版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. & i" E, Y. I( y) |2 f1 I4 F0 G+ E1 _* p; V! A7 P3 [( u) a
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. + v1 h$ A0 r, Z7 _5 T+ i - [. L7 l5 t4 ]9 C5 g( y' E, c4 F* X樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 2 k O% p- L3 h9 \* r, ?: ^ V) X( U+ w5 p: r! T o% N只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 ! K: l# n; j: d6 t# t5 u不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 6 l3 N+ n1 j! J3 M9 p" G; Z% y( C+ L2 M4 x+ m ^7 e( {4 z* F
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ * j' _1 T: p' O* \ " s9 I; w* ]5 @3 L[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 6 m4 E1 _2 \+ A8 s+ }& k
8 N, G! G' @' h( M+ H; ]
6 t4 {- ?+ s: N- G1 v7 D6 rI have watched only several "疑似" 相片,/ h2 @) n% W! O5 a+ C, w; L/ s3 ]
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....1 {" v$ ?1 K9 e- J' l
, O) U V: d9 n, dI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 0 P9 A$ q h0 H. Q' i0 u+ ?
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. " c0 z! }% V$ _/ u3 T" @% D KWell, just my personal comments. ( g, E, H* R! |* f U 1 z( g$ e7 v- t: M3 E* T, B6 yHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
6 m4 E1 _2 \+ A8 s+ }& k
