|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
* e7 Y8 Q# v" t8 Q4 W, t4 C9 z: Q; M& H+ J0 F9 W7 X2 `' U0 N
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
2 C) B+ o' b7 d( @4 Q1 L0 i5 p( l" q F
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,& u6 t; x2 |0 E, q4 |
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.) g* K* H" Z6 b4 W+ A4 ~! O
; y E W6 n; uso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險& ^, A/ s, R$ _4 t# P" {5 {# I6 S
5 r; l& m) H, @% e4 m3 ~7 g
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
% r/ c- t/ E8 H. u9 z( U1 \at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|