F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves& x8 g* Y6 V0 }& m1 b
M is for his pride
. C( w5 W- X1 K* M. jL is for visiting her lover5 B* z' }& @, L" N3 u6 E
B is for money* n! S5 X* G' f. T7 J
S is for sex
" {+ j9 W" S; A# E4 Y: c) qexcept F, he can't get anything  R5 z- ~4 E6 X! ?6 ?  ~/ Y/ `& a1 ?
but he just did something wrong for friends
6 S1 ~% o! J1 E8 ~2 K5 ]+ O7 itherefore, I wound like to support F
5 X) X5 ?4 u3 H( M+ T- Q  v+ p/ ?( RActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything  c7 E1 o' t) ^: {% V) }: Q( s% d5 v

- U& U8 ~: t# m$ G& b4 n) t4 u, Gfrom good to bad8 V' ~( m9 x. L
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:: t, p+ w- L1 G
準時12:005 W% n+ A* `3 b3 m7 a
; G' C" X. l2 }; m2 O- W
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me; B+ U3 a. P* W* K  p8 o
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
! t" O/ x7 U  p: v2 r2 ?# n% l. p4 k3 P, {8 Y( _$ u* r" C
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?$ j; V! W: p! s, y) Y0 e. r
& a; _0 s$ _9 x) E5 N! R6 @
I believe this is very hard to be together
# V* x  m. p  H1 ?  k- lbut I still trust that both of them can be together