史艷文2

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
0 o) v" H. U3 p( K( i! W) p2 A) p但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:# @  @* y# U- m8 Q/ {- r  ~3 f- ]
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

4 ]* N0 ~6 E' Z1 P
I agree you points that it could be illegal
: b9 b8 _1 X4 g/ Q# g! Sbut that is still a "gray area"
; ^1 w2 Z4 \, v; c/ k5 Zwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair% J$ z" m( \2 k
8 e/ L6 l1 F  q% k" L6 a
anyway, I want to say that is/ L/ x* H5 B* U" {! V) n
who is supposed to be protected by laws8 ^" H1 Q* B# P9 P4 C* _9 h
creators?
' j  V2 d9 }4 L( |1 n, J, j1 lbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market% T/ r  J7 O4 n' P, \8 H
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.2 z& K+ c! o- P) ?
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
2 |/ u% f/ M, f! t4 b) WWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
- {. z: U- ~; |# m# i其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

- S6 w! q1 n$ }# k6 T+ Q0 l+ H
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:( Q( o( r) M; Y- }

  q- c' c! Z3 [2 R. Z7 p; K! I- }我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

1 i. {  k- \' `: x* O唔係喎!
5 @8 N! r! g8 b' b4 A& }# @古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& u( q$ ~' t8 r* l, h- b2 g: g# d我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
! w# Q- U6 m& W: I3 {! Q4 |8 s佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!" [0 T/ K) s. G2 I# C  \
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234

希望佢無事
' x) V7 h- ]4 d3 F- P一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!) n' F- p- m# n% h5 N( t7 \
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
2 v' b. q, \0 D4 \" j3 Qif so bad, dun download la, right?
* M, i9 L5 S+ l, H2 t  g: B2 T: Ki am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
! E  ?" I4 k9 M% cbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
0 q1 Y# y' M; f! L/ ^8 I& B1 p. Nno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
4 T$ ?1 Q1 \" p) V7 z2 K9 ~so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 j. _- Q& F/ q3 y
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
5 H6 j  r& J( G/ c& {# K# I) iwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
; B+ {8 F- l, t" \' Z6 G0 |so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman

罰款,冇留案底!
0 s! Z6 h, z' q! Q3 R4 b- }佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
" w+ d: T4 L) V( P$ }: t, N政府想比下馬威0的人~~
" r  t1 z& P- E# h) P, I錢就一定罰
3 C/ E2 E  G+ q8 s0 a) d1 {- e未必要坐牢~~

HansChan

如果真係判佢有罪,9 N) F3 r  @! E9 A9 M; i; s
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
% g  P( N, w" p4 b' w佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  N6 R4 z* J, I! B
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@

冇事!!!!!:cool: