F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves+ b9 v8 [6 A5 y; B! Q% |
M is for his pride; h9 r5 r  ]# P$ S1 ]' e
L is for visiting her lover
3 j' v5 l: Y8 N7 LB is for money
5 m$ ]9 O& y/ {, H5 rS is for sex
$ B4 Y4 l0 x: |8 Fexcept F, he can't get anything# `+ z  T% _6 d- ]; f- {* Y; ^
but he just did something wrong for friends
( a+ [  u. G/ g, Y" W/ M, htherefore, I wound like to support F
$ o# `% V* W+ y! DActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything4 i1 T7 v, Q- Q! `9 ?# @4 }
) @* K3 R6 ~/ v) ~2 G% \& m
from good to bad# N/ U0 d5 }6 ?) m
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
2 o% M7 [+ T* N, [; D5 O* Q5 k準時12:00/ E0 i# l5 y2 G, A
+ M8 \! q* c* ?+ O& n
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me9 q2 G/ e' z2 Y: [
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
- X! m6 d' h. y
* x- z2 f" [0 s% z4 ~5 Q2 e2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?  E, {- q' J- K6 y; n9 g
( a/ V: B# \' m" d# u5 H: x
I believe this is very hard to be together
" {4 M, c  u8 [1 N$ I& sbut I still trust that both of them can be together