foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
5 G$ x: R3 h6 Q. y港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
, M/ a: ?2 s* |  J; ?* i. [7 X! L之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
( b) R9 z- k, q, V2 H# o( b% I難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

9 ~9 j8 h' w" }3 }* H8 f

5 x2 \* t3 z" A: [% r特首有講過要封港台嗎？

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
. E& S1 ~/ u9 [1 v+ X& S+ m: Y+ z' H, U0 y4 M2 v
( q; n/ |, J( h5 p4 F& F+ x
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

7 v/ i' Y; B# B! j% b0 ]7 A  C2 ?# h  G) t" C6 i& t
=封港台?

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
7 V2 M3 H( c& G9 p/ ?7 ?0 a" b. d( b$ o% b3 Y) F* B
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

0 m6 N; O9 J! Y( }

- D' C1 N& P7 B7 y% S# Q5 t& K"如果"# \6 Z; @$ l9 R" l% J
3 x$ Y3 O7 K3 X0 D
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.