coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
; {2 r6 T3 i! j$ c# T" }我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

, U) R+ F, z1 B3 Q1 J

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
" k6 u! @; H! w4 a- d7 H: r8 y+ L我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

: D: U3 B8 s& a) ?- t/ [' N( n
參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
1 J  `1 s  ^+ ]% ^2 h7 _: t, O
) b  T' }; I% t/ {  ]( n3 _無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~
" f5 w1 \# N% z9 g# i( [8 r3 s$ e) T$ Q8 ~9 T
請珍惜會員戶口!~
" e) @: x. r; W5 m/ }3 \8 i  S4 C* U# W  o/ n
: Y- V* N7 p- f: |+ _

: v; ^+ s' v4 E! q. S% }2 ^5 ~* ^  K$ y; o
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:. O4 H" }- k, k: R
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

% ~* M1 ~! b1 w# h7 I

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:2 r! l. U# ~& I0 j: k+ @
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 N; s3 }- v$ k9 [9 N8 ^4 {5 V

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
2 j/ C* U/ _% x- ]. y' z
9 g. r% k8 v' B5 g) i9 C$ X" h立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。/ T2 D, I; p2 ?' c" ]4 x, H8 X
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

' O. D; z* C: g$ \$ L1 _呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
9 O, g; h) g& g+ X9 j* W% u成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~( n" p: i; Y" U8 g1 R  b
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~