Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:; A( ]! y& z3 }9 }- [0 g

# F4 N2 ~, E' E$ J2 p+ e7 k. G' Y* E6 V1 ]; e7 o
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

6 e7 K1 x; ^8 L& E* T
2 i0 e1 F- U1 s8 K' N9 ?
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:8 D- h3 c6 O* G  o
! D$ P- g6 }% H  N  h
% n7 t" t" I$ K( O" m, _! a$ \
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& K* N' H/ u8 Z& v! I$ V
: S. e7 p5 }  P" |9 n7 U; v4 }/ Joh really...  P% E. T1 e- R& W' c7 u- @# h
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
. S+ c7 A6 s- @! gi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題  {' k, F/ J% G
: E6 B$ [4 u1 y' W1 u
當然這是個假設性問題) A) u5 J# [) {5 |% \& \  C2 s! a
但將人數倍大8 ?/ L6 a7 Y7 T. q/ p1 t; w
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
2 a- \8 N1 h+ e# x0 h(情況可以換作其他)9 O# v; B7 h+ K; I( z
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
. d. x+ ^3 I2 q- Y% P3 c/ Y如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
% u  x! _9 a4 z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
* }* o  O8 o% |$ N( U, D. Y! B絕情谷既問題...; h! u9 k$ F& _5 f
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' d, |4 Z3 {- B! e7 z  L+ b  `如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

) q: ]+ q, _, W4 D4 {' @, M! e
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好7 q% b) ?5 E5 z; A; a- z4 v" v
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
2 T# e7 E2 B0 \7 L' m但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩6 Z/ \* v' R! o: t; [
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢- t* h9 D2 P( R; ^7 w$ P, T" B" w2 b% d
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢6 T. A' j- V( y1 _7 _) ?" i& v+ f
3 S. ^6 ~2 b6 F" U: I8 z
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
' ~! f6 W- }) n) x  D9 K不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
9 r- |1 b9 X. u! D6 W* e( F* h其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- `8 @6 z  e9 y! B8 i! Y
0 o% w6 ?* Q2 t+ X  F: v1 w8 Nhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
4 k+ K/ K* v; s8 W: E  ^) w你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....6 l: h9 y& c' l0 c
0 t$ ~" Z0 G* D6 f& F' V7 j
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child- I* I0 u0 P  X# C  s
yes, my reason is helping more
* e: y+ a- V) _! Z8 ufor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
. e* t* s# h0 u7 C, g% e0 Eif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child8 P  m4 h( W$ _  V- G: c
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
: {) ^2 \, d/ F0 p7 ]also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
4 \) |$ B. _- T( p6 [may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
2 W( }- K' r$ C5 z5 N- D( @% dunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~" y* B( }/ o. J* x8 h
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~# j, u( a" q* }5 k0 {; F+ B
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
* W0 [( v& N1 G9 z. P( ?( U3 F正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~" y3 K5 `% |" O6 }" y0 F
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
* _' S' [. F7 E+ ~# _7 A+ d我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
2 O0 N* a9 z, ~/ `但如果o係當時o既情況中~~& U7 E5 Z+ n0 H  h
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）