if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ " k# ~) l! }- \0 Q4 ?% i+ F8 z 7 o" F; M, N G) O/ n' X2 ]: p9 F只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 * ~7 D( R$ l7 w2 d, z不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照; X0 z; |: _' ^6 u3 Q
( K' a8 k; ~- G3 i6 _( J
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ t& g3 N- w) z: y) J, P0 Q3 N
' x9 f2 _( z/ ~& U% Y: W9 P
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? . [ Z0 k+ ]- ?! L
; |# E6 E e8 i7 F% c9 \" v# t L 8 A4 ?. K1 n4 N% \1 L- T" f! m' q& zI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ' h* u/ Y; w `% [4 d# Kand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... + }- B, @8 q/ C& l# J* H1 r 2 @+ l! C2 ]; Y3 eI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ( z9 ] a' |. M! L" yOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.9 B7 k* t% ~; |# ?
Well, just my personal comments.+ u' G% i2 j# G" [
W8 t+ E/ N. j+ {. d ?& tHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
. [ Z0 k+ ]- ?! L
