版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題., Q" Y9 m" o. y
4 E& L6 h! l: ^+ }* e
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. / ^6 `, S! e" y* a7 l: q" i( m) v/ I( u/ W. V* N' j6 [
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ + n+ n$ P( }+ n" z% c& l7 m% o, e6 w4 V1 F1 a" y: e' X1 a) F& O5 E t
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 % R8 I" v% K( Y7 M. d不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照! }) _: M5 k1 _# G7 e/ p) u6 t
8 R( x# @/ @0 K
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！2 f8 y) x7 J4 D# j% K" V U
% o+ f; m" J8 P0 j T$ ^ a
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? * O& J7 V8 S! J, f" v& p* v
, Q( T1 ?$ ~- @- M% E7 x7 M7 t: C! Q: \. w% V/ t
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ! `1 }4 w) D/ f V0 v' jand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... / U- o7 O' Z( R8 W8 N/ ^. s , R. }8 z- {% s' tI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ) G9 J: e4 R" r
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 5 h0 R! {! f1 k. w/ K2 FWell, just my personal comments. ) I4 I/ t+ d1 @( }. ?: T* n# X( Y: [0 h) x: q n- e$ R1 X
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
* O& J7 V8 S! J, f" v& p* v
