F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves5 \8 W4 I- H1 s4 ?% B: q% b
M is for his pride
1 h2 q) c$ d" sL is for visiting her lover
5 X# }' e: Z- |$ |: `, Y2 }4 \B is for money
. V3 ?5 g9 Q2 r; ?, I! J1 L1 c& w8 US is for sex& l- I: R9 {7 ?+ T  S
except F, he can't get anything
! g+ ~( M! g9 C1 ^; \1 h  R4 F6 T# @but he just did something wrong for friends
2 j# I0 r4 g; |! a: Itherefore, I wound like to support F8 i& |! {( K- i/ z+ j
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything' R  H5 p+ M! A9 j
2 K! [' g" {% T/ q  H' ^, K. @% @+ l
from good to bad5 j8 Z/ E  h  y- B5 J: G
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
/ e$ v* g4 [& ]準時12:007 E1 @9 S* L, h, H# |; r: I7 q: c& l

( E* u1 e: |; A/ `3 `: |  X[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
  M( v1 L  h0 B- l- {I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case6 V$ a( a$ T9 L: `: O  {7 ]( C

5 B. z8 }* h1 @* A$ E1 j: v' X5 O$ B2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
/ P% b# u2 q" ?1 p2 R4 h1 w: _* G% p& O# s0 l* M( Y
I believe this is very hard to be together
" i) q! _) j  |& U- t) U% rbut I still trust that both of them can be together