coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:( t0 g& w- i) {! |. l
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 R8 [/ |* H5 V/ {1 \. `% M

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:. L: s$ U4 k+ k- [" `
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 |- C/ a) s3 V. b* m參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
5 W7 H6 V1 q  y& p6 P
( F1 m8 e* i& ~& M無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~. `1 T. h. E, c% K/ `" l- B3 g

* f* w3 Q5 j/ ?& K: v5 }請珍惜會員戶口!~  d# u( M" {# N) g+ \( n
; g+ u3 [+ e9 s0 r# C( W

$ K; s+ }  c# T6 q# x. s
& e# t. D% P8 E" d' P$ e3 g: X$ r7 M) q% t# z
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:7 n; E5 Y3 ^& f' B5 ]5 l4 r, T
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 x, Q$ i) B8 _. O6 q% T8 U* Y+ ]

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
3 W  Y$ b, \, y  U1 @我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

/ a0 P% K% y+ Q+ |& M3 L: P  @

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:& x5 A& P/ B9 f/ s' s- {

7 k4 @, w: u7 f2 H! o立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
0 s( ]0 ]4 B8 M咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

( q  ?  g) d6 l呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ : g" P$ |1 B: M, n
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
- T4 x3 P, W; U! ~, C% E9 _5 _9 M有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~