F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves: [, \  C4 I/ H1 i8 n* P
M is for his pride3 r6 ?9 r' r5 [5 M6 B" k1 d
L is for visiting her lover
. E, q1 Y- g9 L: k; Q( VB is for money! \0 g0 B' z. P& L+ p, e
S is for sex, Y* W# J9 n+ f( `/ X7 U
except F, he can't get anything
! h# C. d4 s# ^- L" X, x/ Tbut he just did something wrong for friends
( ^- w5 F# A' K9 l' `" [therefore, I wound like to support F7 u; w! Z' ?' e$ c% a
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything0 `2 t2 `% O% H: ?0 O
5 K: X" C5 S4 H  {. g7 x" N
from good to bad2 B  C$ ~2 k6 T2 i) v& }& a" H
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:! @# b: F$ v1 v. @
準時12:004 \+ n/ D+ ^8 V4 M/ e
6 @  |! o) L2 M
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me6 X, f" i# R) ~$ N. ^
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case: \6 P. X3 y1 ?- z
3 T! H9 L" |# Z
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
0 i* O4 f6 @4 g( y! @! I1 Y2 O, _. ~' o' F& G" A9 h& }
I believe this is very hard to be together; Q- s, y4 N6 h' J% ~
but I still trust that both of them can be together