johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:% B3 H3 }- O% ]

' M8 l' S$ k  w# h) W
$ R9 o" i# Y* p2 t' F2 ^4 k) W除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

6 T) ^) j2 k( l1 e' U
9 p* I7 ~5 k0 E. J
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.4 a! H5 f$ g7 |3 N6 L4 @4 }
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:
2 g+ F: V( y& I" ]; ]7 K告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
9 I' C. i" I' Y) I, r
( }% V/ N6 k! s民事訴訟:7 z# I; ~0 E/ u% \$ g
告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
+ }$ [6 ?2 l0 M5 R' X: h仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

8 Q  @5 p2 P# w* V5 u

) l: C0 P6 u) o2 k! k5 ^: j9 ZNot always... like this case..
  B, o& b! }3 a  c0 qor SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:/ Q6 o) v, U7 @" r4 r- [; ^
我想聽大家自己的觀點1 S4 N2 J# J. u1 V* B; v4 v& E  K
如果你喜歡5 s$ o: ~3 c* J- Q1 ^& e6 C- h
您可以加入討論. ]- V4 K- m& b8 R3 C6 P. y* _
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
6 Y7 m1 N# H3 u$ l# W已經代表自己的觀點+ ^/ l% }# b0 x9 L2 }/ |
您沒有需要繼續吠" q: y, c/ M/ I  l- x) X6 s) B
THE END

  @1 ?$ [. V  x( B7 S# \
4 R7 D" X0 e+ B' H. p: q- Z9 w
Be careful of your wording...
0 O0 k7 q4 m9 H  _" g5 K, M% v