F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
! k/ r$ H7 R* F/ {$ f4 i0 {0 JM is for his pride4 d7 g) f" [' P* M# R* z8 z+ C
L is for visiting her lover# L+ ?$ q0 d3 j) L% p: x
B is for money
$ D0 P8 J3 i# i! |( vS is for sex7 U# V6 Y& x# F3 _+ ^; v/ i
except F, he can't get anything
* a* G7 `, h# O# ~" ?but he just did something wrong for friends
! _& I. s+ x, d# a7 h5 Z7 j" N3 D6 K  I8 Gtherefore, I wound like to support F
. ]! `8 s1 ?, mActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
. |3 G7 y+ K: ]) W+ x1 g% G
) H0 y! q' B7 G- lfrom good to bad
) j5 C8 x0 e0 @3 M- oF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
+ W* A0 \* k7 \1 a4 h準時12:00
6 M" ]4 q+ J6 k9 N5 W8 e  g- _; u- P0 c
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me$ O- Q; t; [9 ?! H/ R6 V
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case8 y, ~3 f7 u) q: Y* z
' r/ l* y8 u, Y! O" X) L  d5 u& J$ N
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
; `; c/ L8 ^% p3 {
4 a0 P' @; a8 x/ T7 R7 I( zI believe this is very hard to be together: \3 k- S7 |0 s! a$ E
but I still trust that both of them can be together