1呀....................~~~1 }# A( P- N1 }3 c0 p' _3 Q$ H
靚好多/\/\作者: 151515 時間: 2005-12-20 09:23 PM
Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17:! _0 z) U( d7 |% g0 ]2 h6 Q
1呀....................~~~ , J4 B9 U! s! i9 }靚好多/\/\
. L" l7 V8 R: ~6 f; F6 g" g: f
- U( D t" j& s; `" DI can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通1 q" d- _3 s6 F# _3 O6 l
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...8 B7 b. O7 S% k/ s' o
) u% J( S, Z$ S7 e" c( [
Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...8 f. L! U/ b0 E: {1 C# v
% c7 x" N1 n. t: h
B+ u% R& M: G% R( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地6 n1 c. g) F3 s3 ]' ~: B
第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...0 Z- ]7 \, _1 U6 V) r
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. / P* o) |, j# B0 Dsorry...