Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:2 ?" x3 w& ^' ~' z2 h5 k
港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?; s1 S! F1 u7 u% m. Y; Z# A) j
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖: a, U4 i9 l: L5 Z! R
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:( w6 C5 q0 V  W

. `: M2 t; A! h9 s1 `2 J& R( e" [7 c% _6 ~
特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
0 V% v' W; m: m3 O
: f( H0 s8 C# q3 ?
- q9 `- ?9 z3 L: v之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
3 |$ g; S+ A" K+ [5 v5 f1 v) C7 f3 ]  C/ V, [; P6 e" c4 M! ~* j. p

2 P! i. ]: F8 o" b=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:8 P; t0 M& d5 R2 Y! o, I

4 v8 o; I& W  y: g- n7 y. h6 |如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
4 U+ t; m' L, w! A1 u
+ S- J) q9 g1 Q# M
: y1 i& d( O$ z9 O/ j+ W+ ^9 m1 J"如果"1 O% x( }  t. Q/ b$ c  o. x
: t/ D3 Z# B& Y5 Q$ D; J: S' m2 H2 P
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.