F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
( g& v* G& p. u  d1 A3 UM is for his pride9 L* a5 ?2 R) ?8 Y, a' s% s
L is for visiting her lover9 j  n6 `$ c- Z+ ~" ~) k
B is for money
; b& K" W$ n$ [  I& c8 MS is for sex
# U5 o4 s; z+ x& aexcept F, he can't get anything
8 r% q8 ~+ l: G& c- c/ {2 tbut he just did something wrong for friends6 [8 ?$ X! b" Y' K& l2 Z
therefore, I wound like to support F& Q6 u. |0 |' v0 Z6 E0 X
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
2 E2 J: ^/ \: S, d2 S
6 T4 K8 q1 z  n8 _from good to bad
3 k6 u: t( ]( `  q1 sF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:7 F( x8 K; v' c" v  ^- Y# f" l& X$ r
準時12:00
2 K6 r. B3 H. G; u( U5 a7 d& e( V2 e3 U4 V
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
' h  i4 k; ?. V2 }3 C" gI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
0 O% P, Q8 m6 E3 j3 y; u, ]7 C
4 O  H+ Y0 g; I2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?6 J0 j5 P  M- P2 e. m% W

) A0 k) T3 B6 c: WI believe this is very hard to be together4 U* s+ S3 P9 P# ~0 Z; A2 k; r
but I still trust that both of them can be together