Rika

由最好排到最壞
- `& W8 U1 S0 u% h- ?; XF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 E1 K( K% v& Z0 x) u+ ]* wB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
# P6 U/ s* ?+ V/ C1 T' KS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
4 z# h& y) U% m1 S' n# vM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( h# o8 H( b" n; F9 q
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
! O* y6 C) \# ?; Z8 i
$ s, K# A; v# J4 v! `1 a8 i3 AM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人( |1 `2 A/ n' O$ a7 N4 r) ^

4 f7 c4 D* H3 l: J  _  f: R$ W' lS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
; M6 C' }) c) [4 t. _1 A3 P     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!. V4 j- n3 J( n7 J

; a0 g7 @! `4 E3 dB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做& I1 [# X4 Z/ @. w% b& D

8 r4 X1 R" e3 x; xL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
- j/ Q4 P4 S  |- Y4 J2 {, ^! {- ^
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,+ G1 T$ [0 a" S, C: y
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好! c7 ~, R  Y: f
: G/ J. {' T/ \. D2 o
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案! \/ m* i0 L3 e; R6 m& {* r/ L
而家答多次
1 J, o% o; j" rf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽. B3 N$ Y6 S6 x$ u" U
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架' q4 @1 Z3 d( U: Y% B
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
7 r/ J( l8 b+ _3 xs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.3 N/ y2 ]: o4 P) F5 |% ~
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
; L4 s! N7 {0 i
" P  J  T* g9 ]1 O# g3 y' s- L' fL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
% e4 ]4 H% `+ R! g7 [" T2 ?; BF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
: v3 u1 X% q* `1 eM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
! F: I; _0 N) h. a  oS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
. `' ]7 L* ]$ }: F% P+ W1 o& y3 |B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
! a# h0 [* i$ S: L8 TF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"9 H% }  ]. s( y' [; E7 U
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
0 r6 ~! L9 |" Z8 N: ^; l, N# kM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
" ^# D) h# D! Z: r8 K4 fL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
$ R" }, h0 j1 ]2 NB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情; w# X) R  d( ^2 f. u, e

2 p- L: s) o, Z, q世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
2 }3 H* g+ L2 I% q+ hL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
3 j& c& r+ v% {B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
2 F" I9 e! c0 I% M6 _! p% F3 J4 bS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: c  y  B; x5 \: J, g( j  }3 HF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; {  M  n, v/ ?0 q2 r
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

( P3 z! u& O, G( o1 u+ ~. S3 T5 ~7 S  Y- P. Z# s
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
. O/ }4 s5 _- W; t! ]& F( ?8 E  z" G. W  x* z1 Q8 @/ H
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
, F" ^* ]9 ~5 J' s0 F, u- r& ~* x7 [8 v! v
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
4 G" D  z; o& E. v3 J  m; N. K+ o& r) X% ]" U
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 8 L6 b3 n' w+ U; |+ ^
$ d. \( ?0 J8 d5 w# S# E) o, P
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
/ j# a8 v6 t# q) X- m9 q+ T: {$ u
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge& K% j0 Y; [  I8 r  K
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢* a" d5 |! C* s& S' \, z
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點% P7 d7 h, b; \+ S& ^
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: m( r+ Y( P. Q" o& y

+ u8 v3 i! M" x4 B最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....3 u3 U8 d2 k. x
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
" d7 C9 k6 k0 t  Q由最好開始排起既話，7 R$ `- ], K! A. H; k- U& ^
L B M F S 啦，
; j0 y3 q; ]0 A, s& d% `% V0 [& z$ A1 P8 W
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
: }* v! c* y6 U7 I: R) B但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？  J& A: e% X# G+ S- C" }5 \1 @
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？" G( U) m: K3 O
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
" R! a2 a7 z% b8 K1 q2 j! s6 V. j( j' f4 C7 t0 q$ b
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，; Y2 c7 ^5 t* `
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，0 Z! I+ z+ u6 K3 q) B
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
1 N/ [3 b4 g, X+ F0 S
4 w9 C3 _- [5 `/ w+ |, O- S- Q而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，* Q2 n$ g% _$ @8 d5 f5 d' y
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，9 s# x# g) y% n2 d! l* T
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
6 ~4 p6 {# b3 N* w+ @知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
9 F3 S- l- v; g) J* U7 f M 都可算壞了。) x0 l6 B7 D6 i7 o0 Y
1 f# j+ g) x% g  v% a
F 呢個人仲掂，% C8 h7 Y" I2 k/ [2 a
知道既唔等於要講，" D' b9 p: i$ j+ u7 L) x
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，; B- d* n6 m" W/ V4 s- I" v% t
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
1 s- E  r2 N: A1 F3 U& o& B
6 I0 {- m+ y9 P8 j, m最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
2 _5 ?: l) H, k) [& G% a始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。. M% d4 j2 [5 |  k, ]* E5 o3 U7 U
% R2 B  X( K: N. R4 ^. H- g

3 E7 d# ~% j7 y) x4 c' _* y/ P( ], P) c; ]
題外話：8 r( x7 y* {) `% q* j6 l5 i( w
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，: n* S; ]% z/ R( k, M& Z
睇到 S 呢條友，, S$ {+ N7 K& N4 V! b, v" i, L
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
; U/ q; _$ }6 [* F2 `3 q7 _
- Y& F  l/ w$ X& e6 e3 QS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!" U0 f  G6 R. n: ~& X: S5 y% I
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係8 G' u8 `3 j+ ?9 {# ?6 e* P
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她* l: U' j6 H5 G& U
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害+ {  w! ~& m3 a
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...