
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 17:57:
玩法:要搵出兇手/原因/殺人動機.........
Originally posted by QuiGonJinn at 2007-6-2 09:37 PM:
" D/ U5 |1 [$ Y2 d3 m* x
Q門Playbr2氏,請問..................依家邊個死咗???????????

(新人除外)Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 00:01:& N! T1 u# A6 L: ]! `( A6 D* q
) H# L+ E/ o" a
玩左咁耐.....乜仲有人會咁白痴睇ed野(新人除外)
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2007-6-3 11:44:
421王赫白都有嫌疑...因為"全身上下只用浴巾包了起來", 浴巾包的地方沒有被捜.
/ w5 N D4 d! GOriginally posted by head at 2007-6-3 12:01 PM:
, Z- i& }. e( s6 N4 v
8 J& r! z5 C1 A' E6 t/ D
) V- `! t" Z+ o
咁樣 洪...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 12:25 PM:
照你咁講,豈不是要將三人解剖...![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 04:28 PM:
我其實有一個問題?5 r% T* R( Q! G) ^" E* W2 }
點樣先可以攞晒15分啊??
好似part3咁......!我同個答案一無一樣(我解釋得比個正確答案仲清楚)都唔可以加15分???
Originally posted by 安心 at 2007-6-3 17:23:
想問呀~~芯片即係咩??
幾大到??
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 16:37:
$ [/ Q7 D$ m8 x6 p7 V( K
@.@ 一無一樣 !?! ......你指原版答案吓馬![]()


真係唔係好明
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
, ?. j$ o5 j" V" S6 s8 F) O
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
/ i* S- b) _! F: c& E% p
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 21:07:7 ~/ ]2 e( o# Y' G5 e/ M" I9 ^
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 20:50:7 f7 b4 S( B$ y: |8 U5 O+ J
7 ~' C. m9 t0 f0 w
原版答案過於簡單 , 而且缺乏很多...






Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 09:07 PM:
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM:
I2 W; T% K! ]" Y, p
明白晒
咁下次我打多d字啦![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 21:40:3 v" a2 }) Y' n9 c
D, I( O) g. F/ v0 S- W$ A
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点



. X5 w# F1 q0 M$ {9 k

(雖然我知道自己經已答對了)Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM: D7 A& j5 }. A) K H5 x
8 C& d" F8 K: Z1 B: g
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:, ]* [5 k9 {& F) g6 C! |# ^! z
2 h( r P; a; \# T9 p2 k. A7 y
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM:
從方位而言 , 艾佛利能見到 希瓦克。阿萊的背面 , 只有兩個可能 , a. 是 阿萊跟著兩個警察去追強盜時 , 艾佛利也跟從阿萊其後 , 但這時應該還沒駁火 , 就算一路逃跑一路駁火 , 阿萊都不可能背面中槍 . b. 是強盜伏擊兩個跑在最前的警察, 之後阿萊逃避強盜追殺時 , 給強盜射中背面 , 如果艾佛利是一直跟從阿萊其後 , 他應該知道阿萊不是強盜 , 他亦不該見到''正在反方向''逃走的阿萊背面中槍與否 , 除非艾佛利處身於強盜的位置 , 艾佛利有可能就是那強盜了
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 22:26:
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入...







Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-4 01:29 PM:- b7 ~: h+ r4 |2 D) z% `7 d
哦.........原來係咁: s* r. d% u9 z) e. ]3 o
88我個post唔係寸你啊,驚你吾會啊,你唔好啊
![]()
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-4 17:49:* A- C/ u( |( O
. Y0 L, z, ~7 a# \) d) F
冇嘢![]()


4 l6 w! F- W! s6 LOriginally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-11 08:26 PM:
playbr2 答案[/c...
Originally posted by AL力克 at 2007-6-11 09:20 PM:
0 M3 A' Z! I, F0 ^8 L1 B, ^2 Y$ F
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=296
#8869
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |