coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:" _- P5 Z# o, x& V
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 b0 n( {( s" ]; ]. A

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
4 A5 O/ T. L  r' E$ L# E我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

, f: @4 W+ S2 i+ Y參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
/ M3 W9 {7 M/ s6 B$ {) D) q: A
$ y( f" e( i3 q: t/ T$ z2 f9 }- Q0 V無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~. O9 l! G: \1 e( l( k
' ?2 S6 ]; M. y& Q0 I" m4 [$ v: k
請珍惜會員戶口!~
/ r" g- e( j  Y) x5 d; ?8 z; g& v8 [8 A  Z& s

' y; O& P, E- F: Q1 Q6 b5 t
8 J; M. _8 g4 Y: ?4 ^& O4 R4 T9 m* q6 m! W* P. [
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
7 t2 p9 c7 n, ~  }2 ?- N我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

( l" `' x' L- |" y  J/ w

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
3 R9 g* i, e: {  I: e8 c我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

/ o3 J8 y$ C  G* N7 }

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:" l4 w7 N5 l6 S7 C9 I1 |
/ O0 U6 F$ @; a- a- J. f
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。9 w$ H8 S$ `: u1 T" L/ g
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

3 ]* W5 n' H) ]  b5 q呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
+ ~" j, C1 \+ @成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~' }8 _3 s, Q0 M, W9 F7 d
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~