Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
8 Y8 m* ^8 C1 H& b佢都係方便各網友啫!
4 w2 b0 x6 p/ C2 Y. S+ V之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
! x5 [/ |' l8 A0 j! F4 R  a告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
5 E& \# E% q2 X: j$ c+ j我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!) Q/ r0 ]$ ?7 ?6 }
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
" j, f3 i9 Q6 |4 K3 V0 ^純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!- |: S% f/ Q6 z+ o, p' ^
) k$ x5 O1 q. c2 C
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 ! }: g( S+ e: g" F
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
9 a2 u) R% o& ^; s
$ R! A" I3 R/ x& s# E* p; [8 R0 p" `[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!. R. C1 L% x/ j) ?0 _! s
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?* j( G5 w' @+ |( h' `4 B# N
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
0 ]. f- X4 |! r1 s: R講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!$ @5 E4 b" u* j5 I# X
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
! b' K! `7 Z+ {& ?. V' [根本就荒天下之大謬!4 i0 K$ A2 R2 t' |" _
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
0 v- E) F  r2 A' [根本就荒天下之大謬!
& y: C" d" l; e) {! Q" t不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
; c0 N0 y" B8 @5 C7 M
4 \2 E- J. M* u. s0 P佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
7 E8 q- N, ]% g: h2 J/ f" B
3 d$ c3 }( k7 K* Z$ {0 s現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.# _) H. j5 w8 J( f) S3 d

5 Y: |3 `# z! d# K9 L& `沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.; I* l( @% e  B: M) q! Y
9 |9 M( f' u1 S4 |" K; }! ^& Y* H
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多* M" j8 O, b5 F% v
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
+ M2 e+ P& j- p8 e9 z# i: ]罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
/ `" r* ~' H9 }) |# `/ m大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# L- {9 G: E/ Q7 o: }2 y" Evcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
& l" q! k2 l  V  S- f然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!1 ?5 w% [/ p4 v  H! ]
既牟利又侵權!
& M0 T1 q& F. N* N但亦大行其道.....; S, P# ]( @8 ~' f" d
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......7 ]+ D$ c5 i- n5 V
只係香港政府係多重標準!
/ G: V& Y& d! |* N" ^, r' F同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!6 ]8 ~  C1 l/ Y1 m# t. R
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....1 x% V6 f, S) n& P
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)& Z0 R8 r  g1 R  N2 ^
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:! A& D' f' S9 T
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" {) |8 M( k5 ^' l& H" e9 oI agree you points that it could be illegal* Z, _+ w. G. Y& C
but that is still a "gray area"
7 f/ p. p0 ?! y8 Bwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
- f9 l% @7 }) W2 o, I0 q; g5 k8 D' O) R( Z
anyway, I want to say that is6 r! a( K$ C" y: K( Y9 e
who is supposed to be protected by laws
( U, R! b- [' O+ m* q8 m/ e% bcreators?) F5 K" q3 j: y4 V. \& t! q0 ~8 A
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
, W1 E- \7 T$ F% q) Y- Slet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.2 H7 e8 a$ v+ ?# u1 C; m2 l; \
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
" Q- b, t+ `- y- |+ x* ]  BWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:  s( Y8 J; U" A. o2 x
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
& k$ h7 K, m' \* }, e6 ~
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
' ?# B5 U7 ^* Q& p4 N' I9 |# Y. P
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
  M% `! t0 Q* i- {% \/ K" j
唔係喎!
' W$ ~+ p0 j% `古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
3 s; J' Z) M9 D! E; X我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!+ ^- @; F, K. Y8 n, C
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!- l6 ]0 m3 {" d
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事+ f$ K% ?8 M0 c6 i3 j9 T; ^; a
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!8 \: G( K+ p9 D9 E6 J2 k. }
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
  C1 {1 a2 d& ?- f2 hif so bad, dun download la, right?( {# X! W# i" s9 q
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
* o2 k( w% y  u8 Y1 o# dbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct: u( q: c+ k; W0 N4 ~" u3 r7 a- a
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la+ d% {4 }6 O" S( N" `; }
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society0 U& D  O( M& n. l
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........* l' ^+ n" {8 t% y8 O
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!. [3 k1 B5 g8 e5 M; g" b
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
3 K1 [3 }$ J6 y& h0 ^. E佢又唔係殺人放火~~~) B8 ^9 W# ^& m/ ^8 D& m  M, |) g
政府想比下馬威0的人~~8 G7 m9 @' ~! V
錢就一定罰
) {! e: T6 G5 W( Z未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
' \$ Q; N- y0 x$ j1 _$ \6 G$ I: }唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?3 G- o7 W2 J. i* q
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
# k0 ?1 m9 v  B4 a+ `到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:4 [2 {' g+ h- S
告得入我切!!!
9 @5 p; q; H/ P* c; J( W我當初都估告唔入,# U. D0 l1 [; Y2 w" w
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
, b2 Y, c& `7 D8 f' Z8 l6 a真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇% [: J1 i% i2 \" {+ A& M8 r
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:1 C: P; k5 x/ z
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
" o# M2 @3 V( W, Y  W因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0