jsqaure99

true say, good example.
" x* U: N' B4 L! j" l& E9 \by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.6 t4 p# N$ d! W# ^* u+ I* d
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.) G# y/ {0 G4 H+ t1 [+ Z. G$ t) S
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
' Z6 q3 }1 R9 i6 W9 A% z2 q3 z& _8 o2 wNO OFFENCE & h6 s: I8 b6 ^/ o5 p6 X% @% W6 P
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
8 z1 W6 G2 S* r$ g9 L9 ^; [! c* j係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢" [' C# f+ l- v$ p! g7 P
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢( D0 o4 ^, |2 O2 C
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢% w/ L, `2 Z$ }* Z
我唔知) h6 O3 l- Z# n0 T/ }8 ]
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐! r) Y+ e& a& n4 l8 f
會唔會覺得未夠班呢; r7 \' {: W* ^3 W
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
$ @5 ^. D% m0 M+ E/ J0 J) W但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
: a% w0 M8 W: Z' ]又點解釋0 w1 V9 L. ]; P- l( j

$ B! ^$ G: l/ B+ L6 t! `$ D7 O仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
/ ]8 P. u4 X8 n% d. V8 A2 Z以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
) L; S" G3 q4 J# I! S4 U家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材4 T, n9 q* A/ j' i* o- \2 I
講得好9 `: M- l2 u2 V& E* y+ D
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈3 I9 Q; m5 C: n8 N$ I* P
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:! B$ H2 j8 k- U
7 \& h  ^  l9 ~' H- r5 n0 `
' J1 g5 R; o! D1 m
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據. W" G! D7 c/ ]( L! u1 r
% D$ z8 A- p% A1 L4 c5 f- Y
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

: N0 j% j1 }2 o- K0 s' Q* p9 R2 C1 |' g) L2 W0 k- o2 T4 e9 q
- n" I/ @+ v1 p, T
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗