jsqaure99

true say, good example.
3 D8 I5 }8 ]! H! L+ X7 C! ^2 N4 F: @# |0 {by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
& g" p, u4 d$ Y/ m  vtrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.$ b: o6 ]* e1 s: ^8 l* D2 y3 q. V) M
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕, a: R  x: {( I! N5 i0 i
NO OFFENCE * }8 \- i5 ^0 \# _* J8 v
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣2 q( d: Z3 u8 p+ R  R; N
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
( M2 H2 k6 k9 o/ H) N2 c7 v) c2 T( JIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢, _8 [* S1 P0 z4 `% }* F; }0 j
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢- U5 N( V+ z0 z' J1 x  [& @
我唔知
: `! d# e2 W8 c# o5 \但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐. p+ X" n1 y! v" A
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
* c: ?6 x7 w5 o. g  Z5 d( B人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
  l* U+ U6 h1 f% Y- k但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
3 W9 |6 @) U( h7 P又點解釋
/ R1 v6 z, T: B  p
( N& s' j- A' n+ U+ X仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回7 p6 e7 S4 Z2 ^' Q7 r
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
* ~$ S5 p6 t$ v0 _+ ~家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材- K; x( q; i+ N; |7 \
講得好
% P5 V% o+ Q" U8 t9 ^) l) |仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈# m4 J2 f4 U. \; Z/ \( P- `4 e9 D
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:: K# y, J0 @& u8 ^
- i4 b) f/ X# ?
4 ~" t. k) G8 Y- o& N: U. v
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據1 u! h( y1 ~" @* M# {

1 m& |2 b# D2 w% y6 l$ \8 j! T用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

1 ^0 P/ {$ f: v

! C: M) x* v% @5 V  B0 @; z0 i( T+ J) H+ C. t2 J
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗