sk

Here are my suggestions on your approach:- E+ C: [' G! _
1.        Your letter portraits a Pope with negative attitude towards changes. Is that fair to the Pope of that time? What did he really do?
! [1 N! A1 ]" i/ y2.        Science advance, and social injustice are facts. But are they really related to church? Or people just blamed everything to church like HK people blame everything to HK gov’t?
1 B" O4 L. H  O3.        Could he modify the church belief to fit in the changing world- like Mr. Tang of China in the ’80?

sk

Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-11-19 08:24 AM:
% v$ M1 C3 g- H+ _1 K2 F: [
6 h8 }$ {! B% h9 t2.        Science advance, and so...

+ L. o4 U, ~8 _2 H1 U

6 _6 C5 g7 H5 @  f5 ^% }4 ~Your reasoning is ok. I just think "To execute one as a warning to a hundred" is a very negative reaction and there are other ways that Pope can view the situation. That's why I suggested point #1, and #3 in post #3.
& j7 y, M5 d5 O$ Q2 g- A9 F
; Z& R9 z/ |+ y4 k/ H) H$ ?[ Last edited by sk on 2006-11-19 at 03:30 PM ]