娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [4/25吹水加分題] M, L, B, S, F? [4/26開始第二階段] [打印本頁]

作者: crap 時間: 2005-4-24 11:11 PM 標題: [4/25吹水加分題] M, L, B, S, F? [4/26開始第二階段]

第一階段: # J) C1 @% E5 y9 y3 r- @
這是一個心理測驗,
% w' I! T9 H* t% U) e+ ?

從前有個男人 (M) 和女人 (L), 非常相愛, 不過他們中間隔了一條很寬很深的河, 男人沒辦法過來, 女人也沒辦法過去。有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫 (B) 跟這個女人說只要她付他$20 (平常價錢的一倍), 他就載她過河。可是這個女人沒有錢, 另一個男的 (S) 知道了, 就跟這女的說：只要她陪他一晚, 他就付她$20 。女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河, 很幸福地跟她所愛的男人重逢了。不幸的, 有一天男人的一個朋友知道了L 跟S 的事, 這個朋友（F）馬上跟M講, M知道了馬上就跟L 分手了。 ( ^6 o% C+ R. }; I3 n7 s6 @

6 o' t' F0 H0 Q8 b7 `睇完呢個小故事, 大家覺得 M 、 L 、 B 、 S 和 F, 邊個最好, 邊個最壞? 請將佢地由最好排到最壞

+ G+ o! s+ G+ J; J, u8 G

這心理測驗可能很多人都做過的,
但係響現實中, 你地最唔可以接受邊一個? 請給解釋

(解釋得有觀點/ 詳細的都會有分加

)

大家有興趣可以排一次, 同分享下咁樣排既原因
答案聽日會公佈,之後會再第2階段討論

' U/ e5 \) N+ k9 u) O7 p4 I
6 x8 x1 {: Z# _6 i: i d- F/ a7 o
p.s. 知道答案既朋友請保持沈默, 講左會扣分嫁

+ r ?& ~+ Z! e
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-5-6 at 11:00 AM ]

作者: yutik 時間: 2005-4-24 11:17 PM

here is my result: 1.F 2.L 3:B 4.S 5.M' S7 x' ~4 j: f6 l# G9 u
actually, i've played before( o" a5 b& V! ^8 V/ H) s. Y
and i know what the letters represent.

作者: crap 時間: 2005-4-24 11:20 PM

Originally posted by yutik at 2005-4-25 01:17 AM:
. P+ \7 P B" r; {) N( ?here is my result: 1.F 2.L 3:B 4.S 5.M8 C" |8 E4 w) p3 p: F4 S% | P
actually, i've played before4 {; D/ J5 \( S7 h, p5 d# B
and i know what the letters represent.

hi yutik~

i know many ppl have played this, this is a popular test
i just want to have ppl explaining their choices la
, z, m( T2 M6 O/ M4 h

@11:23pm
i've changed the question a little bit, does it make more sence to u now?

& n- `" ^' U) Z3 r9 _) O+ Q
! P) A0 ], \* |2 [
[ Last edited by crap on 2005-4-25 at 01:24 AM ]

作者: 月月鳥 時間: 2005-4-24 11:24 PM

f
l
s
m
b

作者: Asurada129 時間: 2005-4-24 11:24 PM 標題: L, B, F, S, M

L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件* d9 N2 b, }) l, x) n' {; f
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

作者: thinkitect 時間: 2005-4-24 11:26 PM

from good to bad7 e w/ L1 S: S! r
l b s m f

作者: 月月鳥 時間: 2005-4-24 11:30 PM

最唔可以接受船夫 (B)3 q# Z, u2 C2 U7 J |/ }
因為他不應收$,以致女人同其他人扑,最後令到人分手, R! D! b" m) T2 s X6 w- o: _) c
9 L# g: a7 q. m# g, m5 x, l
應造就他們[男和女],比佢過河

作者: antonytwl1679 時間: 2005-4-24 11:45 PM

L>F>B>M>S
好>>>>>>>>壞

作者: jason williams 時間: 2005-4-24 11:56 PM

M>F>S>B>L' t' I) @+ |4 x" p' I
. c; K2 c( Z2 d! k2 z/ g
M, dun concern B4 d( g' V( _4 ?' c
F, utilize B" q0 j7 }+ `- g# f- O
S, "八" but dun care the influence of his words
B, dun help B, but since he needs to earn# e' Z' ?' x* r" F. p
L, do the most

作者: aiqidejiao 時間: 2005-4-25 12:01 AM

小弟知道晒英文代表咩意思& G$ G9 \8 D2 {( f
所以玩唔到9 {- u8 S2 |- Z( |5 p
版主不如係咁意加番少少分比小弟* {+ K: V+ o( C3 Q; h9 E
鼓勵下我咁誠實認頭話知道同埋忍唔講

作者: Rika 時間: 2005-4-25 12:33 AM

由最好排到最壞
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong7 {, c9 d8 N; C" w; Y* q; o1 j
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her, q' t) c" _& f& O; ]4 G
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

作者: 左輪仔 時間: 2005-4-25 12:34 AM

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
5 ^1 f9 ~5 p. j- H. D1 }- v( v
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人

S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!

6 g& q0 F- S- G
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做

" h) r/ f5 N8 N" v* H) N( o- q3 ]
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志

7 ?, F% j0 p5 l' c& b- E& N
/ n( z9 _% A! i7 W2 X
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,4 @' o7 x7 O j2 X# m: Q
正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好

- P% s/ [! v) p1 Z, R3 `% f' |
F/ ]0 t- i& n
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

作者: 代仔 時間: 2005-4-25 12:34 AM

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
而家答多次
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽7 a7 ^/ u( L! ^4 H5 }
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢7 B: B2 o$ F/ `0 h
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.( |5 h7 _7 h( |. [9 A0 T' w
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

作者: hk853 時間: 2005-4-25 12:52 AM

L>F>M>B>S

L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢- P1 W% P( t# z3 F# D, v
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

作者: JCer 時間: 2005-4-25 01:03 AM

最壞 F>S>M>L>B 唔壞9 M d0 _3 l" A+ |( ~7 ~
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"* E+ m% B9 m4 g# n, C$ s$ g* Z/ S
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法) m9 P7 K- I6 s% C
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果8 _ i4 y" |% j6 z6 H
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
/ F3 g( \" b( M, R! m) \

世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

作者: angellyz 時間: 2005-4-25 01:06 AM

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

作者: tai1980 時間: 2005-4-25 01:14 AM

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:! z4 p, ^8 t# l
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己/ ~: o8 n4 i+ a5 E
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘8 c1 r4 K! L9 @7 P/ V7 g/ ~6 O
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
6 J6 `% _8 j0 t' FF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; |% r' m* m5 Z- `$ `; G7 g
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

same choices with u , but want to add some comments

B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river
6 i# `5 S# U) ~& n( a( K
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something

so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end ( 女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )

F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
7 y. T: |, G. }. M# T
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......' ~# h$ D, k/ n' O% I

[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

作者: waterfire 時間: 2005-4-25 01:45 AM

大概可以講....錯ge
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢# f& X0 X& v' u! C3 ~) h6 A2 l
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; l# m7 u* z6 e: g: t
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma; `2 D, u3 o _! a

最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

作者: hiroraymond 時間: 2005-4-25 02:20 AM

好似好有趣咁，
由最好開始排起既話，
L B M F S 啦，) E# X' C2 R+ ^/ ], A  {
* n5 o# n4 c2 }
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？! f2 Y2 p1 q. A6 X
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。% T( L* b: ?: d
) g( d! `) w% ^! s7 @
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，/ a0 _7 g" @( z4 F: x4 a
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。+ |# t  }) K8 a7 R

而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，. a* K, l" J2 \$ h
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，/ I( b8 i7 J" M& }2 U1 N
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
M 都可算壞了。' R" p3 K! ~3 `  q
& s3 t6 Y  Z* c1 T+ A& O
F 呢個人仲掂，: B8 k# w9 L, F: z
知道既唔等於要講，; N* ~+ c' {! |, X/ H, \
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，# d& v! [" N- ^% l) l% Q% r& r6 {
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
. X; r/ G9 p: h
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，* A8 @+ ]( i& }6 ~( R) ?$ l, I
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。* S- B5 `$ z* n# G
5 ?5 g4 J- E+ R0 @: Y# x3 G
0 |/ r6 P5 M0 m1 n) ]  S8 C
. ?4 g' f- f2 E  h; m0 z( S4 l
題外話：. _3 j$ m8 p, f: a. v& [
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- C9 w; h8 d# k& F( f* L8 A0 A
睇到 S 呢條友，, v5 `# V5 r. U5 J* m
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

作者: newman2005 時間: 2005-4-25 03:19 AM

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
' s- @8 C' d6 u
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係/ x1 X+ e. H8 r: d5 U; h% G5 S
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她% |3 m, s }. T" U
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...

作者: sfxc0000 時間: 2005-4-25 02:41 PM

由好至壞:F>M>L>B>S
! N' I6 S4 ?2 r% L0 h' u, T
F:我最接受呢一個. 雖然可能好多人認為佢影響左L同M的關係, 但作為一個朋友,
我認為佢係應該講出真相. 做朋友是不可隱瞞朋友的

1 y) }- b. }+ h
L:雖然佢係為左愛情而做出呢d行為, 但係都唔應該出賣自己肉體.3 Z B) d& |1 Q* f! ^" g0 z8 T2 p
當出賣自己肉體時, 就如同出賣自己私愛人, 但L好值得同情

4 Z4 e7 T6 M O. o: N5 l. O7 @4 u0 B
M:當知道自己私女友做出呢d行為, 分手是一件無可厚非的事.
但佢就冇給予L解釋, 所以佢都好唔o岩

B:明知L極之需要過河, 竟然坐地起價, 其實同S一樣咁賤格, 0 A3 v i& x& M& p( ~
不過因為冇肉體交易, 所以好S少少

) Z& b# H: \* ?0 l5 i* V/ Z- _
S:一定係最壞o個個啦, 因為知道L需要錢而提出同L做不道德的交易

作者: F.king 時間: 2005-4-25 03:41 PM

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves5 F7 V- C2 S$ p
M is for his pride
L is for visiting her lover
B is for money
S is for sex
except F, he can't get anything
but he just did something wrong for friends, W6 O; w: t' H8 }2 E- D+ N
therefore, I wound like to support F' r! B# `" V, e$ f8 m
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything5 Z; Y! p" E" E- |* t

from good to bad
F >L> B> S>M

作者: dexter 時間: 2005-4-25 06:01 PM

玩過啦, hehe

作者: sfxc0000 時間: 2005-4-25 06:03 PM

Originally posted by dexter at 2005-4-25 06:01 PM:6 S: C1 L8 o; w! L$ D
玩過啦, hehe

其實我上堂都玩過~~
不過內容有少少唔同

作者: ssFCoRn 時間: 2005-4-25 09:15 PM

L = 為左自己love既人寧願犠牲..[我都會咁做]
M = 因佢係比F誤導所以就比第2佢啦( r' y, `# x8 B( }8 h
B = 一個為自己利益既船夫, 正常hk人係甘
F = 唔知全情話比M知誤導左吖M
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件[呢條P...都算..K啦]

作者: crap 時間: 2005-4-25 09:30 PM

Originally posted by sfxc0000 at 2005-4-25 08:03 PM:
9 T1 A" z5 G Y1 R/ g' c q; a
# B! ~$ Q, s& Z5 P8 d: i- T5 H其實我上堂都玩過~~
1 _+ i* {# k# ?8 U, b4 G不過內容有少少唔同

3 L$ s% x [: I0 h
答案唔係重點8 z$ R% c- |& L, m, R8 V: u2 L
點樣分釋先係重點

作者: singdotcom 時間: 2005-4-25 10:59 PM

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物: (我當$20只係好少錢)& U& y, {* k0 C# A$ K$ Z
, B* y% d7 S, e4 ~4 [1 ]5 W) O4 t
L - 要過河有大把方法, 只係為左咁小事就同人上床, 愛一個人又點會咁易同其他男人上床, 成件事都係由佢呢個決定引起
5 q" }# D2 {4 v0 D
S - 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格, 仲要以為用$20就昆到條女, 好cheap! 但係條女又真係比佢昆到喎!

M - 愛一個人應該要包容佢, 就算佢做錯都唔可以飛佢, 何況佢唔係害你

B - 呢D冇良船主都係衰架啦, 但係呢d人到處都係, 呢個人對呢件事起唔到關鍵作用" l6 }; S1 K; g/ Y9 K4 Y. V
% b* j* V/ F, Q* s
F - 佢講或唔講都會有佢個理由支持佢. 唔講, 咁m唔知就最幸福. 講, 就比m知情權, 等佢好好解決呢個問題

作者: jason williams 時間: 2005-4-25 11:27 PM

have answer right now?

作者: crap 時間: 2005-4-26 12:00 AM

準時12:00

2 d* l' J+ W1 W+ F' C1 N% S
9 J( c" b5 q6 t1 Z, e2 O6 J' q
第二階段:6 U! q3 _0 @9 }7 \, p& L+ x

M = 道德
B = 事業, s7 r5 e6 y: N X7 O) `7 k
L = 愛情# C/ @3 t2 \: m3 Y2 x4 r
S = 性
F = 友情! \5 g* W( A2 }: H m
! i# I7 V" u% ]
根據原註, 大家排的次序是你們心底覺得呢5樣既重要性, 準嗎?5 }$ f4 g3 z" ]8 \1 Z& J" \0 _$ L% U* t
+ i. o' S0 D! `* P
準不準不重要, 現在關心的是

:
1) 把道德跟事業排在附近的朋友, 你們認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
3) 把愛情跟性排在兩極的朋友, 你們在現實中真可以以愛為大前題去找女友嗎?- Y3 \ E0 D9 c) e; J$ q* `

即使沒有如此排位, 但有興趣分釋的朋友也不妨跟大家分享一下, 第一階段沒回應的朋友也可以參與回應第二階段

0 s$ R: s" q# v4 S! T: C
9 P. [* I% O; W/ Y$ B# ]+ z1 A
[ Last edited by crap on 2005-4-26 at 02:14 AM ]

作者: 風火雷電 時間: 2005-4-26 12:12 AM

F-佢將佢知嘅野講比佢朋友知,當佢係朋友先會講,等佢自己諗清楚*o*
L-為左愛,完全冇條件地付出,不過......真係值得???0 ?3 X0 R! c0 K' X0 Q
B-一般商人(奸商)做法,冇野好講-.-
S-依個賤人,見人地需要錢,就要人地同佢過夜嚟滿足自己\"/
M-原全冇諗過對方對佢嘅付出,話分就分,冇"L"嘅付出,又邊有曾經開心嘅日子丫>﹏<

作者: 風火雷電 時間: 2005-4-26 12:15 AM

打字太慢=.=2 H) N" w0 v( ]7 V, p
打完出到嚟已經有答案-.-

作者: jason williams 時間: 2005-4-26 12:25 AM

quite accuate wow

作者: dawrf 時間: 2005-4-26 12:35 AM

B F S M L

作者: F.king 時間: 2005-4-26 06:21 AM

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
8 n+ m+ W+ Q' w' T D$ j% s$ {準時12:00' G" [: Z$ z9 W# B1 p7 C' @

8 E8 y3 \% D& E, [. t[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case! @5 T7 D2 t9 V
y* e/ T# S& g* d3 }
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?

I believe this is very hard to be together! } e5 k' G v/ z) N/ O" f* s
but I still trust that both of them can be together

作者: yuzhiliang111 時間: 2005-4-26 10:54 AM

1）道德跟事業:如果一個人連道德都沒有的話就連做人的起碼準則都沒有，這種人還會有或配有事業嗎？ x( n1 {4 Y- Q4 r0 z* ~& |" @
2）友情跟愛情：有時候有情和愛情會互相衝突，你所愛的人不喜歡你的好朋友不希望你和他們交往。這實在是一件令人頭痛的事，有首歌不是唱過：“一邊是友情一邊是愛情，左右都不是爲難了自己。”人生有時就是如此魚與熊掌不可兼得,到底該怎樣選擇沒有固定的模式也沒有評判的標準。只有當事人自己覺得最合適的方式才可以！
3) 現在的社會金錢與權利至上，有許多人爲了錢和權忽略了感情更不要説是愛了！要知道愛是什麽東西都換不來的，沒了金錢和權力不要緊只要心中有愛就會有出路!人們往往忽略了這一點，愛是人類與生俱來的一種美好的本能。只有多用這種美好的本能人才會活得更精彩，試想一下人世間少了爾虞我詐，多了愛世界也會變得更美好。所以我認爲在現實生活中以愛為大前提去找女朋友是可行的是必行的！

作者: jason williams 時間: 2005-4-27 04:19 PM

i oppositely think that if u wanna be v rich in business, u must need to put off yr moral!!!
奸商奸商ma!

just look through some rich business man, they employ see II to work in the construction site, after the construction finished, they call police themselves to catch them, so that they can save the salary payment!!! is it 9? yes!!! but stand from the boss, they have made much more profits to their business!' p/ n$ ]% f+ |, g- o
for 出賣 fds or closest relatives or wife/husband, dun need to say la, see it in newspaper everyday already, if $$$ is included, this kind of problwm is easily existing!!! easy for us to see clearly about 人性!9 e8 Q. ~ ^- _( A9 o7 C/ Y

so, i dun agree than no moral will no business! but is it correct? i dun think so, but where we living in? is a material and snobby business world, if u can't give up yr moral, dun do business!!!
6 k1 W6 s2 d" [# N9 }
i quite like this psycho game, as each of these 5 elements are also holding to each other strongly in fact!!! funny

作者: 老鬼X 時間: 2005-5-1 06:49 PM

ＢＳＬＭＦ

作者: ricojohny 時間: 2005-5-1 07:42 PM

最好bfslm最衰
b貪錢沒罪/ C( `4 M5 Z9 B
f都無吹水,爆堅野8 W" o( a" I5 ?$ M; D( |
s襯火打劫
l為求目的,出賣靈魂
m衰窮,無錢自己過去搵l

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/)