奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
% Y: D* a4 B. V* a! S7 m( O
) r# o& z, c& m4 \* k2 z& iagree,
4 u. r6 n9 v1 H0 G& A9 P我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
. E, p0 V6 ^" Q9 D8 Z6 T但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
9 ]9 D. j- l: W- i( p+ }4 v期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

/ X4 q0 H+ ]; h+ y( j" _
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
; E% e3 h. e8 h/ q7 [已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地% Y$ F" s8 v5 _+ P% L1 |
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
. S; v& Y# T, h9 A( z: _7 R% S5 u3 k( WJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:& c) d' H* k2 y+ k2 E) V. e; N
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ + q  T9 L" ]' s: z
* T! ^8 H3 S+ k# U( t; g: Q8 e
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
4 H& V, i4 C" A) E* u) O2 c2 x% {" S" L8 V9 S* R0 A- F
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

4 ?! ]  q6 L  N. i  j+ W* h' @5 J8 k
絕對支持啦: ^* b' w8 J" Z' n
8 Z# O3 P% T( ], c
有錯就認,打就企定6 W- U# F1 v3 g% f& _% R1 K7 h5 X
! L- D5 [  ]( ]3 V
無錯當然要撐到底  I% Z5 b- A4 L" p4 Y& b1 H: j
0 ^3 [) X% W$ y+ Q; P1 z
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩7 \( R% t4 I! E, g/ F- `
7 N* i% w, T: x7 p9 K' v, k3 ?; u
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
/ ?- H; f5 H0 c) T$ \7 |6 f1 ?# O- H" ?6 c0 d4 l1 n
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力$ w, O& m% Z8 P4 B3 u
) E) r0 q! Q0 X7 z6 Z3 m
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生9 q) d  s3 W. P
& m8 {$ O' b6 K" n9 O
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
% {$ ?* c, Y, J* h  @2 }6 f; u
8 a$ v( a+ k9 Q8 H我唔認為lor1 I& P. X0 U$ A' I( i7 K% i

7 H& a& U- k! [0 I' S+ E唔係話要整死佢地# D' V* o; T  D! w& g$ S7 O7 g$ }

! l& R$ {: x9 w- ^7 i$ T而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用# F  R* i2 A; Z3 u% t
* e5 E! _+ D5 e" U$ p3 M
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大9 s0 v5 s" F$ [. V, ?

5 F% z% X  P1 K" Z% t3 R, C, L有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
4 G9 n& [: g# x; v+ h
/ }- f% p8 Y, Y. U唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由7 v' U+ s3 Z8 F% Z  Q" I
- u) @1 s! p7 M0 ^* q1 F
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
; Q% J1 S5 P8 Y  H% X6 g) Y"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
9 O  {) \) Q8 {5 Y/ @* `
% d+ J" O+ q& w, Y, H5 ?我們的大學生  ~; ~. B+ G+ Y3 i' H6 {6 ~

! q* {" P: N! N9 b0 D) ?
7 \1 O; t3 w7 t4 r
0 M0 M& y* i9 |) j4 P3 }* n2 b
. b/ N% ]  v) s9 `

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:. ^  b% {- t* H& c/ Q4 Y( E# x! q

( ^. N: r7 k2 L9 S: W+ j4 F
, [' H7 i/ A& g6 N% U0 r5 u有見地 !!!
1 q$ e/ Z. ?6 n! v現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
, S* q8 m3 ?! t) Y" a) o/ ?
4 O  U% d7 q. u# y0 ]( iI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. # W1 A' H# a6 g, r% V( N. T$ G
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
$ t( a$ H* M6 S, G3 O; }# oI pretty sad that about the University official.3 ^& z" Y! P3 I4 S. z+ F
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
) E+ X; W5 }" n% t1 i, m8 l% j2 J! `7 J  n+ W
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:$ I; M) S8 M/ l6 K8 q- S# B; ?  `0 b
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
! j: a7 J7 V: X/ I; ?" k8 A  u9 f3 J8 I+ Z9 \) o5 N  L
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

- B9 `1 j" S. ?& b: I5 D
$ a' }5 E! V+ t  x8 _4 [
兩者有何分別?8 t0 W+ f* |! v; P1 y& Y! e; v
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?