Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:32 AM:
- @9 w, I. ?4 U& ?
, w* W" d! }& i0 i4 B( N) f# s4 F
oz2, Great Topic
我幫你張呢個主題: (1)Move 去吹水版? & (2) 轉做加分題好冇?
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:
1 R6 \/ h- @" |
那麼方案(2),ok?
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:37 AM:
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的,我都會加分: V4 N; X8 V3 f. S& A1 @
Ok?
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2008-2-5 01:59 AM:
你係唔係有D搞亂左啊!
上面發表嘅文章[不好]AND[錯]係有連貫性架!; U+ x1 ^) p9 k9 E: o) L+ U6 [
你嘅舉例根本就亂晒龍![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:* W# x6 L" |9 e0 y0 D6 ?
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... - C& v; ?& Z" B% v3 w2 e
* O6 R% s& ~# p/ w ^
[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11:
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事...
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:27:
應該係:【格硬黎】, 唔係: [格硬理]![]()
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:$ d6 t/ x8 R: b! `; ^
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:
多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:3 w6 x( ~( F; H9 @2 f! U* z7 f
不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰
...
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:47 AM:
放心,我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:6 }" | W& I* {: V& g
我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......8 r9 Z5 j* r; s1 S
哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim..." n' i$ H: X+ E! B; _4 M
還望大家見諒. u, R+ G8 ?' q' P* E
Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:+ a/ ?0 r' ~* F" d7 \4 ?
其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...
Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:6 k6 |! l* a! c& m
不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得9 u+ N/ v5 C. ^5 d( f L! a, v
媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀/ R, W) F4 g( w3 Z' N
& W6 D; m. L5 y: C/ N
但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |