coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:( ]/ {2 R& I* G, A. n
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

# }" O: Q+ R+ P4 D( U

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
% r6 H2 F8 E, B$ |* U. g2 K( _$ W我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

) l& ]" h# n- c2 r' Y
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
' I% T9 w. k6 ?' H* U9 |  B
" D: }. K& l" Z- v+ k: w無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~0 A, U5 D  n/ ]1 d" q

, \) x. @3 l  }請珍惜會員戶口!~
: _/ V0 F3 {7 a) k9 |
6 F/ w4 z! w" @  Q8 X, T. _, y& `$ P  ~" @1 ?
5 x- g+ p- N/ [& \
2 O. i, V3 y4 }+ D
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
2 W* N! u: `" A6 P& V我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

+ M# F/ E, v3 A- ]! y. L0 M

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
9 M( @7 p3 d- h1 Y9 z7 r5 ]4 e! w我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

4 w; f, d: L1 p6 Z. t

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:4 i. F( T# ?- Q, d
/ F7 E. S, d) @" p% t# R
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
7 x# F3 {* ~" B& K8 p2 ~% K1 G: _咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

& z4 V& Z8 _! L( X" v- o; ]6 u5 ?0 f呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
' \% n& G' D6 [- S; n0 h& [$ h成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~' p/ S* h& w3 {) b
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~