奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:% z' D0 B# _7 m" Q4 [4 h# ]/ a0 N

3 F1 P! W4 l, i7 v7 V! Bagree,
6 b8 P. {; `: g; g, v我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,. }0 L2 P+ \+ e
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,$ x* g5 O+ s' l# g
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

  A5 t% i8 t4 _& i$ nhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
8 T8 l+ V; Q4 z5 C已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
( P4 j% i1 u5 w* A% L+ ~" C8 _搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.+ g3 ?) W2 j1 {+ w2 t# ]% R
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:" ]: B% B' E, Y: c( `2 m! O1 h
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ . `% r( B( y! {0 j  k3 s! X6 O

6 [# l+ [) f9 N9 L  W# n) L7 M9 U係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???" C; i3 W( V* h& ?

/ t% u0 z2 \8 Z4 L9 }- A$ ^4 I為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 X% v2 `3 _3 f# K- d
, X  P" J8 P% G( a1 g/ Y* b
絕對支持啦
0 @$ b0 s+ X0 F) {" C  ^7 J2 _& J3 w7 {0 W  ~: }  R
有錯就認,打就企定
7 l% B3 _/ h! O2 n
" F2 P+ W& s# o% E! D無錯當然要撐到底
/ v) O  m0 v" Q& n: g: ~0 C4 [, f/ j9 s
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
3 Z2 |; A% q: Y' |, f! m0 S8 O& x2 m0 \) U* ^, A" a% N- ^  X
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得0 s; `& J+ V4 R% o3 @; b' @" ]
: m' B( O' p" K  ~
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力, [# a: B5 y6 u% K# z& V" V

! d! p0 e2 U6 B+ X我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生- p* v& \# W1 _' W
+ j1 H* ^% H9 B. {& E" Y2 K
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?3 G; c; x" m. _4 t' `; v
+ P6 r, \' u  A& N# E  `5 h$ V" P
我唔認為lor
  M8 `5 {/ d' {) ~  b2 r
- T3 `  h& O4 R, |8 p唔係話要整死佢地
, W% d( j1 `: j% c2 k5 |2 x) c: B: r
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
8 U0 |# P0 w$ ]% _+ a9 ^8 @/ X; j/ W, d; y" J3 f/ Q
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大# b2 U+ {5 f6 W  x
" G/ q, ^* T7 [2 W3 O
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
( T' O: v; k9 @+ g0 `' ~0 e  Y5 c1 j) ?. x! N$ K
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由% [) O5 z# t1 e+ k' n" U* l

( l4 C  ~4 d. J* G" X6 H大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句2 d. R3 j+ k" t
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
- u- v" V! R8 C$ u- K" I/ \/ ^6 d' a( }
我們的大學生5 p+ t7 k% ~# {2 Z! j% x
8 `, `$ Q, P4 m2 _) y2 [+ ~

: n- {' W; F, @8 ]
: r& ?/ Z% i- W2 D7 V- D
$ s8 H+ y1 x; `+ ~9 i

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
! [: J7 ~6 U9 k
4 w( ~- Y& Z  h9 L4 t& V2 ?( Z+ u* k) _4 U. x9 J
有見地 !!!: f3 b* ^8 n9 K" x- `* z
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html7 f; J/ x5 h: U/ i
# e+ T- r$ A' {
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.   i5 [9 g8 ?6 |1 t+ r, g: a
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* E0 ~! E- ~/ c& c. BI pretty sad that about the University official.
& B2 h! [4 H9 }. H" x. fIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* z3 T" m" _: ]2 q1 W0 M9 ~, B" B4 _
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
6 P* p- [' O6 d. w  g# s我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la& Y' }8 B& K2 q5 ^9 J7 y" `

. O! P$ ^6 M7 m$ a% f1 G[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

# _# @. F5 {( z" q9 E: w
( L! p* t9 e1 j/ a! o% x
兩者有何分別?
4 \/ d3 @) y& w( ~* ?# m/ N9 _3 W中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?