Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17:8 h$ j2 l- u0 t& ~
1呀....................~~~' ^6 Y6 E1 ?5 x5 m. B! V# I
靚好多/\/\
; S4 z! D# @( T+ |' @7 f6 [* w
$ z7 h1 h( k" S' @2 J, T6 \' tI can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 5 q/ I* V+ z' }9 P2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF... 9 `5 V$ z- }# v; K$ x4 F0 V( ^: R4 a 1 N3 u& X! i: I! zSecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...4 M( w" d+ x, `* t/ Q$ `
0 g4 {1 B& a/ ]9 ^* R" G3 Z * {. T1 c6 V: o/ F9 m9 w2 Q( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM