Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
' d3 T: ^2 I. \
' D- Q7 H: K" R$ C# ]: Z- x' G
1 B9 }  b$ c/ y4 }3 W. C0 h. `! H8 @我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 `/ g9 t: T0 m* i2 @! e) F  Q- Q6 A/ r( Z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:. W) r' u6 g9 k, z# U4 h- D: ^

9 E- F! g$ x: z3 h& H
, S5 {/ p  j4 S4 x9 y4 VIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

4 p9 x2 O) P! F/ M! [7 D+ F) t1 e0 f4 j# U7 z+ I% e! w0 W& V
oh really...1 A% f2 ]9 x4 p5 c$ m7 @
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
! a1 |2 R, s. j. o, E; o# Ai didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題% n' d2 c9 h7 u* c" }

" w/ k0 ?' D) k& f3 k$ d9 c8 n  M4 E當然這是個假設性問題
: S0 \6 [  S6 H4 Z# k/ u8 s但將人數倍大
" ]2 f6 C" C: I9 m4 C+ |  B例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
/ s6 k5 B# b/ u" f9 J& L  D# R(情況可以換作其他)$ u* n% w3 i- \/ f% a7 O7 A& h
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...8 {$ a+ S, L2 X; n
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...5 L( ?1 u9 \- L/ v5 K$ Y
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:0 \. p. V- D) b% ^4 j/ \+ |
絕情谷既問題...
$ A" }. o4 h/ c0 U) T- i2 w如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...! {! S5 ?! X' @' p5 v$ ~
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: k2 d% B7 ^3 B* C1 C3 c0 s7 L# b殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好( y% c7 L& `5 Q/ |. e- y0 h
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
0 d% Z5 e6 F" L7 N4 s但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩" [$ r& J) {, \1 c4 y
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢* b6 l' a3 P% |( z, P
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢( k4 _" E- S, i0 Q

+ a" a' u/ t: ]0 T$ \# n0 t+ p我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
) O9 d, W, h/ @8 b4 K4 D3 T% \不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:5 h7 l( D0 ?3 y) j* D
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

! D( X9 h$ M6 o4 I3 z* P3 N" ]
; u0 j1 E$ a6 Ghaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
3 W; @$ G8 @0 T! a! d; y  J1 P你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
- C- I- d, l3 ?7 u, y, @& ^$ h, s+ S, Y+ A, ^! O
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child- v7 x/ f+ D  j3 w- Z) ^
yes, my reason is helping more
- @7 R& U% ~. o7 J+ l/ y7 rfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
) p# w) f/ w$ {/ H6 N2 ]+ l; M8 hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
* D' t8 K4 U+ u( H, d* I* Sbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
- x5 g" p. w8 k: _% Oalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
5 O; y0 ]# G* H. A8 y2 }0 @may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!6 t) ~" F5 M! L6 G* O: w; q
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
, y7 s$ `" M+ d, ]7 X* f' a當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~, n0 |7 C" v3 ^
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 u, u$ }5 Z2 Y  A" K
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~* M: T4 R/ @+ T" C4 n6 L
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
! J/ A8 e" }( Q( ^我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
7 k. p! o+ J8 n2 m5 x2 F) }2 O  c' f) m但如果o係當時o既情況中~~! p- _# }4 [5 `' `. [) `
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）