奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:: u' h3 m8 |! Y

- J- G4 V1 B4 _8 M( `agree,
0 y8 J4 b/ o$ ~( Q5 m- c我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
  O; j% T8 _1 h, H但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
  v5 x5 o, P% U5 Y+ f期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& M- K! D- \5 b7 N8 F9 F
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
( b- f/ M( K- r9 \2 T$ h, ?已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地* T& V# ?% w3 R/ _- \/ ?1 A% x
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
# {% ~1 G- _3 l- m& V4 ~Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
! }5 @- f* T  M3 F3 N" b有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 6 V6 b/ z2 C. f1 l, h
8 R$ u+ \& p9 U7 E0 M8 L
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???6 D: Q* W& i! H) I; Q' q
4 o- ^0 v5 ^/ U% C( h+ ^
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

" U$ b( d5 n/ g- v; D/ b9 l
% U7 ^7 D8 J* y" |
絕對支持啦
9 X+ k" O; r) y8 z9 V
& f/ `7 ^8 |# T5 \$ f$ K+ n! X有錯就認,打就企定
: b( k, y' [4 G: K$ ~
$ J8 i% n' O0 A# ^無錯當然要撐到底  b/ S9 z. @/ a

) A) g* p+ X9 L9 k. g3 C- a9 v但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
/ H4 f: _5 g+ O8 R2 G5 ?* `  H9 [; S: O, R
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得; l7 p" z# J  T" [' t9 x/ u; F
0 t( ^" k2 W% b- V2 P+ j
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力5 V' W+ I9 ?- S, |( T4 t
( c  j9 J/ k( ?/ q% |
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
  x0 I  J6 m* W7 M. `+ v
+ D! x, Q/ G; H* ^唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
( @5 |2 s$ v' I) p+ Q' e* d# ^$ f( q' g: n
我唔認為lor. U5 a- c0 W+ v( E: i& z& s
3 F2 w! C6 P9 ~  d: j9 l( U
唔係話要整死佢地4 w: _- m0 C& o) m/ g, z

2 m( S' K7 o# @# b6 Z而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
1 `0 C  B2 f3 Z  D" W0 T0 a' h* j5 U5 a1 i
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
5 ?" ^5 F4 a* P3 g
5 u' {! I6 w$ k( q; P. Z有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的" o# E4 G( S: G9 Q
8 h& B/ D' c9 ?! e$ j- L
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由# m2 y; J5 a5 l: E+ C3 s; z

" t9 J+ Y3 z: M, z& o! Q大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
' E6 a/ c8 L( u% _( Q) x"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"% V1 {/ G3 K: j. g* |1 T7 |2 }

* A, z# ^% b# d3 }" _: o3 g1 x我們的大學生7 Q, @9 C# K0 k  ]

9 P# |# y1 H: E
4 l0 i! H+ [% a" |" m; s  j; H& H+ _$ _8 ]9 O4 K$ A1 }1 m

1 u  v, @+ Q! }8 G8 S

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
6 W0 i+ f/ w; z+ m
# W3 z1 @* c4 s. @& B
% R5 H* n, Q' u9 z3 f" i, V, n有見地 !!!
: f$ @% Y, F1 L& I9 r1 \現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html& J# R: E: B; J) q
/ q+ r, b0 k  b) x+ x' Q
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
" B- R4 F: U$ e, r+ T# TI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
( v" @5 q* P5 j  wI pretty sad that about the University official.
; Y4 A" ~1 k' n& {It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
& d$ [5 p/ A% B9 y5 m% z6 A: L
) E$ C$ O! ^  s- x: y$ P[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:+ N1 e5 I/ I% D& O
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la8 h; O  B* X' ]9 W! s7 x9 ~

6 \3 x* e3 \3 b  E; n[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

- _* A; j7 u) g9 A2 p0 ~3 _7 G* o
6 L2 g9 V7 y) p" P/ [( H兩者有何分別?+ K* C% [2 a* b& |7 E
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?