jsqaure99

true say, good example.4 N* K1 [. B" L) k+ H" q
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.# U4 u1 Y! _9 y7 M4 j
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.( ^6 {2 @$ w* S
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕& I7 ^2 I, ~4 l  u3 t+ ^& A
NO OFFENCE
& p. z* S+ u% v% e8 }5 s0 o但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
& {3 |/ Q6 V) ]  L; p3 G係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
& x% A; [: |) X/ v# S+ K4 X6 r  [. rIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢. X3 {/ I5 o: u5 U  D# t6 u) v
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
  F  l. I/ I, D( ~" e我唔知  p$ G" O! J$ X' ^; Z& S& g1 c
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐/ a- v, U- |1 D. P( e
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
9 K6 U; N4 U& A2 D. C人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附% K9 p6 k) ^% e$ _2 A3 p
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
0 C* e. w4 |) F) u. C' c- v又點解釋' }  T9 W7 {9 m, w! g1 q1 I
1 {/ Q" U4 b, z
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
0 ~2 ]. ^+ Z' i5 j  [% _; @  j以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到6 j" s6 K1 @! [4 l6 P7 f: L( P
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
; G+ B/ }, K. G* Y講得好( C& f! n5 q* |& c% w' N# J3 H2 e& D. z
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈9 Y" P6 n# E8 J/ s% u
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
* i9 M' {8 h# E+ e6 c
! q) r5 X/ a$ t' S* k3 l* B7 W0 q% ]2 W+ C1 I! T$ n" ?* B% W; ], R
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
+ h. X" f$ r8 ]! ^* ]# Z. {$ A4 A4 K
* `8 Y6 K3 j# Y! a用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

: M+ A( `6 }# L) k+ s6 X: r5 z
/ I! T4 ]0 v4 N/ y% U  G  W* X5 T/ a

. J7 e; S- }& y# p/ p唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗