jsqaure99

true say, good example.
  }7 s; w) @  l, {5 }% m9 Tby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.2 y/ S8 ^& H! r  o* B* r8 }/ v
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
( k# b' {. S( y* n; Hno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
. e: j( m, @  N% n7 e# `$ i' ^. INO OFFENCE ' @& p  f3 N! ?. p* l5 D& d, M
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
  ~8 [+ P1 r% m3 z. p6 @" C, u  G係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢8 Z& z, z9 _) t! X( x' I2 g, }
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
) V: B; F/ L2 B% k0 gIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
; x+ n5 a8 j/ m5 l# A我唔知/ _6 ?2 Z6 {* o3 Q8 ~
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐  t' `- [; z" o% N4 W
會唔會覺得未夠班呢# |- ]# r( h) C
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附* Y0 O6 `, W. F; Z& d
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇# x& l, L* l2 a2 x  k: ^/ c
又點解釋3 l' @, h1 i' i7 R* i! \7 {
$ R- m) ?9 S5 P5 K
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回- C1 {/ ]$ [" E2 [
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
  K) ], F: i4 i家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
/ q3 C6 }* T7 V3 @講得好
4 P% ~* @% x6 e! D仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
5 D+ F8 D4 b3 o6 w: Y( B我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
" c+ `+ K1 K0 k8 `, n/ L4 t9 p' C% u/ z
6 H" K" |& D  t% ?
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據: l7 \, r- X3 y: x; a

" ]! F# Z& H3 S3 M% u$ n, Q4 f用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

: l; u4 J7 Z7 }- X. _% z

# s' Q& c% Y% ^5 x, }, o& w. M3 N/ v
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗