Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:7 _( Q4 j# R& J: F/ P. C
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:5 q+ E3 J% x6 Y( u
" B# z. _9 `0 _. H4 M% h0 v2 C
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出" u+ b) T$ T8 n* P
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:/ {$ B0 ^* E( O/ ?) X3 m# s- |* M
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:% D/ n2 V/ Y3 s; Z% U
...唔係教徒不看..) d; T: z' v& @8 N- |
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
% l/ e8 J! _+ }$ c- A
U. |; t$ U8 l4 _0 g
同意紅字哥part
, |5 T0 K F' h4 A7 H' j0 l3 l2 S
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
: B! \9 L. B0 r$ T) B. u! T9 Z
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:8 |- Z. M) W) W
L/ B8 `* u) ` w; `& E; M# _; k, p
同意紅字哥part
1 h8 k, H+ F; E7 Z: G
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:+ T1 H* c) w1 a- Q4 j+ D
. G' S1 \0 o! `: w. D3 L+ ?; m
; _/ I0 G+ P% u/ S J5 m" \4 G# ^
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
Q+ r" s0 \ A5 x1 ~9 D n, `
同意紅字哥part4 U: A1 y7 @9 l9 l. w9 r; z
. d0 s: [* M, K* [
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
2 a( {) k+ E s- B' P. \
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:2 ~( o+ ~1 h1 P* }
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:+ r. K% M( O* F0 @) u
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:( s) P* [5 F" i# D
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。9 k& @* _. z# Q/ d
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
8 M8 R: x$ X; V) D6 v
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:7 r, r) n* a5 K. P% |* F
0 g* z" I6 e; v2 Q; Y. ]
多謝讚賞 haha" ?% v4 D5 q8 q* U
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |