Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 17:57:7 t3 r) \, v' G f) a7 t O
玩法:要搵出兇手/原因/殺人動機.........
Originally posted by QuiGonJinn at 2007-6-2 09:37 PM:" J$ V5 Q% `1 w& q: a5 N& o' @1 X- z" ~
Q門Playbr2氏,請問..................依家邊個死咗???????????
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 00:01:
i- u4 t1 G8 e1 T4 z" S9 C+ u) O
玩左咁耐.....乜仲有人會咁白痴睇ed野(新人除外)
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2007-6-3 11:44:* x* ]0 j( a; E R K
421王赫白都有嫌疑...因為"全身上下只用浴巾包了起來", 浴巾包的地方沒有被捜.
Originally posted by head at 2007-6-3 12:01 PM:4 F: u( x) p/ E2 U7 `* C5 K
) }$ F( L* C4 ?, c8 K I2 g9 P
咁樣 洪...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 12:25 PM:
4 _' ~8 F2 z& r6 V- a. I
照你咁講,豈不是要將三人解剖...![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 04:28 PM:
我其實有一個問題?
點樣先可以攞晒15分啊??
好似part3咁......!我同個答案一無一樣(我解釋得比個正確答案仲清楚)都唔可以加15分???
Originally posted by 安心 at 2007-6-3 17:23:$ X+ J; w- g: Q) a
想問呀~~芯片即係咩??; a. F6 ` k3 Q* g7 L
幾大到??
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 16:37:% q# |3 t6 Z1 \# m
@.@ 一無一樣 !?! ......你指原版答案吓馬![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
5 ~! e9 t8 J7 G* Y
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
1 D ~7 \2 |7 t1 f
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:0 z H+ z0 i/ Y
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
* V) l! E2 Z4 O4 v# ~0 f, ]
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 21:07:
# Y5 I6 m) [# ?/ t$ B
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 20:50:
原版答案過於簡單 , 而且缺乏很多...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 09:07 PM:$ @6 A% [% Y8 ^. e# ^
5 u) o9 K3 l/ w$ t# _7 q
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM:+ V2 P1 {1 q" A$ _/ F. X& i
; ^/ `' f/ k+ ^9 S7 K- U
明白晒
咁下次我打多d字啦![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 21:40:
( O+ r: P3 f2 A+ x$ M6 r% I; t
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:- j- x& x5 f& p$ L
6 l! p7 x+ {- H# E8 g; i
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM:
從方位而言 , 艾佛利能見到 希瓦克。阿萊的背面 , 只有兩個可能 , a. 是 阿萊跟著兩個警察去追強盜時 , 艾佛利也跟從阿萊其後 , 但這時應該還沒駁火 , 就算一路逃跑一路駁火 , 阿萊都不可能背面中槍 . b. 是強盜伏擊兩個跑在最前的警察, 之後阿萊逃避強盜追殺時 , 給強盜射中背面 , 如果艾佛利是一直跟從阿萊其後 , 他應該知道阿萊不是強盜 , 他亦不該見到''正在反方向''逃走的阿萊背面中槍與否 , 除非艾佛利處身於強盜的位置 , 艾佛利有可能就是那強盜了
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 22:26:
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-4 01:29 PM:$ N. W1 [# i; J% p" x
) T* D' X( }2 J) R* h5 |* Z# f
哦.........原來係咁
88我個post唔係寸你啊,驚你吾會啊,你唔好啊
![]()
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-4 17:49:
% }, F& M0 S! b3 W
冇嘢![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-11 08:26 PM:3 U0 `0 m6 A( I; m
playbr2 答案[/c...
Originally posted by AL力克 at 2007-6-11 09:20 PM:
3 W c4 r0 ^1 K2 }& z$ H5 O% S
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=296
#8869
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |