F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
1 Z0 {3 s6 I3 p' lM is for his pride
* L' h' M) x+ z2 K5 `L is for visiting her lover
) O' C0 H. }; l: s  QB is for money
# o: D6 D2 O" NS is for sex
2 ~+ W1 j" D4 {0 I/ F. q* X0 P+ Nexcept F, he can't get anything3 C$ E$ g- ?# ]" b1 B8 ^
but he just did something wrong for friends+ P# w! t7 R! v6 [. w
therefore, I wound like to support F
! n% H# W0 I; c: t8 ~2 OActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything8 Y0 N* F* m8 @: }2 F/ o: n

- w" C1 w6 D, Rfrom good to bad* N: @+ j- K' J- F
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
/ n! Y5 N+ ]. l. ?& D準時12:002 l9 f; D0 T( \/ Z
9 y0 U7 Q3 F5 j& h" p8 J3 v
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
1 V; s$ a  l2 SI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case1 B) c  K& ~& N8 o/ @
3 j" X, L1 D  S: `; W( Q
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
& f/ ~0 x) K$ E. J8 L( |$ D' j, j: Q, r" q6 j! O) i& }
I believe this is very hard to be together& S7 R3 x! n2 u* a! C
but I still trust that both of them can be together