奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, r/ w2 e) _7 N4 w% e- `, J
4 t! _. K5 I( K: p; Qagree,9 X  k$ [! t0 f  |/ @3 e
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
$ a$ |  P0 }9 H4 R- O但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,1 I/ l4 [! {2 `
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

6 i- {6 b& y8 E4 m+ o5 nhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# u  Z" A) c: U  V& y3 ^- _7 g已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地4 g/ l: e( L, M- ]! ~( q$ V6 |
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.' Y" D( E: ^$ e
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:/ \, D4 ?1 g8 W" j1 {1 b
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
3 z( B' V) [3 W  y1 Y' S; q- x+ s
4 k/ Y) N) s7 M7 l- f8 m) ?係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
* x  @+ L. D! [" ]' X; h+ z& V1 }- |2 H. a- ^) |: d! {1 O$ D
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

$ `$ n0 }" M: \7 K0 l0 Z0 x7 L" j
; A% B5 W4 S3 U% E. b9 [絕對支持啦! I! O' k( m. w9 q- p8 }

4 U4 ^1 Z; x8 _5 ?  C4 x有錯就認,打就企定4 l8 x' A; O% A# |4 z: m2 g

# A6 G. g0 n/ ?( B: [2 f* ?無錯當然要撐到底! c  @* l: z9 O' Z+ r

/ D. h: }' w$ }+ F但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩+ o. [9 Z  w9 |" S# s3 T+ \0 L2 a

6 J5 x: m) [+ v" _" I6 @" R3 |- D6 ~在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得% Y" g# H7 ]/ ]' d  D
& [* Z% D8 Z; I
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
0 @8 B% N8 F6 l0 ?, Z3 P
# Y& H1 t8 \# L2 j6 w# x3 W+ V. o我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生! U& L* E3 b1 _0 l2 x

, K$ v1 N% ?: k. |1 x  I唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
* N, ?2 g  \1 C4 d: G$ p
! z: x" j7 T' }; `" l我唔認為lor
' u* f* Y1 U9 N: T7 ?/ u1 d+ D" O0 R# \4 [( l, V
唔係話要整死佢地9 L* M) ~' W$ l& d0 J6 P. S* M& G
* }- p5 Q2 `$ `# I
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
8 O$ B3 c& O' Z. c) D' t7 M; l6 c' _8 f
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
' x) P/ ]% Q, g2 H) x% g- R) b6 O( ^  K" g1 m
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
9 @/ t; o5 L$ E2 Q! g% @+ ]0 n7 M$ U* w
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
* f4 d3 z( @4 p( U/ j7 M) u/ B  s& q# ?1 D# [
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句# e$ b) h; d: a
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
/ q2 }: v5 ?" B+ `9 O
6 `1 e, j3 b& U# ?4 L( P我們的大學生
7 f, g$ T* M; f6 C
) _; _( `9 {* K* y% n* z% U' J5 W' I: _5 _
/ @$ `2 H5 x: M9 l5 `6 U5 ^

& d# ]! Q+ u2 ]6 K  v% ~6 E

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
& Y; ~2 V# O7 E9 {! B) d3 K; O7 _: U) p* h% f; S% T5 t4 k
. a, F/ @0 Q$ s. ^2 k+ L2 x
有見地 !!!! a  R" ]& c% Y* x& f- t! A' n
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
+ J4 A2 Z* l& |2 K
" M0 c, W) G# s3 J- _I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 8 x8 a/ k9 O" y! A
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.   [" @6 y$ [& H1 G  a( O# ]
I pretty sad that about the University official.
( s4 e% v+ z# q0 I8 V1 ^It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la9 `8 V& `. t) c( o: a3 F

: s, E* d5 x7 W& r7 D1 A[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:8 p7 C! X2 U+ @. l
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
# v  b0 o$ Y. W% z" P6 A9 S( {  Z, p3 O! Z+ s5 U
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

6 X3 Q2 S; X* B2 r1 Q/ f* b
+ g7 K( v( X, M* h" _兩者有何分別?% x' p3 b/ k+ i8 I  U8 M" h
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?