F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves( J5 m$ r- q. g. [8 t
M is for his pride+ X7 X  a. n- l* T
L is for visiting her lover- u6 X4 d3 f9 D6 J$ w9 n" Q1 N
B is for money) Q4 y/ t; x9 q; P
S is for sex
3 {! p! R* v! L  o9 lexcept F, he can't get anything
$ i: E* A, D1 o" }& jbut he just did something wrong for friends
7 K+ w5 I. }9 r$ Utherefore, I wound like to support F/ X; i; {. h- b# Y9 B! j2 C
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
/ e4 J" |5 w  `
3 o( Z' h9 J) o, F5 T4 qfrom good to bad
& B) C/ \4 I1 ~$ f. X( Y/ x7 ZF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
% d- f2 Q  ^" M6 D準時12:009 g/ }6 l. N$ ], U0 Y& |8 X
2 }: X  v: Y, f2 q
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
0 _$ `" U" N) Q- W5 ZI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case$ o2 n6 Q' E, F+ N8 A4 q

/ L1 B- W$ d4 |- [; b: ], Y, A2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
% Y3 d* D& _0 C' U+ a( h: p0 d) [& r$ V( Y) v, _- `
I believe this is very hard to be together
6 G$ u1 a3 @: _but I still trust that both of them can be together