<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:. v+ r8 p- r2 o. u# e
: p7 X+ C3 v2 K
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married) j) G/ V& ], |  A6 ~, E* O
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
" n/ `0 I. Z0 p: Q$ Dso that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
  k# z$ l) P" C. kavoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!
% N$ m' C: [7 P; m3 ^( I; ~  ]5 X/ Y* ^9 M1 P% x% a
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!4 e1 h5 a0 v( |5 V& W
2 o; P5 |( ^0 @) W, G6 A
however for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
* k5 r# M/ X8 e/ x' w* ^8 \living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point' i# R* |+ N- N7 O: J* b' A# H
easily getting worse for yr relationship! p5 ?: h2 A1 u

; X1 [* q9 k) ~/ _5 [% _6 o% E  W[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。