奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, h$ D+ x0 z( O7 U3 S: W
1 X/ n1 w8 ]; ^8 Aagree,4 l& h3 Z# ~  e8 w7 i0 t8 R
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,4 B# Q) _4 a' S- u# Q' _
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,1 c+ v* |) l" Z: S
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 P* h) |  ?/ M( H
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html# a; I( K7 c5 _& z6 A/ @; @# d
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
( I; a! G% E0 e' ^搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.# a/ \+ B: Y# k$ x
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:  A5 E# a) ?- G( f
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 3 z. @) z& I. ?. S; T. t# p( V
3 P1 V1 u" I9 K5 _7 j2 t3 P+ l
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
, S# ^- g8 I" [: V7 P  z, \- n6 e" G5 Q9 \
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 P1 j3 A. @( T0 |
9 i$ n. o; k8 [& w絕對支持啦
& E" Y- b# l- h8 }
! \+ P* i, T8 U  L5 i4 C. [有錯就認,打就企定" `( }5 G4 A8 ?( B* `) Y

5 p# q" t4 X# a* i! H5 R無錯當然要撐到底
" G& w8 c) u1 j* q; m. x* B* Z: G; T6 {& Z3 i
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩6 a. j* g# a3 {: Q
- Y+ ]8 p  N; O* N1 T9 ?
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得& J$ c, }: O3 c7 n: V

3 g9 R) n! |* z4 k/ h) r; G0 L8 Q; S* c一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 T- y  p; U* `- v
1 O, ~% r# n7 F
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
5 {3 G* Z" L% ^5 n" J# R, c, _: A% R- Y, S" p
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?, h- t7 \# T% x. j

) }4 v# \2 l; L5 |, R. h: a我唔認為lor- c3 ~" h. T( {$ U/ c
" O2 N5 e! ]# y
唔係話要整死佢地
! J2 \) \0 `7 Z4 q7 m+ |: y1 _& T! d5 ~6 U0 \
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
+ x$ y6 m( w, w7 L5 Y7 ~2 _1 \/ p% c( r8 J7 M3 @
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大. D6 N, |; Q& K7 f0 w
' ]4 h  j( j% G* g
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
% b% Y% g1 W# l# o' R0 K& R/ [
* X: C8 C" p7 Z; |5 P, B# l. S唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
& I) p2 ^* E: e6 E1 V8 X) E$ o3 H
7 R8 m6 A& b9 K+ M% g2 O7 f7 r大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
0 P# _0 D: Z5 D# ~# j& O"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"* r. D1 [- `, T1 o/ }* }

( v) T. C0 K& }! W/ H# g: t* C我們的大學生2 I/ E6 L; V+ E% U7 g8 ]4 x. F

9 N4 a9 z4 g# x
4 Y# \$ y6 s' y& {8 O" z0 {# F3 v6 l/ D& Q7 J, c. X: V' K

: M6 R5 m- s$ c% x2 r

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
  _5 r- s8 Q9 J( a; m, R) f& d+ p# f0 T+ v% T, r

7 l2 r+ w) J0 g6 d5 ]" b; {有見地 !!!+ g+ _: Q$ A/ ^  P, D
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html+ [: }5 \) h  N. ?) T

1 v! k  V& ?; v- U: BI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. " _8 t3 B8 T1 @  X
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* s6 `4 }" A$ v) g, }I pretty sad that about the University official.8 P5 Y5 g9 S; m! N$ R' s
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: p. j- D0 u& z  d& {" E8 |
2 ]  Y: F4 {5 \% b- [[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:! y! w8 Q6 r6 }) N2 ?- s4 D2 p! _0 Z/ n$ `
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la6 ~& k3 D! w% P8 d( E- @4 v" i
) L( l4 {9 ^% z) E/ x
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

% y; v# C) s8 A5 f$ L) T+ H
+ F4 i9 V& o& I
兩者有何分別?
' Z" h* A* k! l+ [* N' B% U6 N中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?