fatfatdragon

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-8-2 11:09 AM:( H0 F: `! o  f' A+ Q4 j( F
4 m1 ~. B. ?0 n" b) l& h% s
邊個?邊個?

6 e( n+ |% `. M4 n
+ c" D7 V+ G  K! Q. X/ D
x2

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-8-2 11:10 AM:. N1 g: M" F' _7 |% |) X/ y6 j% s
: _& \9 Z5 t6 l2 F7 {" b4 p/ I- Y. l
見到圖..但未收左大俠pm...

6 `0 Q8 C; H( \, B+ V

! T. p( e" d- Q1 v6 L1 o: ]. R: B嗰日佢通宵, 之後未見過人......

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-8-2 11:10 AM:6 u2 F9 A5 s% V4 [1 ~* J: s6 k

! U2 J( M0 [' Q) N7 N. A/ ?誰?????

& A! z& `8 G- R  [  r0 K7 Q: z

' E3 O* `9 ?: s2 ~1 h
' [' U2 U& b$ Y/ h2 [- L鍾意又雞又鴨叫的人 (joke)

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by 將拍之 at 2005-8-2 11:13 AM:
1 Q5 P) W' e; I) q. ]9 k5 F哥哥, victor同老亨响時事區開火

* ^/ @6 Z+ e8 |( D  Z8 x8 j# V; W$ U, [5 Z1 O5 ]% l6 D
一個年少氣盛, 一個老馬有火. 好難搞. 等佢地自己嚟解決.
& [7 P" F' r1 m" l(佢地好清楚呢度d rules, 應該冇事)

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-8-2 11:14 AM:$ m0 I4 X+ N* K0 L& d
- {) l" {3 R$ m. e
甘你有冇見到我個留言

6 q# t: _- N, X

+ C; g6 u9 c; l3 v& t9 p評分方法, 有少少意見, 不過小孩有另一套想法. 唔想有矛盾, 所以冇寫.

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by johnwu at 2005-8-2 11:18 AM:3 r' E% B; c" ?# V9 q0 Z
8 q0 y, `, H% ^$ C' l# F6 @
support vic vic

& Y+ p8 v* X! l8 D
8 V. n1 I, H4 H7 u: d3 N<==== 中立 (牆頭草)
( G5 ?' U6 a% ?/ @/ d* `support 中國人的尊嚴 (亨), support 較理性寫法 (vic) 2 Z* ]. \" n5 d8 [$ H2 M
所以兩面都唔理. 其實睇咗少少, 覺得為鬧而鬧.

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-8-2 11:20 AM:% K' Y5 C+ }4 g, j9 d6 Y

& N7 e% Z. R: i9 S甘你見到佢時幫我叫佢留一留~~

& ^0 e' f# p, o8 t# G  p" O: }+ N6 U6 g% x
好難, 已經寫了出來, 而且小孩都幾直和主觀, 好難講~~~

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by johnwu at 2005-8-2 11:25 AM:; A: |" K2 c9 O& x8 ]

  x$ F1 n7 e, P5 x3 V* U7 J, T0 H) f" G
亨冇乜point, 得個"字"大

3 ^( b$ Q# I& d! r+ t/ R
! f5 L. w0 |; g4 ^/ `4 n/ t
佢寫嘢去得太盡, 就算有 point 都比人覺得太主觀和火爆. 先入為主都覺得他說的唔啱聽. (大部份人都想面面俱圓)

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-8-2 11:27 AM:
- X5 \" V$ ^# Y! E' M" D% W; F2 g* J- c5 |
甘我自己定~~~~~~一了百了~~~我話咩話咩~~

( A+ f0 w  \4 @- O- G( L4 k7 e; O
! ?! J: }# i/ X: Q; J+ B
如果想主觀地客觀 (<-- 幾有 feel)
# |5 b% P* n# N! w- b可以試下將評分 分唔同方面 例如$ y; }% L% f& Z* ]4 a2 c" C
- 內容
4 d, n& ^9 Q% `$ q$ g) z- 原創性$ e* C( I) [( b4 ~; p
- 感想表達( f; L/ u0 }% V, d6 Y  U6 P
- 吸引人去看/ @; P9 Q5 Z5 r1 R& d8 a8 [

. f/ `" Q2 u7 ?/ G: }- }/ t% V想比人愈客觀感覺, 可以加多d方向. 不過要有心理準備好煩./ |: o% `7 F& @! J5 ~0 }8 M! ^  S

4 o; m7 x$ Q0 B+ E# u另外更高明方法是黑箱作業. 你或幾個人話事唔好比其他人知點選
7 ]! h% {, K6 `2 h( G) Q, e/ `( {% l# l9 ]# k& x0 F# g
最後方法, 或者可以跟小孩提議, 人人加相同fun (但可能影響威信, 同另某些覺得攪活動變唔開心)$ v( ?* p: V0 b% ]* m/ u

& j3 P, ^( g" e" F9 j( a死野, 最後都比你呃咗寫d意見出嚟 =.="

fatfatdragon

Originally posted by tenmadio at 2005-8-2 11:30 AM:$ @5 L4 s- U9 ?1 `# ]/ ~% l

3 ]# {7 \+ r% \4 l3 P9 R$ kwe will support you

! ^& L9 F2 y, g6 G0 V7 E
# s7 n# |& _! q: `- m! px2 可能幾好方法 fulll support) y$ r$ N6 k$ Y& ~
(最初我諗是由所有 冇玩的版主 黑箱投票 )