<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
8 y+ c$ v. b( q- e# x' n
: F; D9 F3 T/ Sfor my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married9 `/ C) \/ C( A) |
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
: @9 J1 |& g- k/ @+ Mso that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not9 \6 |4 h$ w. k5 i/ V! F/ v# x: H
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!
3 Y: t0 I, `* U6 f% a+ M- l/ }3 H6 j, `
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
1 v, @0 |  u( H' Q& {
+ ?" c; |* I+ J9 c) p2 \4 Rhowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
# f2 m9 t$ u# s( @% Kliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point
/ Y$ B' {/ v5 U' J0 Seasily getting worse for yr relationship
9 q( D. m8 [* Q5 x4 A' {4 I  c) u7 U  x: g& v, ~
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。