johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:8 N- D% |2 Y2 C" K1 ~

) R$ j4 o. C& g) ^6 y4 b5 L* x' i/ j+ a  @$ a. R- }
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

* P! E# d6 j$ D" `8 w# r/ X5 H) f8 q. g8 l  _+ v+ V5 ^
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
4 I8 e8 D. o, l8 v* d/ hFind out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:7 W' M* b0 `6 [5 a
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)0 Z. v3 U1 j& y$ L( X4 @! J
, V$ q. h2 F" P- f' J" v1 z. s% |
民事訴訟:
9 H5 p5 v9 Y+ e告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
- J1 q8 K; O  [! x仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

: C. h* s0 J# e, S

) B' ~& K+ e) t( Y8 tNot always... like this case.. + n- C3 G9 U+ [4 X6 h: \- r
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:3 l3 O9 O) @* b. P
我想聽大家自己的觀點
  i4 R2 k4 s4 i8 y) [0 [4 Z0 Y  U如果你喜歡9 S/ |) I! R" b3 f) z
您可以加入討論4 Z7 g8 i* @) @0 x
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"/ _. ^# Q+ O& J, W8 X
已經代表自己的觀點
9 _) X' t" j# A' o' c您沒有需要繼續吠/ E) K4 k, \; {: i- B
THE END

# x( R; L2 S0 g& w0 A
! C# v4 P+ w2 {- B+ [+ h: m7 O* [- oBe careful of your wording...# N9 N8 Y( I  i% Q! s