奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:! \% d6 @$ B2 O+ l

, l, j3 r0 l8 l* Kagree,& k/ h$ x. u! T) H: o- b" {
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
3 j4 a& B6 V, @; |( I6 y( Y但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
+ J( U8 P9 X4 E, Y8 U5 d8 |期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

$ R. `. Z/ y9 i" c  l4 Z; [http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
; r( V2 x1 H: R- H# n! S9 c已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地7 H. o7 S" v+ x# G0 i9 X0 D3 o
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.4 C1 f* M' u. \$ c
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
7 _% ~8 j# C, b# h有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
+ W: J2 r' Z! a3 N( @; M% u
2 m, t5 X) B2 B! T8 q+ y  r係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???7 [& n" x/ A" p/ G4 N

3 g4 ]8 ?" ~: S$ _/ [為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

: Z. e1 o- d% @. l, s, c
2 \, v1 d7 {( j2 d" G5 ]
絕對支持啦% G" {$ v7 _! _  T% Y+ K$ ~
1 q. v2 p: M+ P. T$ O1 g2 _
有錯就認,打就企定8 r  p8 l# e. C' `( X3 C
( ], T0 p# k6 I
無錯當然要撐到底
: v/ k% e/ F5 E( b0 e' S% G+ \$ A$ I- O: X' m
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩" a" |' \0 f6 j! G" b. v- Z
0 ~7 I. t  D2 ^2 }
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
/ L9 M0 g$ v* I$ O
( g  B. Y6 W: T: J' r一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
& [7 j( V6 L1 h5 R  S8 \
6 `1 d$ j5 t. e1 h+ X" `我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
& ^: P% ]  }1 s7 r2 ?; o# @4 @& [4 S; ?- |/ V
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
+ k; f0 y) D4 b- c3 o$ d
- c; L& E( w# x7 L  B我唔認為lor- J- {- j* Z) l# v
; u- D. D& r2 e7 Z  X
唔係話要整死佢地7 z5 W" Q, n% s2 d& E( L- h! D

: W/ p0 D  r6 M而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用) q- l& _: `" {

/ C! r" N; c$ f6 U我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
7 d* a2 M/ L# @% Y+ i0 R" b
3 w, m- V1 I9 l7 D( S有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
! b$ C. w+ K& c  Y- S4 k! P" [3 h/ s2 a' f
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
1 j* J. D- x* {6 y( }6 Z" B1 y! v& Z6 E- T
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句  A: w; X) t+ `: W, p
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"( v' w' Q2 x: F& x" {1 e" E

! g, b4 F9 m: \( v& x我們的大學生
( ]( o/ x# @: X  z
$ l/ u' d5 H' T# i# {
6 [1 N+ s: `+ M  ^( w
: L; x" x# }; C' A
0 }4 z  ?: c7 y& z" }" d/ G9 ^+ q

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:# l; b! M# Y) ~+ o
* h3 |2 g$ |, p/ d! K$ O6 ^/ g
) ^* R3 N9 q/ v* z
有見地 !!!7 ^/ f4 o; |+ T2 c  V
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
; M' O$ Q1 i; ~3 l; t
, h$ P* w. C/ t( k; `I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
7 ^, i# `7 W/ j/ n2 s3 H& QI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 3 L1 C' H$ y" a3 ?& Q( Y
I pretty sad that about the University official.4 W- x  S5 y% J/ c
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 y7 z  y* d) o: U: p( T9 x4 h, f. Z& t( i
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:0 y/ t% I; i7 a& ?$ s  }. R
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* z; r" y3 r6 j6 S' f0 ]2 p

+ `$ ^; x" B* P; q5 Y+ |[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

6 \9 O# V; u$ k; U" k6 f' E7 {( x7 P0 v
  v2 y* J$ c+ _/ U( L
兩者有何分別?: _- M# m& i+ @0 i. a
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?