jsqaure99

true say, good example.& G' E- o3 @# g$ B) F- m& N
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
' H8 M: n0 R# }trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.2 N( b7 c8 [) r' m/ i
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
  Q7 @6 n* L9 C: Y+ C* M: g  ZNO OFFENCE . _! H% ]- R) K: B/ v
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣: E3 w& M, {$ |/ @
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢8 H1 o& H* F0 ~! r  J
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
4 V: ~! @8 d! Y' o" h1 eIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
; u1 c7 a: B2 ^2 g8 F: ]5 R# E% }# j我唔知5 v. G0 ^  E! ~9 c, F
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐: q% }8 ~) g; O5 h+ S
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
% |3 y# k7 I/ U4 H0 C人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
5 D+ q! \8 B/ ?' H+ a3 n! Q但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇( N( P, q$ h! ^0 X% R
又點解釋
6 U$ X/ K. j3 \& k4 C0 A$ j5 c
; W! D5 P% G1 u5 o仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回4 \! H: x1 c! K$ m! C7 [9 i
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
/ s& f7 ~0 ]9 y/ z0 R' k7 b* |家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
$ _0 x' q( B; U: J. r0 H( n講得好% I3 S5 a* u* ^/ b5 U. S- R
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
6 [+ r6 A) g3 F- N; c$ o我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
& y/ ?) J' x# W4 H7 b$ S0 G7 x, x4 g/ h- O, l, _

7 b- a0 q1 X1 T5 d証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
2 c% N( d8 e. E$ J% _9 A' C; N3 w3 z7 A3 V& p7 K
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 U/ W7 t0 n0 Z' d' ^

4 @$ C  T$ b( o! ~2 a% V6 X9 m( }5 j8 V8 E
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗