jsqaure99

true say, good example.3 ~/ n8 }" q% u: {
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.3 q# e$ v$ j8 H
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.# O) l4 [, n* c; U1 j- |
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
- r8 A4 t; @( x; R, U& KNO OFFENCE
/ @3 o' s$ q4 U6 T* K但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣7 s+ T; n0 R: y9 X; w( i9 h
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢1 j0 g# R+ {  w+ g3 S+ J
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
/ w2 w' t: i5 p4 B8 j  A; c0 CIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
6 @; E+ x/ l+ g我唔知
: @7 |) u- H) p' _1 D但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐* D. }7 M3 `* e3 d4 |
會唔會覺得未夠班呢( j. Y9 D+ }# K5 C# k0 Q, L
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
% i1 H6 e: F5 Y: D+ _但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
# @6 p& z' C6 p又點解釋! X4 c1 @0 c1 W

. y% {/ t) `- I4 t7 q仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回5 ^% z: N, O; h3 F2 r
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到0 C* ?$ f, q9 `" F, H
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
" W9 E+ m/ _6 j7 z4 }& [  r, I講得好
/ s; I2 N1 e. H- [3 X6 B仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈4 n$ c. u3 B- s, ?4 M
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:3 R; F( u& n5 j: Y6 Y8 }0 @4 F, _: F

$ \6 K3 ~$ K& ^* b
' b; z- D1 V- ?1 o! V証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
6 y! `' N: m+ e( A" e7 {) ~% T$ _7 m, v
8 H- w0 w4 v( N! }( L; I3 {: ?用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 m4 m6 N3 B3 K8 ?7 k

* Z& L/ }) N; x; \' `7 }0 U9 f8 T; ]. T4 f9 A( i5 }1 c% T7 X$ ~
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗