版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. 2 s+ z5 x/ A$ v2 L1 }) H 7 Z* i8 F1 _$ O( a, J6 O版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. ! M g0 {# e5 z: b( T9 b. i, U9 K2 A, T7 `4 q
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ # z1 M" K# z+ E5 T% M' N: B! S" `9 u+ v( \9 `/ X
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟4 h+ z& g9 D+ L
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照6 w# [, v6 C9 R J( K9 ?
: f) H/ r% ^. v* n- H; T! v j
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ / o$ }0 M/ V6 Y : d# ~. c" Z8 M0 h1 o[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? " }$ g: N. d- p$ N( m, ~: H8 y 9 |4 F: I) |3 C0 i7 d0 f+ M 4 k% j& K# S# J MI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, + }& k9 I" d! y/ p, f, q; b7 @and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... , E9 z# }* h, r9 _2 u1 I3 e' \% W# c
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. % c( G' g5 ^; T# K. ^5 S4 G: ~( L( O
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 1 y3 V! _8 [2 h+ X8 D# H+ tWell, just my personal comments. 5 q+ ] ~ r! T, Y8 _# i$ d , l4 ?: g3 M4 Y- B1 A( s- FHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...+ T ~8 I, K1 N* T; H( R
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
