if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！4 F e# {! c/ p. ^- g( _
o: k) k# I: a, i4 Q2 b/ Y2 |: c: W
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 / M/ f1 m( z5 l$ S不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 ; T4 z. s7 ~ i; X) ~9 L3 Q+ a; d" H8 I
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ) j3 T4 {1 d+ n# H, c ( O- ]/ @0 c$ I+ g% A7 m[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 2 B3 M. y' T- K5 H# b5 |8 L b
/ N" q/ a0 x1 Z3 S/ O' h' t7 i5 M) f3 p, g
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,# U3 D9 C' w- s
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... Y! i" p' r2 ], D8 u" [6 }/ `
, G6 x: d, S' n7 V
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 7 L. m9 _' s6 L% `; H5 P; N
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. * w! D6 K* I8 }, I2 lWell, just my personal comments.- S) | o7 G# F# K1 u- [
2 F' Z& E1 p3 Q
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
2 B3 M. y' T- K5 H# b5 |8 L b
