奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:# }1 O# k4 e1 G$ F
6 t# p0 N$ o% r; U- e7 k! R& {' |
agree,
# X2 P! h$ B1 _3 y我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,! h" b" ~- C9 ?- ?: v+ E
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,* b# a* P7 u/ ]3 P! b
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

* N' |9 d1 `5 ~( h4 \5 t
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
/ R. f2 }0 I1 }& B: o* n' Y已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, {* u( X1 {# Y# F* U搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
' A8 f9 C8 o- l$ ~Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:; p" `" z# `' `2 U
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
! [. R0 N$ N- i& X! s- h0 ^7 R  ?1 Y1 ]  V! ?
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???+ s* @9 U2 @/ f( p# v
9 }: I8 T$ a( L, _5 b. Q
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 k& f2 d9 z! l7 M5 b5 o# q# O1 F' i5 f. Q
絕對支持啦
6 S! N& f2 L; m" d: i) d2 t% j; D6 c) e- K% r
有錯就認,打就企定& H# R" v/ p  N' g  w
; T& L4 Q4 p* @0 J+ i7 U9 \8 {) Z
無錯當然要撐到底, L$ L; \& m$ S+ U3 H
1 q; I* Z" B$ J5 C
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
8 `; _! P# I4 F& E& t# o) A! v. G/ x
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得0 Q% H" ]" l* D- L9 s  e- e
6 h7 C) k) y6 f0 J; n6 a2 A" l: Y6 T5 D
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力* V5 R3 E1 H( G( g

0 `( u5 K5 J) ^我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生) Q' N; C8 X  A+ o( p# N  F' ~

, c! D" w7 _, U# u2 k6 ]; \唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?$ F5 A5 d  C& Z5 }  j8 ?. u9 L
) ?% @% Z. \% s3 n) ~3 q
我唔認為lor& T7 }- t! x* P+ Q, b4 D

+ F  p/ i5 O5 j/ Z& L$ U唔係話要整死佢地
7 D- O; M3 d, q7 j5 C  p6 F/ z# \6 g. S6 s9 g. Z: A0 j
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
4 r$ \9 d+ S7 w
* ?6 q2 O# b; V: M& q我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大1 Y: t; u/ s$ b5 I( A9 L4 s: y
0 n: K  R0 j: V2 f
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的2 C8 j7 n  U1 n2 `8 `
' V/ m( g, s+ `, }
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由1 O' u# ]3 `$ ~3 n/ {4 A
: v$ g0 h+ H, c6 a$ Q; a/ Y
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
* Q! z; o# n; t+ ^% \, N" u"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"2 L1 N& b: h9 |6 w6 s: O

: D9 }* a; O; W. _2 \8 [7 S我們的大學生* O: Y' I7 V7 Q

: j7 V& T4 C3 @+ h0 ]* k; Y7 K  p: h+ q3 ^/ V( F
( }1 P" }' k- K- f1 ~+ B* k, z
: \- K2 H+ R+ e0 l7 _& Z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:" h6 V! B5 Z( ?# e4 ?5 Q0 {
& C  V) f, e' R3 F
3 K+ _' i7 S3 r- N
有見地 !!!
$ r, Z7 K0 f5 x2 M4 W  g) |; l現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html+ M, K5 p& R. ^8 p8 I& M8 j

3 ]( r3 p2 R$ A- u1 d$ j" C/ XI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
0 G9 s. b; l, I$ w! T' ?- t* N* BI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
$ B3 }: _6 B7 Q& KI pretty sad that about the University official.
% B, A, s& Y- Y  W" c9 g- iIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la$ ]/ C1 }& d2 r) V, k" w

' `- y0 I) Z" b, k1 c5 V[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
9 c" N, b3 m! z% _, E4 g# y" r; X我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
% m+ a/ p  x( N- c
5 L% H# J9 ~" k# I& ^% h( W9 q[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

& d9 r: z7 ]. F0 B  ?8 R8 H  d# B6 s' B4 E7 V9 c
兩者有何分別?
9 N' @, t! x0 d. ?' b" s- ?8 b中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?