coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
3 w% O  l/ H# {6 z4 k) {: Q# Q我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

& Q- H/ X. F3 H& q" Q, a* A7 G

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:+ r7 g# ?& ~# s. K
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

9 O8 Q7 ^5 k2 g" M- k5 u. t* O參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~+ Z2 d' j" |. O5 H) ?

- ^) ]' P9 G6 Z" Z3 [% ^9 q/ V無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~1 e1 ^$ b/ z0 [6 ]7 U
1 |9 B: F6 v. n# h1 ~5 f
請珍惜會員戶口!~
  |; I3 I( K# q' Q( f# W" q- P7 M$ X6 ^

2 |7 t$ F; u+ K! F$ J3 C: D3 V! l8 s1 l- I. [  q
3 c. G5 f. f: v9 I# g) p
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
+ v4 c8 Q; ^2 A! J4 [我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

# s4 ~  r' L& }9 y6 M3 w

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:1 D9 I/ q6 S# @2 o5 Q$ ~
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

. M+ ~1 z( _: _+ [+ A7 p! g

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:+ `# P# O' e$ z* G

' y  `! A# y% l& ?4 l立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。! u6 @. ?/ Z8 ^0 ]
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

1 z3 _5 G! y5 U/ s( |: `$ Y0 E呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ 8 v' F' ?: e( x# h9 j. r& V( C- Z# R
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~3 K- E  m+ w# ]+ m
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~