F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves6 Z* R8 p# F* h8 B- w
M is for his pride
% [7 A# l2 b6 g) Y! ?+ l) uL is for visiting her lover
3 m! O* b' R  W: b2 o& hB is for money7 r/ R. \" @1 o: `: q5 N9 F/ q; y3 q5 w
S is for sex
, ~5 t  ^6 Z! ?4 w+ @4 t, f! xexcept F, he can't get anything
6 q! J- U) X8 x+ a+ z2 ~- Ubut he just did something wrong for friends4 J, P0 W* ?2 T( B6 f. R, H5 R
therefore, I wound like to support F
0 u. r7 H. ^4 R, gActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything0 q% W# o# l6 {

3 U) a) u$ n# h& mfrom good to bad
4 s( L5 y% f$ oF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
/ J! [4 e# E' u9 e( R; _! [6 @  Q準時12:009 @9 `7 a8 \6 \

2 k/ _2 I* A  I' g  \  [8 i[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
' r$ E! w$ n; r0 o5 \( \3 y8 @8 v# LI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case  D$ X+ S2 J, F8 T" E
/ F/ v9 l- M" f. e+ l) ~
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?6 J3 }6 n* E! t5 B( B+ _
$ R+ `6 A6 \' {8 L) O
I believe this is very hard to be together! o" s; D* u5 U% [4 s% D! Z; X
but I still trust that both of them can be together