Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:3 z! q9 V9 B4 \: q  X

' R* S: N& e' @; m7 ^2 a- }" H. U. ^3 i* X! w7 n* D  O
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

9 m8 e( q; ]! s5 ]: V! T* ^3 [3 M& X  f4 C
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
8 e5 [3 j0 z. e  i
2 s/ e/ g& I: I  s, q, g+ d
% L( L( I6 a. W- _8 W  @' k; XIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  z3 v. C3 L, p5 `! V& N
4 f4 k  B, `+ g2 yoh really...
- n( i& p5 V8 n$ I& {% V8 bhahhaa, thx a lot^^": j7 d6 t, F& a3 u
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
: C0 \8 o$ r- Z# K. D
6 k* k! M( A- E: o0 d# V" ~( }# F  v當然這是個假設性問題
6 {* o+ l0 j* M% X; y但將人數倍大4 X4 U( Y1 D& T, T
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個% R* r; O- \0 s% h6 ^# {4 T
(情況可以換作其他)* N- {8 z  ^, g/ d
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...2 E- L) K) x4 e5 A4 z4 }7 H+ \
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
4 [. C1 f4 {. j8 m如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:( S0 S* [7 z7 {4 z: B
絕情谷既問題...
1 N# l& E1 p* r0 y4 n) t如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
. M0 W- G- A1 t' z/ C# B7 t% H如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

$ ]4 e% ~1 n3 F% V殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
; ^% `) q" g3 k1 R& a% e於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
3 Q6 l# }) d1 }0 c3 E  S# Z" W& w但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩; b" P/ Y3 b, ^8 Q% }
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
. d9 K$ Y  V. ]1 Q3 C: u其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢$ Z8 @- w" {" M) ^

: D4 z% a& }3 v6 I" T; k& Y我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命. A$ Q% U: k. m3 G! u6 S
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:# _: c% r: e- O8 l, j9 ]
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

4 l% m0 O2 k' h5 W, K% d4 T6 e  F$ ~7 ?6 S% Z$ Q7 P3 e
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣5 y5 }6 a# j6 D/ H3 f6 E3 p+ |: N
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
6 a  t: U6 k2 j6 C' M. n, D
5 ]& N7 F. L$ @$ C5 X9 t& Hp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child/ V% B" c! C- Z* A
yes, my reason is helping more
( z0 k9 L5 c; s4 Lfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!* y/ E( ?* e4 k" x
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child% c; V) m# J4 \' d' }
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
: W, x0 w( j7 ~% `0 S6 F8 H* R5 aalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!) h0 s: u# t0 Y4 R6 J, Z( j
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
1 l& \. p! F3 v' V6 n! [under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
, V& [8 \/ `1 Q, y0 N* f) c# B當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~! j0 N9 y& X' {8 f1 t3 m" q
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~4 x3 [" {( ~; m, p/ a/ X2 `
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~1 L; a5 e% n( h! L
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~9 q- D* y2 c5 n8 y% r9 O
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~, i4 I/ E8 G* a6 P$ J; n0 }
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~+ i5 ~# D  g* t9 s. T
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）