<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
4 i/ l3 @3 ^7 P6 Q7 L
$ o+ C0 o( z; ^, zfor my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married& Y& }9 _. V+ y& t$ }( }& O9 ^& m: N
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily: {' J8 o6 m4 u; o7 C, x8 @
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
/ K* K5 L5 t; z* oavoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!: T5 A) d( ]7 B" W7 v. ^1 C
* u+ @9 _6 H9 y7 U# s0 ^4 ^, D; k
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
/ E: Y$ R% {0 ?5 Q4 A1 v/ t2 L. e' z- k7 V$ E
however for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
! p6 Q' b' `* _- _& aliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point
: v" ?- k5 o; w) u$ Neasily getting worse for yr relationship
$ e* s/ y- ]5 u2 ]% s4 p9 ~4 f6 g" Z1 T& U+ f9 v: w. b: {% S, M! d
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。