slwong3

真可憐但冇法6 f- L# _7 ^" v$ W* D0 z
諗下有朝一日有條傻仔真係吞左棋盤吞瓜左時米又有人鬧爆. ?: [: c" X+ `( i
要怪就怪加陣太多怪獸加長訓練出一批智障兒童& `' Z* g% s3 d& R+ ]: N0 K
高智能低智商
; N2 v  i  m) a7 [( Q  ~" x咩聞所未聞既刀可以發生出黎$ c* i& T6 x5 k3 j4 N* \: ?
早年刀有單話有個細路係個水到腳瓜既池浸瓜左拉
* o( i  r) j1 k/ k所以加 ...
! d9 G" d2 b% q  T. r* S# i6 S) {5 rmnbvc 發表於 2011-11-10 06:22 PM

0 o; b1 P9 t% M( c; m

* R: V& H5 f5 P! uWell, to be honest, I think this case and the charge don't make any sense.( S& s1 S  Z- u: R1 w3 l2 c; a" A
$ U0 m. {' [. R1 }1 e; [) v
If you're saying the kids will eat the paper chess board....then the kids may also eat a piece of eraser, paper or even put tissue in the mouth.
+ z4 |. e' l' Y# qThere is possiblity that a kid will eat anything.: b; q" Q( L  \- k- i+ m$ y
You can't use the reason that the (paper is too thin) to charge the retail store.. [+ q5 j3 P- U5 ?& h
1 ?! e8 L6 E, I. {  i+ y
Besiders, the store owner is right, he didn't make this kind of chess board.
4 ~) \& C* I, ]& A- U( m6 @! |0 L" O3 Q
Eg. For example, if there is importing food that is infected or posioned, will they charge and punish the retail seller or the manufacturer?- Z5 ~% f9 e% Z- m9 Z6 S
The worst case is to ask the retail seller to stop selling such products and return them back to the manufacturer.