奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, S4 T% o5 `. R" z2 M8 y& `, u9 U5 D. z! q
agree,
! \. Q5 A) \# N& A! y! y我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主," L8 c' |: y* y2 `6 x! ~! b
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,/ ]) B- P  p' p1 E
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

) r4 Q: F/ b. b* u6 [* j8 @; Uhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html8 a! E2 E+ ]8 u. v$ t6 j4 @
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
  x. H. W7 ^6 E搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.2 M" K: @2 x+ A1 i0 M$ d
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
3 T6 F& \# s) b: o# `% U: y, ^有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ * F- ]4 ]& f8 i* a: l) _, E& a
7 o& X. a, W& b- f) r" W1 Y
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???$ x) e6 o: _7 s3 w" {, v: k

/ L3 k  j8 E" n5 Q* A# ^為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ Z" ?" W; E0 j+ L
# R5 T* s% A# P6 s; j+ v$ ]2 }絕對支持啦
6 Y/ Y4 Q  `1 _' a2 C6 ?; }1 B$ g! G
有錯就認,打就企定9 f& u* R1 n9 @

7 \7 j3 ~2 T* s2 M6 w6 N6 o/ e4 u8 T: L無錯當然要撐到底
  _6 h" ?3 u9 C! s) i$ [! n! K3 y: n0 f
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩( j  H( V, d9 e: q1 K+ K3 I
8 |& y4 R7 U# u8 I
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
' `" x3 R! o. }  S3 E. o
0 g8 M+ D( m- [& d: F! V2 N4 j) L一份公眾讀物係好有影響力: ?7 k( I) |  r' ^$ ]! O0 J
1 j/ D* ?4 B: }! t$ B# z+ H
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
3 e: _& F& I3 ]. s0 R9 c# f& G
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?; L8 G. {7 d. R8 d& k) a
, a) R8 S. g! e7 D
我唔認為lor
+ s: w. ~/ u: Z2 t  M+ ^* A+ L
1 b* t, Q3 B' {唔係話要整死佢地
4 i; v8 z1 [9 h1 ~5 j; |/ @0 ]
, x/ g6 u/ ]# ]+ P/ K+ Y9 F, @而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用' c, I% L: V' K4 U  b$ k( s
$ W; a3 w; J" f; n! ~, [
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大& ]5 d- j" f4 F, Z' N# [: x

# r( V) O, b7 p) D2 D) c  W有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
3 t1 r+ X7 e1 Y. U/ Q2 M
' ~- x( e1 i0 B6 l* h唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由7 E+ C- Y" W1 i$ c; U) u3 H+ ^

- R; X! s3 C$ v' X4 W* C6 Y) b大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句7 f8 Q  _& y/ `) L( N% d
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
6 t; x4 O* A5 B' Y, i% a' N9 _8 Q( l. n  D9 z$ f* `" b
我們的大學生& w9 ~+ x' u6 P9 ~. T; n
- X, {/ U) t2 r! u6 ?* v2 \

* ~. |1 `. n* `, W# F" Z, k1 |, D
' E5 T& {# U- h+ m

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
( b$ H# A/ F' E$ D6 c" ^+ ^! j8 q" Q2 C8 m* ]$ x  f
5 l/ m1 ~( X2 |
有見地 !!!6 s/ d) n# e' `+ }# C
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
8 @" [) I8 g0 H$ X7 x8 W
) M( F4 M+ e3 z% @I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
# j* ~" `8 a1 h% C' c7 Z6 ZI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 4 E. _; B& y$ p. k
I pretty sad that about the University official.( V  G, B0 {- t+ H& B: ]' h4 F
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la- |/ `2 U- h; R
6 ]% ?! v+ c. {1 {4 l, I6 ~
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
3 \% [( G7 |* T! R$ x$ x7 H/ p我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
. ~8 j( E/ K+ h1 {
& A. J" L) |; t5 F1 G/ X& c[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 w. y$ k5 w8 s7 Q5 _# X- u
; m, k0 Q0 @" K: P3 O$ ?
兩者有何分別?
/ X+ v  P: |5 A# R0 ]中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?