|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.2 p! s9 ?# M, p" ^9 {* @
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,/ b, Z! ~9 t, u+ `, q0 F0 i* E
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
/ ~, K( J8 i. ?! e: ~ B7 ^0 Fmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,9 X8 A6 |+ o) _5 g7 Z
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
0 _0 e" _$ J' EAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency., b% ^. {- w! f& c# A$ P0 c$ |0 Y
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
2 h# Z; R" @1 J6 m$ vnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
, E8 g! g* e0 L4 | {; P4 K% }- Y; Weg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
7 y& V- }2 X4 D Y) j3 R/ Tbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
& J! n2 p* ]9 ^) u
% i' r& P7 E+ X8 dim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.9 t/ C% V" [. s5 A. ~: |! \
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards./ ]& T. U8 R0 e% J2 b. c
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
' ~; p5 {# U9 H) h; V' RA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.6 L# Y! ], S5 U6 q2 M2 f# f
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. " L( i1 d5 V4 \; m
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.9 `) d( W3 g! W3 u" x8 v$ I
# u( d0 {) y1 w0 z* n |9 i[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|