Rika

由最好排到最壞3 g& r  F  i8 C
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
5 Q/ I. X( f5 Y8 xB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount- U3 j  k( w: @5 J0 L
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her2 `$ `2 _9 U) B% p, g% y& _
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
& b1 }# H: g- P& D$ w1 g/ Z+ R$ R$ `( [L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
/ v2 ?$ u# s5 A! c  T7 W/ ^8 ~; k. T
( E) q; Q/ V' w) @2 i, LM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
) s/ G1 n, c- m0 o0 D9 C. w3 D9 D* Y
+ ~5 ~, p; o! |; NS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
( M- s7 h' Y9 J* _     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!7 H4 ]8 {; \: V7 Z0 m

0 I( F6 M2 w: j: kB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
3 @( l3 p& y" x% J8 J9 E$ j! O
6 o! Y! B2 @& f& ]( cL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志1 W9 E/ H. d$ R
7 g8 u: e7 m, U1 g& N9 w8 F3 I5 _
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
2 ]0 M) }  W! c) {, W7 @: r+ R     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好) {8 n' k. s9 ]4 q8 y
; N: m2 W* s% I. t- R* B
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案' S+ j7 J, J) A5 p# f' a0 |4 |
而家答多次
/ U3 [9 r: t& W$ H+ \f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
# ^; i; j9 o4 E$ T. z" El: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
- }( ]# T% q" t+ G9 V8 G3 X0 vb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢8 ]8 F  f' c  E% c( ]3 G
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
: z5 m8 k& _8 U5 ?' ~m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S7 n- X$ c9 n6 v% M% v: v

! S; Q% F/ S, {L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
, ], G1 {3 b! t9 n% DF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度: |6 a3 |% E5 ]7 a! f+ E( e
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
3 P5 L6 n2 m- D( X' A1 }2 E3 QS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
5 E# t! h# H$ A  z; ]! VB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞& P& P3 ]# _/ H- N+ Z
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"' k9 b/ r* J7 w0 |& M, e4 [; X) ~
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% G, D% t/ E% D2 _1 Z" i, w, qM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法9 [( j& t% u0 l8 {$ x' o  [0 k
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
9 J+ b0 ^1 x3 h' T& P9 R3 X% [B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情" E5 p" S9 P! A
/ z( _9 P9 Y0 L3 G
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
+ c/ _& Y; X/ d1 R6 Z( X6 KL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
9 D+ z, p  f8 X$ j# qB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘4 y) E6 ?8 _% m0 d% ?
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件4 e5 `% W% v, d! j# l7 e' [, r
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方" s2 V- [$ }5 ^3 \7 p
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 x# `3 R# ^5 ~
& |" {0 a. P* t) r: F5 Z
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
0 k8 N4 ?# W6 z' D. g; L& e" U8 |5 c7 M0 U4 b6 H' Z
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  - A( D( P0 y. D) O3 H/ k8 r5 Z% v

- F- p1 H' O7 uS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )! q, L- K- N( J+ S) O
. j+ H' @9 m; }- I/ a" j
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
2 m1 n. P& g0 E1 @+ C3 ]$ b
2 ~( z' K& Y8 J' yM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
8 x# ], l5 b, a& V0 q* }4 ?
3 q* H( X$ M3 a% L7 @' l[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
. q) C( Y% z& D) b; vM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢8 l4 o/ R3 u5 e/ X' G( j. G, Y8 I. w2 l
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; d* Z7 ]" l$ X% _& y/ x) ]$ I; U
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
: H; s: N: i! T$ k
" t' }! c! e! ^6 y2 l# x7 N" s最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....& n, h' ~7 n( r& W8 @7 _7 J
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，$ v, `, o2 K7 U* \3 i
由最好開始排起既話，5 f: V0 B" p& W% E) n' J6 x
L B M F S 啦，8 ~) Q! S( O' z4 e4 \9 Y8 L

# g2 M( l9 y9 z8 J% @其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" i9 G6 b3 E5 ~
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？" H+ @, `4 ?0 B  j$ A/ C$ D
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？4 ]  ?7 C  R3 c; B% U
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ f' l1 O$ t$ Z. _% ^" \8 A( S
0 m) y+ w- V# r/ c* ^( H! r
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
/ j- W2 E$ k! D9 b9 R! C所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，0 C; ?5 Z5 E- |6 o
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" M* x! b7 u4 q/ v$ J- S; t! j

: J" ]  w) z8 }' ~4 K3 O而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
4 R7 e$ z0 \2 r4 m$ s M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，) y8 I  b% d; M. H
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，+ @( ~) y5 \9 n6 v6 W% \: k7 |
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
, g/ t# @$ d# Q M 都可算壞了。6 W' P/ q* K, p& q
5 Y' d& h4 g+ C9 C; E9 G: O
F 呢個人仲掂，
3 j( W1 y. Q$ l! r+ A知道既唔等於要講，- X2 V* w" {6 e" a+ U
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，/ R" p' ~- C4 q: H; |& u
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。* g% f2 }: R0 ?

7 s6 i+ V- F+ V) F" G! f/ f最衰個個緊係 S 啦，# j- A, Y* Z& {* d' {$ a, E
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
6 T' ^# _' L3 Y6 V4 v/ L+ X, ?
% U7 ]& S4 M1 d& D' M' C! J4 ]1 s0 g, y8 {0 k
9 f! ^( |5 x: K; w
題外話：
0 ^8 I2 c# m5 g7 p. ~/ T唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
0 J* @2 i# u  ]0 B8 w0 ?7 h! c睇到 S 呢條友，
' C9 h# i" f* N2 C& f: U2 D我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
2 U! ^, G. h* P" `( x6 I  P/ [/ e) @$ X6 z& [' @
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!" e( E  N" ?1 ^' T: b
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係, _  z$ M' h" G
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
) J- X1 H" _- W8 {B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害, A- |0 P9 X0 T/ {$ }6 B
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...