Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.6 h2 s# M6 n6 D

: J4 `! f5 s8 \毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
- z' a9 U# _: I$ _. f. K: u
, E, z# O+ D3 A9 G" ]對打人者只作出警告了事.; [( ~4 l: n7 ^6 T; `  Y0 j5 J

+ c+ a! R' n5 f/ l. j& m0 q差人涉嫌包庇打人者.
0 A6 W: u$ u2 Q3 @+ ?. }
2 H4 n& u  H* d9 {1 Lhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ5 H' K/ S& |3 i; U/ ^5 r6 {0 H: [7 S# P' a

# l) J/ m  A. }而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.
3 q# p0 _9 Z; V5 m8 Z0 }; E% m# v  S9 [: o) ], ^3 f
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.
9 x5 p6 N  N. A  W3 r$ j  b$ r) U6 b& `+ W$ ]

3 W7 {. _/ O, |, x
- @$ q# I. B2 {. E個人認為.....% S. c. F% z0 N; C/ i

, V) J3 j, W" G/ W0 _3 f岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)" {3 I+ N' x4 J' v1 Q
& F) |' q$ f; k7 h& a
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

3 n% j8 B2 J% t+ R1 W) R6 s/ P, j  V% B' U. f
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
: @3 |5 u: Q4 M- c5 W2 Y  Ado you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?4 H" X6 u0 z' b
are you the witness of the incident?5 [5 n: O5 N- [/ t8 [
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
; t7 p& C- d0 jand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打"./ e2 n9 u- ~- J5 W; b
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:5 \9 N8 f' H: q; v
have u studied law or anything rela...
& U# ^2 Z1 N; ]8 E& \. L# Z' N

3 V* r1 a  k0 [2 s& c黑字 : 係轉貼' f1 [2 U: v; a3 _# e5 p2 |

  o. S# k7 X/ R( ?# S/ }* m* v5 x紅字 : 個人感想
5 b4 {$ z+ ^) M) R2 z" A9 e) [; h* d. a
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval & M' j  O0 a0 f1 t- r9 k9 _
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
, U1 [5 a( {" Bbtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
. y' g: f* S7 wjust becareful even if the words arent your own words..
5 \2 {0 ~* _3 l/ [. Dgood luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
+ L! o! G5 H8 `8 E$ Q( K- ?該警員明顯地想息事寧人...6 Q+ ~/ q) @; h* g% \( S0 |
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
% U) x; x4 R& U0 j如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
1 O9 P: z( l' n, e1 ?  N: v以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
+ A+ j7 v& N. K/ I1 B9 [; b( f我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事9 u: z$ U3 x9 P( ~* v0 v4 g
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當0 y+ G' l* t8 W* y$ s, V$ H
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x/ }/ \; o) T7 H1 k( ]  C
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0