Board logo

標題: MPV........AI [打印本頁]

作者: abu1984    時間: 2005-5-3 05:23 AM     標題: MPV........AI

AI.......佢好似當每埸都係自己每後一場咁打架......佢對每埸真係以身相許架
作者: cam_kwok86    時間: 2005-5-3 05:36 AM

its MVP, not MPV. but i do believe Iverson deserve it. He almost single-handedly carried the 76ers into the playoffs. without him, they'd be near the bottom of the eastern conference. He's the leading scorer of the regular season and his assist numbers has been spectacular. However, the spot like of whose going to be MVP has been placed mostly on Nash and O'Neal. Eventhough i think that Iverson should win, its most likely those 2 would be #1 and 2 in MVP voting. Iverson is a crucial part to his team and IS the most valuable Player of his team, and deserves to win.
作者: fuckbigball    時間: 2005-5-3 07:48 AM

唔係佢技術唔好, 不過MVP係唔應該第一圈就收工架, MVP都係唔應該隊波排分岸第七架
作者: Ticat    時間: 2005-5-3 08:12 AM

Originally posted by ---bigball at 2005-5-2 07:48 PM:
唔係佢技術唔好, 不過MVP係唔應該第一圈就收工架, MVP都係唔應該隊波排分岸第七架
its season MVP, so how they do in playoff shouldnt have anything to do with it  /shrug
i know AI deserve it, but IMO, MVP is the one that bring the whole team to a new lvl, not only he play good, he need to make his teammate play good too.

AI stat is really outstanding, no doubt about that, however ... look at what Nash did to Suns, last year they like 29-53, this year ... they have the best record 62-20, well u can say they have Quentin Richardson this year too, so the team play better, but i think the impact that Nash has to his team is better than any other player this year, no matter he win it or not this year, he is the MVP this season for me
作者: d228216    時間: 2005-5-3 09:07 AM

Originally posted by Ticat at 2005-5-3 08:12 AM:


its season MVP, so how they do ...
無悔支持AI!
作者: abu1984    時間: 2005-5-3 09:33 AM

AI都知一個人打得好係唔會WIN.........唔係AI唔想隊波好.......76人太多新仔啦
而D OTHERS(如WEBBER,KOVER)又唔穩定WOR
SO...............佢SIN要不停得分
AI.唔想可以好似WADE OR NASH打得咁舒服咩??
AI....全身傷都要上陣AR
作者: d228216    時間: 2005-5-3 11:39 AM

Originally posted by abu1984 at 2005-5-3 05:23 AM:
AI.......佢好似當每埸都係自己每後一場咁打架......佢對每埸真係以身相許架
M V P

Most Valuable Player
作者: cam_kwok86    時間: 2005-5-3 01:13 PM

Originally posted by Ticat at 2005-5-2 04:12 PM:


its season MVP, so how they do ...
but when u look at nash and the suns, u see that the whole starting 5 is really good and better than the 76er's. granted the 76ers got Webber at the deadline, he was still hurting and didn't really produce. Iverson single-handedly carried the team into the playoffs, where as IMO Marion was more of the glue guy in Phoenix.
作者: oicoic    時間: 2005-5-3 01:24 PM

Originally posted by d228216 at 2005-5-3 09:07 AM:

無悔支持AI!
YeaH!!!
作者: below6cm    時間: 2005-5-3 02:32 PM

我認為是拿殊,無錯,拿殊的隊友質素確比ai高,但我亦相信何謂時勢造英雄,ai的鬥志是不用置疑,亦擔起整隊球隊的成敗關鍵,但拿殊亦是,沒有拿殊在陣,整隊太陽就像日落了。

我明白大家欣賞ai是因為他打不死的鬥志,那種爭勝的決心正是球迷最愛看的,一場賽事的精彩之處正是由此而來。加上ai這季明顯沒有這麼獨食,肯分波,但,這代表他就是nba眾星之中「最有價值」的球員嗎?

拿殊出名助攻了得,但得分卻表現平平,但在控制進攻節奏、快攻處理都對球隊起著領導作用,使球隊在聯盟中由上季的西岸第十三,躍升到今季的西岸第一,本人認為「最有價值球員」的「價值」就是在於此。

所以如果以感性角度分析,ai得mvp是實至名歸;但從理性角度分析,拿殊待mvp也是最佳人選
作者: 甘國武    時間: 2005-5-3 04:03 PM

在這裡不要扮高手!
從理性角度看,拿殊、AI、O'neal都實至名歸
問題是以甚麼角度看
表面上拿殊和O'neal的加盟,各自令球隊戰績
而兩人之中,拿殊在陣與否的戰績分野較明顯
加上suns進步幅度亦最大,所以他有優勢
但如要問在陣與否的影響,我就不相信AI會比拿殊少
看了76人賽事的人,應不會懷疑AI控制進攻節奏的能力
至於快攻處理,隊友跑不了,你又如何發揮?
(不過快攻處理的能力,我會覺得拿殊好一點)

老實說,論在陣與否的影響,AI和拿殊都是冠絕NBA的
他們兩人其中一個成了MVP,我也沒異議
相反O'neal就遜一點了......
作者: d228216    時間: 2005-5-3 10:23 PM

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2005-5-3 04:03 PM:
在這裡不要扮高手!
從理性角度看,...
E ! 甘生除咗果味野之外, 對NBA見解亦相當獨到渦....拜服!
作者: coke123    時間: 2005-5-4 05:09 PM

唔洗煩la, nba.com 已經話Nash 係mvp la, 等宣佈jar
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-5-4 05:11 PM

Originally posted by coke123 at 2005-5-4 17:09:
唔洗煩la, nba.com 已經話Nash 係mvp la, 等宣佈jar
一早預左架啦!戰績好,又能顯示自己在隊中的重要地位,實至名歸。
作者: pillgreen    時間: 2005-5-5 02:15 AM

A.I.做唔到MVP......
唔緊要啦,起碼都做返個"得分王"。
作者: below6cm    時間: 2005-5-5 09:59 AM

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2005-5-3 04:03 PM:
在這裡不要扮高手!
從理性角度看,...
甘生,你分析詳盡,又有自己見解,講得獨到精辟,你的說話一出,所有人都變晒低手啦。

哈哈
講下自己見解就比人話扮高手
甘生真係字字珠機
作者: 甘國武    時間: 2005-5-5 10:16 AM

你只知有無nash的勝率差,忽略AI對球隊的實質而深遠影響
就斷言AI的「實至名歸」只在「感性角度」
你以為我們支持AI只因打不死的鬥志?
你一廂情願把我們看得這麼膚淺、以為自己這麼看透
這就是我叫你「不要扮高手」的原因
作者: below6cm    時間: 2005-5-5 10:33 AM

哈哈哈
作者: crap    時間: 2005-5-5 10:45 AM

Originally posted by coke123 at 2005-5-4 07:09 PM:
唔洗煩la, nba.com 已經話Nash 係mvp la, 等宣佈jar
有咁既樹? nba.com邊度講?
作者: Ticat    時間: 2005-5-5 12:37 PM

Originally posted by crap at 2005-5-4 10:45 PM:


有咁既樹? nba.com邊度講?
i cant find it either ... only find the part said Nash should be MVP by fans voting
作者: crap    時間: 2005-5-5 12:53 PM

Originally posted by Ticat at 2005-5-5 02:37 PM:


i cant find it either ... only find the part said Nash should be MVP by fans voting
yes, that's all i could see as well..
作者: cwc_tkd    時間: 2005-5-5 01:40 PM

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2005-5-5 10:16 AM:
你只知有無nash的勝率差,忽略AI對球...
睇黎你覺得自己好高手wo~~
勁到連人地講下自己感受都唔得~
甘版主無得頂!!!

[ Last edited by cwc_tkd on 2005-5-5 at 01:41 PM ]
作者: oicoic    時間: 2005-5-5 02:01 PM

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2005-5-3 04:03 PM:
在這裡不要扮高手!
從理性角度看,...
如果AI有Nash  o個4個拍檔就無敵囉
作者: crap    時間: 2005-5-5 02:23 PM

Originally posted by oicoic at 2005-5-5 04:01 PM:
如果AI有Nash  o個4個拍檔就無敵囉
但如果AI有4個咁既隊友, 佢既打法可能就唔會係大家鍾意既AI, 一係隊友會灰曬....
作者: below6cm    時間: 2005-5-5 04:37 PM

[quote]Originally posted by cwc_tkd at 2005-5-5 01:40 PM:


睇黎你覺得自己好高手wo~~
勁到連人地講下自己感受都唔得~
甘版主無得頂!!!




這正是我覺得可笑的地方,哈哈哈
「高手」……哈哈哈
作者: 甘國武    時間: 2005-5-5 04:53 PM

睇黎你覺得自己好高手wo~~
勁到連人地講下自己感受都唔得~
甘版主無得頂!!!
我從無唔比佢講自己既見解
問題係佢曲解我地(AI支持者)支持AI既原因
以為我地看支持AI只係因佢既鬥志咁表面
e d全部係佢一廂情願的唸法,但就強加係我地身上
佢以為看透我地想法,所以我叫佢唔好自以為是
作者: below6cm    時間: 2005-5-6 09:22 AM

唔.........我同意你既講法
你真有深度
哈哈




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs7/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0