jsqaure99

true say, good example.* C9 l- }7 \8 j6 R6 u4 m
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
: a2 m) ^. C3 q  l& E+ a& Ptrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
) p3 [/ J6 T7 x7 Xno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
. w' E; W  v) h5 V8 x: z: ^: iNO OFFENCE 9 t. c8 C# @( M  B/ s- \
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
' P4 G: k' a" Y& x% B: y係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
0 x+ h# D- M; G; NIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
' j' j2 G; F' a2 @3 \+ N, UIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢4 w/ m; L5 h' a
我唔知$ b) G! s: s  V5 f" C8 N+ Y
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
6 F( b2 L( d7 w4 j0 E0 w會唔會覺得未夠班呢
( ?) _& l3 Z# r* M/ }8 l人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
1 B' G( [5 i% g但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇  I( Q: Z, E; |9 e) L& h/ h* H
又點解釋
1 m6 `; b6 j& b  E8 s0 k' A  h+ P+ V6 [8 B
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回! H8 x$ Q- O# ?8 A% P. W* k
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
7 j6 p/ T1 t; _! R$ a( ?家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材* u* c0 P5 |  ^  p" s& \3 ~
講得好6 I( r8 I$ t3 l; i
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈' P/ s* [9 l4 g0 ^: P; |' E
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:) d% n5 W! u: K7 ]! f
! |, |% {+ U/ S5 w  _
+ d0 A8 t  L- `6 r0 x
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
# C& c6 X' ^* ^" {
! S$ n* K. L8 ~4 N. g0 c用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

: t" b! ^5 ^) L7 c

. [3 U& [- d# M! y- [+ G" c% @: V" }9 i6 R8 W
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗