
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:% ^4 _5 Q0 X9 _ c" u/ e4 m ?$ z7 W
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??. ~8 r8 D1 o) [0 m' r6 I
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:; U5 C( _8 J W
* p' }% E, R" m# W* b
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身( i$ `5 w. }4 S# ^. ^: t6 z
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出$ X: q: r$ q( Q
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持' A; q* v/ B3 T8 N
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM: F2 `# I9 i9 S( v( v
點解今時今日先會有投訴??% U7 F/ \3 y; N# n$ W2 Z$ K
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:! A( L" a8 X% @8 H
# C2 l1 ?) E3 t
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:1 ? m0 ^. w: u, O' ^
& |$ M6 \8 t- r
, S4 Q6 i7 E3 d6 \* u4 h
同意紅字哥part/ Q8 j* x$ C+ L
4 V- Z2 t* U) q' e* F
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:" k8 E/ E# I# @3 M" u
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
# A" d5 }9 B0 P! o& Y, G/ a
同意紅字哥part
* x/ ^3 Q+ `. j" V- t) B
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
' ^" V, j) y& Z5 ]$ M }7 g
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:/ ` @2 j8 ?. ]+ K
同意紅字哥part% N# x; \ b) ~$ p. O9 `
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:! P/ ^7 a6 Q/ {5 h7 ^# J$ \
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:4 i$ g- s4 ^- Y9 j8 W# T" F/ R0 p$ K
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:" `; l" \% k7 w" | l
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:% e% X1 b9 [( E
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:: N, g: r M+ {3 g# k4 O% G
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:4 Z8 \7 R5 e$ i! j- N
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:2 r, u2 \5 N% i' W; ~* P+ E
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。6 `* n! m) V7 w5 u0 O% E+ e) G
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
2 Y2 y8 S t! x8 _: Y
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
5 R7 o/ m: V) K/ B
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:% O& @0 j, U; R
4 ]4 P1 M- L! _6 Q+ U# E4 r& R# p" F1 V
: ^& m: z+ V$ O
多謝讚賞 haha3 U- }$ @" l# Z1 A3 r% e3 T
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |