LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢  j2 E4 p2 n; V* A8 x. T! u
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權( c5 |5 D; V/ J$ @9 c& T
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:! K2 @* c) P$ R- X: q& l$ N& u0 a* X
所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law
$ ~/ \" }( |) \# a. m' ?/ m; H5 q" p+ D4 E
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

8 p6 Z3 \. O/ M+ R$ C3 A但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:; b1 i* }( x1 B0 I* ]
咁就好正啦...! `& P- Z5 T+ F+ A8 z+ z: \
咁直係話個個出街攞住...

  D) r2 {; Z0 t
所以我先唔明
3 B% B) h' B" _9 q! l+ r咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜* T" T4 T9 O/ s  s1 S. {. V
棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
' `1 t2 y) O, `4 z* j1 P- p這是兩回事，
9 v, d: d. k; `/ cMP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，
- b  S# u( a+ u+ b9 c正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，
9 K1 E8 M# b! b- `6 N+ [8 I與商品和商家無關.6 J$ o: L$ Q/ A2 k
雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......3 L9 s" J! A" P/ j* T+ ^

: A5 ~0 S5 I& Z5 q, m) B
d公司全部都利字當頭- q" o9 l# S! A
佢真係睬你都傻啦..
, J6 H" p! W3 |: X- {% s+ H. j- r唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:' V; d7 Y9 d. g* P+ B7 n- Z- v
咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

( x6 ^% b& Y! d8 b4 ^0 d' z" I我有兩部喎8 c) A* |$ B) ^2 |
咁我咪double懲罰??