if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ + L* D- _+ @, j0 H$ S+ t. r& M: d% O+ ?* b& d7 a
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟6 c2 K% N6 K1 L& v$ o) q' O4 j y
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 4 {1 q- A3 X$ T3 N: r. F8 d5 `$ J1 Z 6 R; n7 C' w# M! t0 w3 X U. |強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！" g& c% [0 d$ w9 q
1 K7 d+ E M% k _, L
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? $ E4 B0 S& p* ?* B4 P# j& `: E1 P) L5 D9 `
+ e7 R2 i5 ]5 M+ j
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,8 t4 R7 g2 D) Z
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 6 v+ |! G6 _) }; s " t9 B6 I0 `+ _9 YI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. , d) K$ f( P xOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 6 j- w% q0 i! Z7 U: \* zWell, just my personal comments./ ~$ P2 x( h+ N1 T2 C1 A; b# Q
; M# Y( F) j& p8 v# q
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
