Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:4 N2 r, a; l/ a4 W( |
港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
+ W; t: A1 d8 F4 ?6 [7 ]之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
3 Y* ?0 P5 p, }8 J$ g4 E% S$ g難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:/ N! A& z4 }4 ]6 U7 H

* i0 V! j1 V# U/ E3 R8 E
& r9 X: S4 J+ m3 b8 b3 R特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:" W: U7 C+ g3 A! Z1 ?2 w2 {3 F) v

& [: h: k* u6 a, c0 m4 e% ?
; H2 \8 t3 b# z0 F之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:" E, ?! B2 q6 I' H, T
& F5 A) }/ r3 C& d4 t8 g
; K" h1 u8 X7 O5 l& P
=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:  O, ?" r* ~# m$ g- N

% C; r1 t  C$ e; F如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
! Y& T% u  K; n
! J2 {( _7 `2 l4 f+ j& J% [) J  x. L/ n: `. W8 Q) U
"如果"8 k6 N. W8 J, V' t" X$ \
) H6 Q  @4 z$ M; T0 ?
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.