if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！& Q$ X3 r* [3 e6 [" o
5 A0 |$ O0 b }" A' k' z, Z% M) C只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 . Y& @" J1 j( k# k; S# X不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 9 e- y! g+ M) { 2 j, d5 t% c4 d1 U# z強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ : |5 u" E2 r; K5 p * C9 q9 I$ s* y6 X* h1 i[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? - l5 P8 Y1 S* P- `% J8 a( x' H o5 k- ]! g
6 D( Q# ? j# `; DI have watched only several "疑似" 相片,, e0 C3 q* t" g+ R
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 6 k8 q0 {1 i8 n% q: [3 |' S: P6 U. G" Z& A2 w
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ]/ K7 O& K+ ^0 D; R) p W eOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.7 u0 y" p9 g0 ^3 R
Well, just my personal comments. 7 v* Z, J! h* j* _& d. P! J 8 U( e" e% e, Z: _Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
