Rika

由最好排到最壞$ q  v! H7 k2 m: ]+ s
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
3 e( a2 G! J. U9 B% lB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount8 |( Q* [. C8 c  ]9 `
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her* J# T# Z- B2 J9 w3 d2 `/ A4 ~
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
# {0 p7 O! ^# U2 K4 QL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
! g: M, \- T, e& ?3 Y1 Y/ n( X8 b5 u/ p, `% c- b5 L$ K1 F) b9 U
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
6 S$ g" S# N4 M' s$ f: M  V; |
; `+ W, i, E5 G% `' vS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)% V# J% m& d  C. k. q) ]& E
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!' v$ F2 {+ l/ T2 ~8 ~) t" ~
, {* o2 K+ E6 [
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
8 k/ l  v& q, F3 h4 r. b% |, h( r5 v3 a# S1 d+ c' U
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
6 E0 h$ ~; `# i$ L
1 }7 a2 F" Q' V( Q$ m9 kF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,) _+ |) L, J* H; w4 E  ?
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好) z1 n6 Z; j1 h" b3 s/ V
+ N; {0 a3 T, [* K! P0 e
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
1 r2 Y5 I$ s$ d+ C' p而家答多次8 A1 N6 P6 h5 S1 G. K- s
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
' i& O: F3 L- _/ n4 s  i6 Ql: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
0 v' n7 `( Z3 Db: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢3 N* o  g8 p- w, O9 [1 F$ W
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.% `' B: D/ H% Q5 \) U
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* T- A2 K2 L1 T

- ~+ M$ x5 V) x/ ^) @( wL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大3 _) l1 z" a: [* |2 Q) A
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度/ D  \' V# [3 ?1 `
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' E' r/ _8 x& x) L) r1 T; j
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
7 u6 }0 x0 E+ q6 KB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞& Y$ F3 _3 R9 D
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"+ d" }/ s. D$ Y( P5 }
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取% b% Q+ \2 V+ ~4 ~& J/ [  v
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
4 {( S6 S& d- S  U" L6 _+ j! JL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
" ?" I0 B. x& d/ BB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情4 ^  f2 o3 }7 P1 i
1 U0 U/ ^: F/ G1 s9 O- _
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:$ Z6 c0 a% w/ B2 X
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
3 C4 Z$ }  M' f7 j9 \B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘$ }8 p/ Q* _0 ?: o4 L
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件( u# P7 S( f/ r" i
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方4 T; U) ^4 x+ Z* \1 p
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

) ?) C$ }+ \% E; ?5 n' r
7 U. N0 O# F  g# E
same choices with u , but want to add some comments ( W+ H0 w- a9 ?2 ?

9 `0 _% B& B% |8 W, MB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  " K  X# ?+ c# |7 s$ }/ M
* |1 m3 C: U# E# p1 T1 X
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )( w- D0 U( u! p1 [' I* u
/ }) |- V$ V5 O, [7 Z# A+ @
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
" f5 G, T, [0 |1 U8 g" v9 u: v0 A8 m$ I' k' S
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
8 @$ v6 u: P" l6 D4 I1 C
% n* D2 X( d3 W6 M4 `3 ^# t[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
2 P6 d# m: h+ x4 r& l: G1 c9 VM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢/ H; Z" C0 e4 i9 F7 D  J" N
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
+ e$ w6 p$ w( s. ~: `2 z/ MF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
+ i% V, R& M* o8 w; }/ l- O0 ~; _% q% _, v4 v
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....; Q: Y1 v, M/ g5 H6 Z% f) z/ @
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，! z& e. B/ i) }* b, S) w/ [9 k
由最好開始排起既話，# Z% H& R8 V; J2 j
L B M F S 啦，) B( E5 c( h+ r" q1 N4 O
0 z- o( e7 N) ~- p) P% B* N3 e. P
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，. ]3 B# k- ^* U7 C( N8 D# ]: [
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？  N' Y5 q, p* ?+ b% D
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？& s4 b3 f+ u  S( F- n+ ?& B
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。! q* W# {+ P& B) f% \

* H* W5 `2 ]8 ^4 ]而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，6 {7 ~, H; P& {7 L: j$ f" B
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
1 ]# D( t* ]& G( C明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
/ }3 Y8 A+ P" z& v
% Z; T3 \; _! B' g而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，+ j5 H* D8 M$ Z9 Z6 n9 X
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
. v# w8 q2 `; P0 E* I亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
0 F% w* [$ a' `# U8 U知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
" P8 E6 Q3 `$ Z8 p4 w$ {" e M 都可算壞了。
* x6 G5 B6 [  e( I2 G- b2 i# G4 D: m9 w) o) n; [
F 呢個人仲掂，
6 f# v' I+ n- P- u4 A+ g' v知道既唔等於要講，
" d2 R" I+ ?/ k( [! T7 @如果呢件事發生係自己身上，* B! V, x8 A( ?) y& @# o$ c
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
9 G( u$ ^6 Y& F  S; P0 V/ Y' S# Y# }  h& h* t- l
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，" X! N8 K3 a+ m$ x8 o! T( N
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。; U  |: K/ n0 n+ y$ U( O4 I. ?3 X1 i+ j
" x; o% ~( x3 y- d2 F& L

4 h, c) d9 ]& Y2 E6 c4 j0 W& F0 z# j! k  h5 J2 J3 |( e. P% D
題外話：
4 @2 v& J% V; W- _7 f  \$ R# {( ]唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
/ Y+ o# `& b3 ^- D5 Q# E睇到 S 呢條友，' l4 u. {4 p0 g" |" Z& @
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
4 g8 o" B$ I- y- X# e
0 ]5 s1 b4 j" BS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
2 B9 y( Z: _: f. b5 `* FF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
7 T0 D: |* K3 B, tM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她* O; N/ w& ~" H* q! Y' F+ p
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害( O  W( s( v( Y3 V( I9 h& i
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...