Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?
3 {* F' Z' a& u$ ?2 a: }之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
! E6 |3 u4 H5 E1 ~- v, J/ ~難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
) T' }! v4 j1 r. h8 @港台e排發生咩事呀?
1 Q$ k. H- Q; |2 x7 y% I5 O1 z之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
8 b( P4 g, I  ~( k" v- i難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
& K, P5 m) x+ [% @" w, l2 }% @3 \
4 a9 ^& t0 C( e特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:
8 f5 M, G4 i$ I3 \% V' i& W8 w; k- R8 X& y0 x
6 }8 c5 x0 Z+ g. w  d$ G8 q
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
4 ^2 K# R  A! a7 O9 T( T$ U* E+ a' F% c3 i9 z% w, }: N8 p+ Y/ z9 G
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:' t, e( Y  r8 Q8 k! |5 w1 v! \
0 y. f. a7 P4 z/ T3 G9 d& N

# I2 }7 J* U& [) g; H; p& f之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
7 }4 M  ~( c5 W& z3 m& n
7 }8 z- I' L4 `) X' ]7 }$ d2 q=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:8 {( q# d/ @: I
; i3 F! g" i1 ]' _# c9 ~( l% P

& u4 x& r4 A( F0 i, d=封港台?
$ w% K8 O8 `* F$ t- Z
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
' E: Q0 Z7 S3 G' h
' ~3 |1 a) Y) S  L$ C如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
# C. z. l1 M$ b- U$ J3 p
0 t/ |- |5 _! ^" Z/ _"如果"
* L, o7 F) M  ~; }1 Q1 k. J, ?
/ z( f. l1 F$ p7 V: D* f: w- c7 uthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
& m$ C' B; b/ F* _' D& x; O. D. B# E7 U0 r2 w/ z# A6 Z

" Y' q0 B' J  }" k: c"如果"
/ G" T" P  O. |2 Z1 P& _+ ?$ E7 i: Q0 @. o; O
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
5 e1 T) t5 X9 ~9 B+ ~想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言
0 g; p& [' w7 r本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。9 {+ K8 h0 H0 O+ S; [0 _

) r! S5 j, D/ L- e  l豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?
* I- J4 f. N' ?$ D
  S: c4 R' m( R6 W2 Z$ A當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。5 Z& S3 l9 J- ]+ K

9 Q0 N! e8 p8 a[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0