jsqaure99

true say, good example.& i3 ^- u4 A- K2 w( ?; A
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
6 d, C. z4 V2 g) \0 {trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
; {4 T8 p! x1 g2 J* ?9 ^5 _/ Nno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕7 l7 g7 P! b0 ~) ?- }; i. r
NO OFFENCE ! W8 M$ c. t% b3 j* y( i% c8 M& T
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
( g' a" G/ p) }7 E+ S係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢4 [  C2 E: @5 H& `1 x
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢# P( w2 c" H" }1 x0 X2 v  K* V3 U
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢) y  R% V! H& w' O5 o- S
我唔知% ^9 `3 v* s  j3 C0 O, \
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐0 V% W' I  S! U/ E# r
會唔會覺得未夠班呢' S" |* M5 I" X, }3 i( b1 z1 u4 I) @
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
' x5 s% L1 j' U. c但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
$ p+ B. [; r. m- V- h又點解釋
' y1 @. T) L( u
* e0 J. `& ~3 I% i& y仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
. k, w- Z" K0 l" V4 {. {以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到  W& n( C) X: r, ]
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材% s& d6 r) N/ r" a* A  m1 C
講得好
9 u5 \- g5 ^( c6 L8 x% H, p4 R仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
( e$ S) u/ M+ |* @8 E- u9 Q6 `+ t我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
9 e$ P+ m- `9 _0 m
) D  G& \1 ]9 s; W) o1 `$ X/ d. a- k
' M  k$ n4 ?. v! [証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
+ p% H# y8 s2 O* Z3 ^; K
4 \5 a/ M0 Z+ w0 o' a用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

: y3 r4 w7 F. U0 m; u
7 E& i# B+ O, e, e& e3 z3 V9 _* e% I; W9 q  z3 \  i2 ]) ~9 |3 J" j  U" K
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗