  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.) o: J0 \' m# q! L" k7 y
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
2 N" y3 q, a# p: }more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.( U- h' a _, H0 f1 F
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
* \. g9 p' Y. o* G5 E5 i) ] iin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.$ M: a1 _. ?3 W1 C
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.( u, @& Q4 Q" W- | Y
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,2 `% ]7 K0 T/ u' D1 e
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
: }1 Y- p0 c) d# u3 F* E, }eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 8 T: D' z+ }7 N4 ^
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
, H. t/ z" ~4 D: C) W8 \5 N2 W: P3 |4 w4 e) _6 P
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.. u4 l7 n: b4 x/ e1 C5 E; o8 J
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
* D5 D- x8 M2 t5 C( \. w9 \: dFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
* Q3 j/ @3 g: ]- Z: `# HA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
0 L) w) u2 H" U* t) R5 LThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 6 I6 L5 Q) u# a8 {$ l, c( X
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
" L6 ~% C3 |3 H* e, t1 }* S
$ R7 ?4 c* b6 D: A[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|