) @- H% T% K
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:% T1 P9 [$ C% j6 j' x# C! ^2 o/ m
) d9 P% G8 k D6 c
同意紅字哥part# X2 p# S) L6 Z4 S
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
6 w! q' q0 n+ o2 i( _* t
. ]4 m% }# _, Z& B V0 C
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:8 t# \2 f/ }5 n ^
' Q' V0 `+ n! N9 R. B# o
8 m) x' E% k3 J! _
同意紅字哥part2 s& @2 M( y5 R% W; \: t$ ?* ]6 {' p
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:" P. I. x* i7 c& a- l4 O3 P; N" C
, t. e) ]6 Z4 E; x1 A% U: G
8 }: G, j; o: A0 _# m
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
9 n* u# c' e$ j4 c# {" \
" } ?# I+ o; i) f# R& P3 D
同意紅字哥part L& ]1 f R* h( y" Y0 @# Q6 n `% M5 G
! D1 X& f, j( Q: ]6 E% p
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
" ^ F' l# ]% `5 ~: X
* W! E. ^ r1 s! i
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:; C+ |: _' d# @2 K; J9 B4 O
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:! e$ G5 `5 g8 V" p: {% H) I. ?/ K3 b5 k
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:/ v, Y! P6 E, P% g) J N
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:9 W* I, G* c3 A5 r
3 l$ s2 U. Y4 z% ^9 C* `: q
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。1 S' k* I8 p U4 D0 w0 n, W
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:1 L s0 |6 G0 O) Y7 c
3 c6 H/ e9 {( A0 I1 \( J9 l7 n& w
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
7 W- h/ V# H/ C1 J1 E# |$ Z
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM: v k3 O$ u. q: {/ B9 q
& I1 y+ j- _8 u: g0 z
多謝讚賞 haha& K+ c' ~$ r9 {" Y" }
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |