F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
! u$ M* y/ o9 I2 _+ [: {$ m7 l$ i6 t: uM is for his pride
! W0 f8 @" b$ q: }& ]/ a% a# T5 i2 qL is for visiting her lover
% g; x/ U( m/ u  xB is for money
/ K# S, K7 u7 G, r3 w# r4 G8 ]S is for sex* D/ w% ~: ?+ v' J! S5 X
except F, he can't get anything
# {8 x) A/ @7 j) R# F6 Dbut he just did something wrong for friends8 v$ S9 w2 L; ^' ^
therefore, I wound like to support F
" G7 p0 }1 Y$ M% j3 LActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
3 k, J+ Y4 N; |2 H4 ?
8 X# [+ W( N' i# F0 H; Cfrom good to bad
6 E" I8 `2 D% Q7 yF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
$ ^( V* |0 i" b( w/ s準時12:00
7 n, G- }& J" u# b2 N
( [. _$ @& W" o/ D" C' Y8 z1 j[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me- v. W3 S; F5 P9 b) x5 s
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
. J  o& C% R- q4 [5 J+ I1 f  y& s5 D' n) T
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
" _  h" G( n0 M' P" C) |" R! f# d& s0 K9 P5 Q+ O$ S) U
I believe this is very hard to be together
2 _0 c4 p7 T) @6 lbut I still trust that both of them can be together