奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
8 r2 `8 x2 ~2 Y/ y9 Y/ c' q
9 g5 s; J9 z; n. w, V1 ]agree,
3 V. L. o4 r* w& H5 Q我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
7 b1 Y9 C: ?. M2 e- a& d( F! i: F+ b% B但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,  A2 N  y7 o; z2 O
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& B# E5 n* u3 I# l4 j/ n; b
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html3 ]# o1 ]6 m" ~& `, j. _' o% H
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地0 J1 X' i5 n) }
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.' T: U! W! e' Z4 I
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
+ i! x- m% Y  e, j有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
% l" f/ U0 @1 u; G3 B, q! N: r. N) T* V, p
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
  g; D. I' v- Z  H/ M: Z, s3 G) A3 R8 V& s/ S0 r- y, D. w  L; h
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. j1 X# v3 o$ w% p7 e
) F: |$ n8 w. ]: S
絕對支持啦
1 x4 ]! O! j5 a7 S  g6 u; Y4 D( v2 h
有錯就認,打就企定
& d# [+ v! Q" T, X6 I: y' ^' |/ K( J. I- ~3 I5 m' k# x- {/ D
無錯當然要撐到底5 `0 c0 d, p% q- e# {/ ~$ {# F
  ?( C& J! Y$ F* x
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩9 v. b1 s$ F/ |; L, f4 M
- F) J5 }$ C( ?+ `2 h
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得2 j0 v& p" D! P. _! u; [! n0 z! U

6 _# X' M8 T9 ?$ j一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
! Q$ M$ R: Z& k5 S1 o3 m9 m$ @/ B. b: o7 P% c- o
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生) n# p( p1 o. c' B7 |+ ?; d
' L" ?2 T1 j+ b' Q. o, B5 B
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?2 h4 @9 i! d/ Y4 l& e

( z- _$ p, ]& j! Z& [9 \' ~我唔認為lor
4 O8 s9 g# y/ N& F
6 r9 f" L2 D* o1 {0 Z$ L5 r5 n+ ?5 u, a+ m唔係話要整死佢地
" ]' y# _& C; T/ D- n* X- [$ R
0 }% W1 d; B8 {7 N% K. @1 C' k而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
" Q4 C3 X/ A% Q2 x# k! C' s
' N! {# T  T6 m) y3 G我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
. g/ A/ F8 l. n  s1 q$ A# W7 e
) K# K; `5 w0 k( U- H有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
0 Y2 R- Q6 Z# v5 L$ N# M- x4 ]  l& ]  N$ g" V' V" X0 i, m% G
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
2 s! S# Z, L9 V1 o8 b
* N! ?$ g, d" \# N5 a: z大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
, N, h6 Z; n1 w* j. l% K"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"/ r6 c! n/ T9 g3 G- p; c

" c$ P9 i5 d: z& M3 M/ ?* k我們的大學生
/ C1 N7 _0 [0 n4 _- m3 r9 K7 R

( I1 V# ^' f8 u
% M  E1 C4 L: J
: {, a3 u+ z4 C: H( U. D

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
+ {. S4 S1 N: K2 g! A
( }3 y, G1 k, B) x; ]! N, y3 m
# M7 P9 V2 p2 E有見地 !!!
/ ]+ K9 J, T% Q0 C1 j8 `  e現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html( Q& i8 I6 |6 R% E
( }2 P/ D: V& q! h% g/ J4 R
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. $ n$ `5 b5 T+ H% F3 R) L
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
( ^6 x% H* ~4 t$ n0 |, J. L- L* FI pretty sad that about the University official.
3 ~3 J% u0 W/ g+ wIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* U# W) T: d( N% H2 n5 G

. p3 O+ x# K. o+ n* Y[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
8 h  G+ }: `2 |) |% @我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
& A9 n9 V7 c/ T1 G' r, m( n$ M  z- p
2 c; u+ Y2 v0 q0 h: E& n[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

. k# M" E7 y4 f3 E7 J) @5 ~
* d2 g) ^; P5 F) r/ \兩者有何分別?
, J8 B, K! X9 [) ], H中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?