foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
6 C7 ^- b$ a: Y* C港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
! r6 [0 S9 _) |; Y% C$ B: s之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖. e+ h- F, ]: R+ S
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

2 t% y$ l* u& t5 c' j

- r) g% ^5 ^1 W) c8 e8 c特首有講過要封港台嗎？

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
, Q; `6 I3 e/ i; U
+ z5 G9 `0 F& q
% M& d5 _5 u% d: M之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

% ^) W( t9 E! [$ T- }3 |
6 ^' A% {: _# J  ~$ q$ R
=封港台?

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:9 U8 v% k' }1 O, ~$ y# F4 a
0 I6 Q4 z( f$ U: _, l2 i; d" N2 {( k+ s
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

- X' w% }# \' a9 D5 T
  e3 c9 H3 n8 r# p* P
"如果"1 q, c; x3 |. O" n& q: `- e, a
3 s7 T$ r, l& \( [& o, d
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.