F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves. z* x7 {0 s$ n: A% D
M is for his pride9 ?( a' V, ]: E/ U: M* i0 e- K
L is for visiting her lover6 t0 F5 e7 w% ?0 b7 G# h
B is for money/ d1 j8 X* P  e1 \
S is for sex
, v6 r5 z& ?6 L0 E% u! b6 Kexcept F, he can't get anything$ |, @2 c. m4 W: h: f+ R
but he just did something wrong for friends
3 B% L6 \, @$ [! |therefore, I wound like to support F
0 y& y' S3 S, f0 S' m; P7 ]Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything7 n6 p5 e' @, T. l* ~# j

0 j# a2 c( |: S4 m/ t9 cfrom good to bad7 [$ x: J7 }1 @, p* Q3 F1 b* f
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
* x! h3 _- K0 }( z0 P0 E準時12:00
4 ~6 }8 L+ t" v- d! ^
0 u5 x4 E) N; f8 W7 P3 ~5 x" R& Z[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
" N- @% V! ?1 w- `& II had posted my answer before, and I am in this case, ]1 C8 ?* R2 m& g
8 j3 i% F* W9 J; I9 `5 v
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
! ]  n$ r+ k2 P8 l. v1 j: c* X" ?+ z: s# p7 G6 F
I believe this is very hard to be together4 D; U( X1 x% z4 p
but I still trust that both of them can be together