F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves, P" L9 }1 @4 u# u+ ?
M is for his pride  n: q7 M7 }' x8 F. {( `* w  }8 Q
L is for visiting her lover; N& o( ^% R2 D; V: F
B is for money
' V- F  R' F& y5 J/ eS is for sex
0 ^# W7 y$ _% Bexcept F, he can't get anything. P! @8 o) q+ _- l% g7 K' A2 G
but he just did something wrong for friends5 S0 h2 k( D8 \5 Z7 E* I7 X
therefore, I wound like to support F
9 O# Q3 b! N% o* f% t# oActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
/ K1 ]6 f* Y. G# Y# l. ?6 ^) C0 w. t0 \) B! W! u, R  y4 i8 F& ^7 ]
from good to bad. \/ L4 {" O2 [- m0 d
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:5 u8 v; r2 J' s) ~) Z( E8 p) H
準時12:00. M% H/ K$ F% G) o# l

% t0 k+ N# F9 f1 V" A; x' V; t- }[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
; H+ Y+ f( D1 |7 h: gI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case$ |- |" _5 C/ j. |* i

* ^+ s% j% j, {8 f2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
9 ~/ f6 }3 ^& E3 t  K( N2 v) C3 G0 x$ Z( W( f  t
I believe this is very hard to be together% ?% w+ b' [- I# G9 }
but I still trust that both of them can be together