Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: 5 Y, q- h9 V8 W, N* j/ Z- l9 _; \7 I7 i3 Q1呀....................~~~( p! O( e+ w9 p4 s, D
靚好多/\/\
- r) l; H1 \. p# ^2 \, W
3 h2 @. T5 m. H1 l% ]9 FI can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通. S+ e* O, A2 B2 }
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF.... v7 y) B f$ O Z
: M2 B/ u# L: H! T# R
Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...9 _' f# E5 f! i* P9 y: s ?3 N O: m
: z! s, T& |4 @7 a8 W! E7 z
4 B* f$ w2 I+ t# J5 i7 l( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 5 U2 U6 v" D. b第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel... ' i/ N4 h v: r0 o0 W$ ?% {: p( b第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. / c/ r6 P' v/ d+ B1 L. n2 c% |sorry...