Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??$ ^4 P% u4 S' G2 a( O4 q
本野出左咁耐都冇既??+ B8 n. f2 |( F$ a. N5 x
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
# f4 z) g8 u0 U1 Q8 d2 d
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身, i. i8 U7 S) e( k1 F6 X. N! r
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持# T1 A4 `- @6 p. {
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴?? j1 H$ N" s5 b* a% V& }5 Z" |
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:$ x! T3 X: K5 S2 n
...唔係教徒不看..9 B8 X3 c" _( b) g0 j/ K+ j; _
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:: F, z) D7 u" Q* Y3 K
同意紅字哥part/ v) n/ C/ U8 }
% p4 Y0 h) k/ F1 ?* Z. t
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:$ d! r9 N, Y, o# A
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:# i6 N6 R7 p7 d4 ^7 ?& A6 f
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:! \7 `' M, }4 O. H4 q3 S
- p. O! N A& J9 X" Y
同意紅字哥part' a" V' U; L" p. c4 Y
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:/ U: r& h( u8 r C/ d0 \
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:; F j+ r" e2 ^* B
$ d! q7 i1 w! n" x( @1 n
同意紅字哥part& R+ V$ P: @# b' u$ C1 E
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
1 o2 S6 e5 p# j
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:0 \/ Z9 }0 n1 C! P+ y$ p
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:9 D1 D# g* Q, s& W7 }8 G! z0 g
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:. _3 J1 U) b( m
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
; A7 E! K- w# V/ _2 e6 u" ]
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。$ }$ _, P' I" l1 J% H8 T
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
3 ^# ^1 A! r) f! [: }5 N
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:& P7 \* b# ^% R7 l
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:" E& H5 s, g! P1 _$ m, F/ I
! N8 l9 |. r' g* [- I8 p. c
多謝讚賞 haha
4 [ y' l$ C! [
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:9 \- @$ Z& V0 ^0 W. ~
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了. r- n$ v# f5 `3 }1 J+ g
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |