奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:# G7 K$ g0 x7 s* H: v5 B( O

3 o: ^  E5 `# D/ j! oagree,% z: z& |- e. R' Q
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,( X! W0 l4 R6 Z: r
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,% |5 ?$ D' m' t6 p+ f1 L
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

- k+ b  n8 B. b7 c, a
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
" D8 K0 a9 Q) I已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, M3 P9 B! f5 ]2 P+ p搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.( Q3 K; o5 m; V/ Y# I
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:( _: k' K, T& `  {' r! v% ]0 V, C
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 9 ^5 @/ O; d6 u* Y/ Z
% Z' h/ I' A4 y2 c4 j/ C/ S# _0 N& X
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???* i, L; S& V9 k- m& ]
7 A# y& k: T7 l+ P9 a8 |9 Z
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

3 ?) X, _: Y) T3 Z$ ]( G: w
, z' l% J* n  h$ o) J2 z
絕對支持啦% t' W" L) Y1 h  p! {3 T; }9 M! L
+ x/ n" Z+ G; l9 p0 i
有錯就認,打就企定
- x- P$ X/ l; [( W2 b
( v; K6 X% Q7 S' f無錯當然要撐到底
6 r% [- d1 z! }5 m- U, i. y! k" W. ~
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
' M8 Q- J, K0 X! l. T( l4 R' ]$ o: C! s& x# J4 Z' x( A2 [
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得8 H$ [( h3 p  R8 K& s6 W$ C3 d# J6 f

8 I8 Q5 X. ~$ O% X一份公眾讀物係好有影響力2 ^  J% Z/ U1 D  f* M$ v
0 @( u% \* ?8 y
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
3 M" m$ y0 t/ \; `
% [2 w  q# @+ a唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?/ \5 D) s% M3 X8 ~' O3 i

" E, I+ u2 u+ H1 P0 X2 a/ i/ ^我唔認為lor
3 R% K, w* f3 {, y) h9 A2 d# z
唔係話要整死佢地
' w+ l  s7 Y' Y  V& c" N
9 Z1 k( Q1 J( p3 T  M- h: H而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用$ x6 _  e- ~4 g* `8 {, P3 L

7 }! X- Y1 E: g  q我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大, ^" i- O! ]& N: ]- q
- f; ?" G* F' K; x; |0 n! ~3 n: U  h
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
" J2 n& P1 j5 U& U7 A: ^1 U  i. H7 a* V% u
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由6 E1 Y* O4 C# H! G8 U
4 C3 T& \% r* r: n4 \% R0 v" W
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句5 _, ]" a# b/ [3 D
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"  h0 a, q! D6 H/ [% w; J

( \0 U* s! l) j2 ^' d我們的大學生4 W4 O8 W7 v' _: c$ E

! f. K. H/ E* Y
% E/ j; n) ^2 T" f4 _# M" j2 k. |: Q; r2 k

8 C/ Y# ?; E! e: J  X8 g

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:4 _  n, a+ t6 R/ @0 k3 D% {2 ]
* r' r$ n7 f0 e' j, w( H5 H
( _( R+ u1 D( K6 R4 Z
有見地 !!!  [/ C% w& g1 w% h" |3 X
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html. K5 }( I. `  l, A6 g7 g

, N! e) T$ a0 F5 iI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 2 W  J3 g. G: Q0 X! d+ a
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 5 x! V$ Y4 I  r! }/ a2 B/ Z
I pretty sad that about the University official.
  [& w: W8 C) F! n! zIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 Z7 K  i8 D! ?% _4 F8 N) h) b. z) c$ p0 G1 T
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:. K* |) U7 N" E9 F6 @
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
. ~( r5 o- L" z* a' C7 ~4 v1 q0 g( l( X) M& L
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

' h* v0 ~( W2 K' [3 t' I+ i

- _* T, j3 |3 ?. F8 ?! y9 L& J兩者有何分別?+ p. Z8 Y2 L( o: C
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?