奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:) B6 ]8 M8 v8 B! Z8 N; G

8 |$ w) s+ d7 x  ?  Zagree,' b% n( I% Y$ o  w) x# D( }. K" D
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
# {: D$ B: H& L% P. B4 `但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
$ w, a6 v0 [5 X# x0 a8 w' U期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

  e# w, x, X6 e
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html% e- }( r2 {. M! Y
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地$ R( ?' V/ M' d+ ?7 d
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.8 n1 _7 L, L: d( q8 S4 \+ [% s
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
9 ?; q* g1 ^" G有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！   J0 I9 z$ Z# a  Z5 X% ?

2 p2 [" t1 T1 H, N7 @( {# |係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???* u& i8 q0 B* B; [! M- v" ]
2 C( i) k' G& F* @5 y5 Y
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) b3 |+ z' e, `1 P; G9 H
2 ^4 Y5 `! v% F( |絕對支持啦/ t- V3 p( \8 f5 n

( ?( O9 G. z- s; K' a% L  B* q有錯就認,打就企定
( _* v0 f- s- L/ z2 n9 J  m7 D* r4 X- o) ^9 N! m
無錯當然要撐到底% |; O9 T, C0 T9 Y. S
8 v: F% }% L% \. H- x. E
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩3 ^- E" v; t8 |3 m9 }  A& Q5 r

  y) J; q: C1 \1 |/ W9 `: l在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
) c" y2 d) U' W1 d
- V# r5 x- e, Y' U一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
8 ~+ J7 p7 i) X1 o* ^# @* [* K6 @2 p
7 y, E8 r, Y2 V我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
' N6 t. g: @- h. O9 r$ \1 d2 p9 W3 l0 q6 q; u( X
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
+ N5 R! }% z6 ^/ E* o& H
0 g3 ~! v6 L, C我唔認為lor
! U: i. A8 W2 H% ]) N
, O" K( t# y2 m8 X0 y& p5 l唔係話要整死佢地
7 z3 Q1 O8 h* j9 G. M# I- G5 q
  ~5 I9 `9 S! B* j# Y* _9 `9 N6 s而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
  o+ A" m9 t( v' _" J
! N  E3 k  a" _% O' V. X! ~( T我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大+ k7 w5 T$ u* o2 ^# e" \" ^

3 E2 o+ u) E( K( e有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的* E0 p& Q/ L$ ?
2 R0 w& a1 `% c: v
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
9 p. d6 p; S0 r, |! }3 s  g! C2 _' v4 j2 C- f$ c( P7 a  z
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
- T8 q- ]7 C6 ^; V"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"+ f) F" p1 \4 E( |2 T

# a4 x& O6 l4 E1 o9 x+ ]我們的大學生
( a  `; c7 b& M3 r
! L4 d6 k% o! z) T, k
# S5 R6 O, E7 C% ?  y
: P* c9 M+ O2 V  I3 {. h, Z/ C3 s/ W0 r$ b2 u7 A

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
1 B4 Z4 {9 \/ @, Y% {" @4 K) K1 C1 a. d5 S/ }, R
/ [2 ~# S* A* |' ~
有見地 !!!$ N$ d: u+ S7 v& E$ i
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html: T( j& \5 Y, d/ ]5 u1 u

% n, Z# A0 t. d$ P% u8 r& ^' Y+ p& XI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
- l: D, h9 Y$ a6 W) }' Q: w$ _I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
# i) p" Z4 d4 u5 ]I pretty sad that about the University official.! G) [6 h( I$ k7 K3 V! y1 b
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la! O. G7 Z3 o3 ^4 \% _" O# j8 P

; O6 }8 z, O4 \! e( B[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
% [3 i3 E( X; u3 j) f  u' V% k我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ R6 K6 i# I4 {8 ]  r" O6 l
1 ]. ~' v( G2 f- Z; X" j: S' t[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

$ K( m! o/ }- {! V6 ^- c6 L) V- J" e! E* m9 y7 b& X
兩者有何分別?
! h. K& b  J; T% o( g# {中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?