F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
% D' d" ]2 p$ c4 q' B* {M is for his pride
' A! r2 L# P, D5 dL is for visiting her lover! w+ B$ u) Q# @9 n1 C
B is for money
. t* _; Q& k5 ]: t+ ?S is for sex3 _7 j# A7 s6 U
except F, he can't get anything- ~4 R% h$ l. K3 d! r" l1 x) k
but he just did something wrong for friends
  W) w2 ^, ~1 Atherefore, I wound like to support F
+ {, W% {, ?7 o2 i* t" r! N+ n# \9 LActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
3 G' i  @' h; d5 ^
! \/ [5 M1 W- rfrom good to bad+ E, Y/ M( t! ]; G# F2 ~
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
" A; \) h4 B. `6 b準時12:00: r3 P" S+ p  s# S( Y$ M! b) o; Q& t0 l0 B

! ]# r0 I) k0 a8 y) o[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
! R  b8 \, s- o' q. jI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
1 S# o8 j! b7 _, }, W$ n
+ k) a8 b1 u; l- g9 c1 j1 n% ^  \2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
; o4 ?0 H0 o3 x4 S& ~
/ c  a: w) t# S) t- |I believe this is very hard to be together
! f" C! r( n( L4 A) Dbut I still trust that both of them can be together