johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
6 J. F2 D7 g) x7 ^% i4 X: y! i
0 W6 [, q# i, z5 c! W  l0 r" o, b  e( Q/ j5 c# V
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

3 T1 s7 W, l: a8 j9 `

% u9 ^8 x9 h% z; x- \0 [This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
0 i; T: s, s- Z' t% Y8 E4 j, \4 M4 tFind out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:* ?  D  B1 J0 {" }
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
( R; h0 p+ Z( q, @& z) T+ A! C, C$ e  K1 R( V
民事訴訟:
) E$ K: t8 j. j1 w  ]* }3 F  r告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
' e' B7 p' D% f0 |9 I0 J仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

/ j6 U& N* N  b1 e6 @& A* Y. i3 Y( e6 _6 R" R6 K8 N4 R
Not always... like this case..
) w( Y* m( A/ O( g9 F$ Uor SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:8 h9 w1 {: ^' d1 L/ R0 y
我想聽大家自己的觀點1 q2 r9 e4 |; D
如果你喜歡
( Y6 I2 o8 ]+ d) b4 I  h9 A您可以加入討論
  f0 n6 ?' Q# ]5 x1 I3 U但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"( x+ \2 M. Q3 e, \: y5 |9 C" d4 t
已經代表自己的觀點# x  T4 t: A! @! w' l4 q0 \* c
您沒有需要繼續吠
% e) C3 u/ E4 @: i; gTHE END

/ B0 V7 l6 l! N

; M7 F6 Y1 P, \% j. vBe careful of your wording...8 U! U0 ]1 z, D) ]2 y