jsqaure99

true say, good example.9 V. y3 P# k1 b/ ~: {, K+ I+ q/ Z
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.$ h3 F5 T) X0 e+ c
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.5 v- O4 C- Y$ j1 a& X  m7 c
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕( \6 @9 I5 S8 ~) Y( C, \7 f  N* T
NO OFFENCE 7 ~. g. r6 l/ l" p9 W. a! J
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
! z9 ~" f- t5 Y  F3 P係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢5 \# H1 K; d$ k  T' l( v
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢0 r2 ]. E2 {1 w2 `5 J! u, m3 _2 ~
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
' B/ G* E/ j% |3 r* ]我唔知
8 s- r1 C3 \2 X3 W但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
: Q8 n: j& X# ~* O會唔會覺得未夠班呢! C% q- t9 m8 p" b' N
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附$ Y9 g- ^; x* A. a+ t
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇4 j/ @! |# N' p) ]; g9 L8 w
又點解釋
3 S1 f, k& E4 h
& Z( l3 W8 z" A  J- \仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
$ _) }7 @9 p' Y4 A) d以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
9 l: J( A2 l8 \+ i% i6 c家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
. e7 B( H, a  t1 g6 k$ j. g講得好5 [$ O7 e5 k# H+ _
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈! f* f" d+ A# @# f
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:& [+ D8 `' ~9 F2 T- ]/ ~1 m6 _8 J
: R* S8 i0 }$ \' ^, j3 z
3 r' ?- W, l' n# G: i* ^
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據$ x$ K7 z" S9 `% ^! a- l$ q

7 W7 n4 s2 y9 ?2 C% z用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 G; X* z6 S  s; b3 [8 V  c
% X& j0 V/ l) K& Y0 O

# e, F, B* K. h! ]# |唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗