奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
) W! B' t5 O, f9 n8 B
7 i- }$ w% y( ?2 d5 G. p2 j1 p5 ?8 }agree,
0 Z. ^4 M8 l0 H我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
) G4 {1 @4 q; F: \但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
+ v5 J) B9 J( X' ~期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; Y& ^; R- n# F. _( _7 V
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# t1 X" I, \, H# M+ X8 G已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
) A+ m! m0 S: n4 n搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.4 |8 Q9 U$ c8 h% e5 x# c6 N1 L
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:# K6 T' h# X$ k+ E* N3 Y) `$ u" m
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
$ U8 q! K3 P. C( W) R  D
, |! Q9 {! x" o% P3 e- T+ k" _係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
: R- P5 D$ l, l, ?& Y
- C; i6 D) E9 C為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) o; x, u: A, n
: M# T% B+ S/ ~% ~2 k4 Y0 J絕對支持啦8 k/ t9 Z! N# y9 W
5 S4 Y+ h5 a, F. v5 a
有錯就認,打就企定" b! H- w7 a0 W- `1 E

& V) Q  t  [6 e( y" N- F5 B, F無錯當然要撐到底
3 |' [/ @1 |& s( ]
) W% t2 V: N2 Q$ i5 K但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩0 n) O" ]. V& b1 _

3 c% y! U; q( M: Y$ `" v# A在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得+ d& \) `& r8 E( n6 G
$ X; ?. `! S7 `: B
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力7 k' Q5 V' U; b, ~& _) v5 \
) F' j1 S! j! N: E, E; |- s( H. `& b
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
0 [- {0 c/ ^: u) h: k; A3 m: V+ a1 G+ V4 ?: |* W( }- h
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?9 g2 `, t# q  E+ g

8 {% W+ P, \: z: K! n* O我唔認為lor
; D; G! L4 T( u' W
2 F: l; m% z8 d) P' Q5 \- t6 {唔係話要整死佢地
. V  i, C0 q8 e3 @- I' W- N. A. {5 O9 _# E, h, u
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用- j6 K) Q5 K) s5 c. ~7 g, i" ]$ C
% ]( d8 T! ~6 |
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
% p; r+ H; {4 h" s* \# t5 _2 [
: W! j  l& g! c7 l) G5 a* L有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的: N# J, u9 W- u& _: O: l5 E, F

& @" i$ P# Y& B9 j唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
  ^% O. t( \9 Z& M
! Q4 ]  @4 I' S7 \$ [. i大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
- T- A8 b5 i; a% U! c"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
- q; g* _) A, V0 n$ h0 @; K: w+ W( z5 n4 {- P
我們的大學生- Z) K! [6 Z2 G+ j0 E# U$ M
/ f. V7 J" R( q1 p3 n
+ f* J9 m. j' Y" {' G2 U0 T; X
7 t- F$ z" {* f* D: x1 d& `

) q- u3 L# t5 Z1 z0 \" C1 n

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:8 H& T  k& ?8 K* F& {# [

% F3 g) |2 G4 o
+ ^1 p5 `$ z$ l2 Q/ I有見地 !!!0 D7 R! O1 e+ T* ^
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
, c5 W3 P7 i# {. D' |4 ?$ c$ x- g/ H% j' l' o' U# R
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. + z4 n( H8 `( r
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
' ~/ h( P- q+ `+ HI pretty sad that about the University official.1 n6 f8 l$ n) ?# Q) ]8 ^
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
- I" Z* C2 `; E6 ^- z" o. w& \1 h
3 g. g$ R) Q9 ^( u  y3 x[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
3 r, T8 m4 N, _" C我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la: \9 j. W) i9 D# i* g* l* T7 |& P  Q
$ j; }5 x( g. x" R( z' s8 o9 g
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

% @: ^6 d/ K9 n
5 T0 Y& l( I+ z( q% [! F兩者有何分別?
+ Z. q& Y2 O' X6 i% |# u6 z中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?