Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:% R1 ]. z* i* i; A' n( V
港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
; ^3 |3 k! B; h- r% q  D之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖: C( w& w/ g/ O$ U$ k4 ^
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:
6 ~/ d4 u2 S3 q  ~% Y7 j% n: A1 \
$ K  [8 ?; s9 m' v
5 G7 |* Z6 r( g! F/ f: Y特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:! Q  e5 ^/ N0 Q( \
1 A9 u6 d( i& T; S( @
  x, s, R* i3 y1 v, a! y
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
" x6 o5 w/ @, C4 N) }$ y: \
+ h0 m/ ?1 S1 J/ \: \3 G  t+ m+ P% n9 H0 o; S6 B6 q
=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:$ Q$ M0 n! c* C

) Z5 |. \$ e! m* S$ q如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:: W' D2 B2 U/ o6 M1 E' @1 o
9 s; c3 v* X! r& r& m3 N! j
6 h6 |9 v& |1 A/ }' m2 @0 w- c
"如果"6 c  z4 r  l1 S, u

9 `, ]1 s: J- bthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.