Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
9 W$ F) ~0 N& Q( Q
) e* L" ~5 ?% @7 E; C* I7 P* x- s  j* \* r; @4 T- I) B& Z& b4 b
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

8 h- a1 Y  v7 U; O+ I
- I: n" ]8 K5 U
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:1 w% F) y5 N8 Y3 [, |# ]

* [" e( o& A( {6 Y5 e  U7 x: f/ P  Y% X; r1 F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  ?) M- k  G% C. Q+ k
2 N( h% F1 D9 s; o9 b$ f* H: u7 B* Hoh really...* I  p/ [& q  j3 ^% H
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
- J: G2 @$ x. t& L" r# a) \3 zi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
! C- F4 ?# N0 v9 Y8 u  W; c. d+ W2 h( l0 f/ C
當然這是個假設性問題
: ?" D* C+ a+ w/ w2 _% z3 n2 D0 z) e- w但將人數倍大
8 i+ r) q5 g5 m8 b. j: @, J. W例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個4 ?& X# p# V6 y, D
(情況可以換作其他)
" F3 g) c2 @* X  v' f4 }8 y  J" [* \始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
6 n8 ^4 y4 p: g3 N如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  g- v' \9 l; p
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
, d4 ^% w! M, T$ Q% G/ r絕情谷既問題...
5 L0 j. N6 k& P如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...! h+ ~9 Z- ^4 u$ P5 ^
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, `0 F' A5 b$ b4 a7 L2 u4 w, h
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好! u' O  e8 s. k" n
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
& |$ W/ y% y- y但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩0 x/ g* H, u3 O
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢2 @- d. y8 C( D' o% E$ x
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
2 T, s$ ~' e& n' u( D& I  B) }6 H4 A
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
/ D% v8 }  k8 s  b不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
1 ~: G: a. u4 C% F% C) x$ V2 L其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

9 W' \, L# N' k2 H/ y+ Y# b3 o$ q5 u; [' k! @( x. m# e' \
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
+ w( X* j: `0 D你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....3 Q  `8 L( u0 }. I& l7 ~

+ j8 F) e& h+ p& ~p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
5 `9 N3 B2 f3 K: jyes, my reason is helping more
; R; _. i. R6 p' e* _for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
' f1 g# o/ p/ B" Fif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
  V  _4 E/ w( f' b2 zbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
% n! C5 c( m& xalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!0 s$ |& }7 M) K: ~# J& p! n% c
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!/ B+ N# O" S' ?3 P
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
' Y  @6 C/ p/ x當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) T/ F7 K. t3 H$ c) ?/ K- }$ @
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- ?! D( {2 Q& c; R, C# S, @, f& L
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~8 `: [& r- [1 _' r& h
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
* a) @. t: v) K( H7 b' d我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
, v2 e/ ]* t7 u8 u# @9 r但如果o係當時o既情況中~~5 ~' @/ H! y2 o. f5 k' S
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）