F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
1 u& b/ V- C, M% U) R6 zM is for his pride
+ i0 h( Q1 ]5 U; |L is for visiting her lover5 _* D0 Y3 s" K2 X5 I, d* G: j" s9 U0 j
B is for money
; n& ]: X. H7 {. ~0 K# b! A& h" aS is for sex
1 y; t8 l& ^8 |. r# F: v% M+ Kexcept F, he can't get anything
. {4 H/ A$ f/ R1 J9 q! k" cbut he just did something wrong for friends1 Q/ `3 x7 y. z
therefore, I wound like to support F9 W; X4 ]' i* ~3 T. s% k& k4 g) }
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything. T# ]0 t, F% I+ U0 E0 u  P, D

+ Q9 Z; `4 S6 i  M. qfrom good to bad
( b+ V0 _1 n4 C; p  S, ?* ~- f; PF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
5 A/ [4 b" U1 {; U% h4 c- S準時12:00+ q4 {! q# O- ~

5 g1 T7 ~' P7 C) v+ A  i; e[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me9 D8 B+ i& P/ |  ^7 W6 |: C3 Y
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
' |: t1 a/ u% k1 ^2 z$ B8 L$ J% a- n; a1 D. U+ z
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
0 I: v$ n# k2 v6 n0 m1 z
7 Z  [/ o, g8 w( p) lI believe this is very hard to be together1 J9 E1 Z8 {- U6 P
but I still trust that both of them can be together