Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
1 Y/ |& S2 d4 Z7 m佢都係方便各網友啫!
& Z& U/ Q. G) o0 L1 w; ^之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.6 @+ |! U% Q+ J( @% y
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!; @( v/ ]2 _1 i9 D0 {8 q
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!6 m0 D+ D6 h) j8 g& G% d  h7 c% j
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
# x3 f6 N( x  j% e* i- y  I純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
* D) M% v$ m4 T; a' a- ?
& W$ O4 F5 ]" e0 H! B0 ^8 ~/ i[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
* R* z* @7 C: T+ i1 l2 t7 ~http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
& i* {) i9 L5 S' z: f% L/ \3 F/ z. S
9 @) q& w* Y3 v[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!  ]8 @9 f( z" s  N. }* v
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?, m! ~* J$ ?  ^6 {9 F
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!  |$ K% S7 B3 N; L* b! b
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!& B5 n" D6 B1 {( x' }! h) J, M
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
; u8 X2 l' p- O1 S根本就荒天下之大謬!2 G7 _4 L2 @( {; T3 y9 S
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
3 a. u4 X" n1 ~& ]根本就荒天下之大謬!
" R5 \. b* o2 `不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.8 G8 z7 \1 d; y: h% U

) F8 |* X9 y+ ^0 o  q# k/ ^& J  u佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
* v/ I: i. ^1 \
  d$ n2 x3 S# P" q% @現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
" i* C! q- @* L) D2 O, E: z0 V0 O! o" Y9 p- X- T# D& p
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
( }4 i: z( Y1 H, b7 _% x- v! W' I9 c1 B# m0 b. M' k
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多7 J. u( d2 C' ~" F0 G4 F
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
( S# e& O- u/ X罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:- r; N+ I* _9 l! \. X  m, e9 Q
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
  J3 l6 o2 a# N+ c% _, C9 P# H7 s
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! ) A' j: n$ i5 t3 }9 h* u
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
4 i4 R0 M5 s) y9 J2 J1 N  P既牟利又侵權!9 X) b7 {  I' Q+ q
但亦大行其道.....7 P2 I& W( Y" j! B! D
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
" M: U9 F+ d0 T6 x只係香港政府係多重標準!; K/ ?4 P- W$ R4 a% r2 B) h- s$ B
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!* q% D' Y0 Z3 d6 ?! I
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....; i' S+ ]& u( T  m' W5 L5 l- d
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
# T& w2 W! H) @1 n但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:& y0 p5 p. v0 d4 [' G
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
& q. H: d, M# [( Y. A
I agree you points that it could be illegal
5 O. N1 a2 N( a6 ^* y7 D; ~but that is still a "gray area"
9 E+ F3 g7 r6 N8 ]! p+ C) Cwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
$ D0 ]8 o8 z. \7 X8 f- e& m$ I0 e& y9 f
anyway, I want to say that is; f" @) v+ g' L5 \9 ~
who is supposed to be protected by laws
  F' q: Y3 r6 W3 C# T2 r0 f# ]; ucreators?4 @; j1 O% j, ?; m- Z
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market& ?% ~2 z7 p/ x  Q: b% m
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
! b) W4 p# h" h+ L5 iwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those- p& ~2 V- h* ]  R- c. G6 s7 k9 M
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# I9 l# V+ Y1 @1 E2 B) ^; c其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 l# S& W5 z8 F0 g9 C- H/ e$ W我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:" R2 i; b' f+ n2 s: I! _+ K

- u5 u+ z- @6 D7 U; ~9 C我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
; `, I& ?( o# B5 M+ h3 g# M唔係喎!# i/ K: _7 T0 k# N
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
# U$ p6 T# C2 j$ I. |; Q我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!* i3 X5 n! l9 I  \# W0 ?0 h' \
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!0 H3 o5 J2 [! X  T
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
: ~5 R0 `0 a! U一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!7 a2 `$ d  A& a; G
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
9 ~( h7 i) n- Oif so bad, dun download la, right?
* F- n7 m( X+ F. Y9 }# W( fi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^, b9 Z7 T5 I  ?! H* x# j4 H6 P
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
8 I/ V6 y, x$ T8 x# ~" _% |no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la5 R6 o: m) Q2 c3 ?( a: I
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society* S- p% o0 N$ V5 ~& i
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........." {  Z5 W) w8 |2 g* Q+ o
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
& F- ]' v" t6 l" h* i9 @so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!$ L1 h9 P# z4 |4 T3 \1 c, x
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
: g# `& K0 p; `5 S政府想比下馬威0的人~~- C- |: K2 P* t6 O) `
錢就一定罰2 X$ j' d5 d; ~: C" J5 t1 M
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,3 [$ w1 d, b& q- v" q
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?" R. `! `% I$ f$ n. b( M! z
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?& ^" g4 s1 j$ L% e" ~3 N
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
3 r* \  y8 Z! Z+ U告得入我切!!!
% V1 @0 A! Q" K6 `
我當初都估告唔入,
; v& F: X& u; o8 D3 Z0 C6 S不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,4 T" I- i5 u' [2 n# E8 J+ U6 ^0 o
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇" G) j6 v0 \) t3 \
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
# R+ U* m3 M4 T0 ]. J+ D4 }/ d( c美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
. Y; d$ `; K* h( X* M因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0