F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
" h' Z# c' @: b' |1 A  q' r1 mM is for his pride. n% r% M' A1 Q4 t+ z0 @4 Y! J' |
L is for visiting her lover- W" U: o  y6 U% n+ D( `
B is for money
( d/ q# V2 l  Y  e; W  O! k0 IS is for sex
: y) s' F: p1 G) u: Sexcept F, he can't get anything1 \" ?1 f. P% l. O# g
but he just did something wrong for friends; h- K6 {- n4 @! `6 m
therefore, I wound like to support F
, [3 Q4 a9 R4 V9 XActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything6 I  k3 P/ P, E+ i
1 x0 q" c. ]4 ^" ?7 T7 H' X# ?
from good to bad
4 U! C  @5 W! w1 A& S& _, hF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
" S+ q" S1 j) {4 {% u5 {準時12:00' P- d1 c, G! W- O

8 A" h  C2 e; ^' u9 T2 r6 i[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
* A/ n0 K- v, }; r* `I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case' R$ S& v. z! p
( h6 e' Y& x# }3 K
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?& m9 W& u) a, w) Y$ t: R
. O- S: d. J5 c6 X; Y5 K
I believe this is very hard to be together% h8 N# F7 c  L* t2 r$ t8 i. c
but I still trust that both of them can be together