coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
* S' y% N( V! q" R我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

2 ]6 S5 g2 F$ g/ e$ [9 O7 r& W6 ^

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
5 P9 e9 b; y; x我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

" x, a) L! V3 q% }% v6 s, p參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
* I' \* R8 p4 P+ F% h
+ @9 i+ g! q) u5 i8 z( i6 j無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~1 u3 V5 f8 T' e6 f1 a
5 b( p2 z6 S/ F
請珍惜會員戶口!~
8 K9 w/ ~  [8 ]; c! V  p- q
3 {$ F- c$ [. Z+ q, E4 E0 a# |( a. Z7 n( C+ u  u
6 R: f1 N' C+ D: t& m5 f. v! {

1 B$ @/ n' c" L5 [講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
# b0 ~& F9 U6 f! i6 x我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

) C: G! @& D' Z5 j, f0 h" q3 \

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
7 t5 v5 P$ [: |9 x* z我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

  [$ \* s, U& x: t: B

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
2 V! P9 ~2 v2 k9 [) \5 C4 d+ @5 Y. D+ T
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
. G0 M/ @9 ]) N. \咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

" |- \% l/ k/ \- H呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ 6 x3 v$ f% O8 Q0 w; T! z/ M" T
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~0 F- N9 k4 b& ^+ J% J0 o
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~