
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:& ?! r5 M: Q# \: K/ A5 x9 O% E
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:" ?! M% B/ y, r/ q# D+ i
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
% o2 W( n( f$ s+ U0 e* }( N3 F
' s/ t$ A* j' x1 o
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出7 I: j- g/ y( h
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持4 k; @% b+ b5 m( }
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??0 k4 q; w4 i* h
本野出左咁耐都冇既??7 P7 f+ `! U1 k/ E) B- ~: f- U
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:* e5 g' u& Z F: P' Q) G
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
# V% ]/ ?6 q+ {: n5 ]
同意紅字哥part- S1 ?4 U3 k0 V1 \' B0 V
. Z1 N% ]$ X5 X# p/ U9 `
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
1 Q; T1 ~2 p/ p8 D/ G# @% K1 G
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
* Q! A; o: O3 W2 N3 Q+ j' X y
同意紅字哥part
1 E/ p9 _$ V8 L, ?/ S5 f
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:$ `# N8 I5 x: k4 U- }, V' d' Q
7 r/ ^* w1 m: F! {% ?) V9 l
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:/ G8 f% \) a* ^% s
' K( P5 e7 P6 U: i
2 C0 X+ e2 c4 e* w$ _- L T
同意紅字哥part4 |8 D+ p' f, S
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:% p; C/ F. M" }6 `1 r% u3 l& p: W
8 n4 h( v2 j* ?7 [
& `$ G4 K8 u, r* L
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:7 Z+ Z$ A# s/ [) I9 k; X
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:0 H5 Y+ Z$ K. B) u6 }7 m. s% y
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:, j- Y! r8 Y1 V1 F" K
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:4 U+ m& s+ T5 T N; t+ C! |+ d" f; M
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:; i: e4 O$ G- r$ Y
. f" @$ d4 n0 t/ }& V% W: |5 o
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
* }4 F9 o( p+ x) Y+ Q
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
2 v) H% R5 t5 {. Z. F3 R
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
3 e( w( U* J. Y% K0 [
多謝讚賞 haha
9 O5 N2 a: N8 W3 B
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了# H/ t1 M1 W7 K- ]8 y/ s. X2 [* ^* s
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |