Rika

由最好排到最壞
; p" u9 D2 l; A) y; W# s# ]F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong9 d+ J& G4 i/ |/ ~
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
9 p. G- P, Z% S% O5 @7 w" o  YS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
# D+ l1 h, b  m/ c' v; R8 p  |M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure3 g5 @6 }) g) \( J5 K0 J1 [
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:. V  l& b* |! m4 l

* d0 I6 E8 _; r9 S) y. q$ eM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人. K: e0 Q2 Z# l4 z% ]8 z

# t3 H! I/ t7 p# F# rS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
- W6 }% k0 ~, u* o/ O     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!5 T) }% g4 V3 U5 G1 p

% T; N- `1 }/ e) e# E  N* b) qB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做- h* O( Q. \0 V0 j; o! U1 H

* ]* V0 F8 Y. b) ~4 \L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志$ N7 N, ?5 Z' |. E) ]
+ k" N% P5 t- m/ n4 y/ t7 }
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
% P  r+ g: {8 y$ u/ Z9 }8 q7 N     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
8 F  d3 `% y3 W+ W
4 c0 R) q) T- _/ L" L- d( Y[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
3 q; X# x- h* D4 e+ Q! O- M& w: a而家答多次! w7 S6 }8 J+ y* ~; p  V; o% Q8 c
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
' z& |. ^: t9 R$ c9 ~l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架6 h- p& z. K' g
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢( O1 b1 L: ?, s' N* {
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.' \  @2 q2 ]; [) a  R. N  G3 D1 D
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S8 {3 K+ x  T  F" n

; g7 C- D1 F- Z+ EL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
; }2 |' q2 O0 b0 G8 p' E. t: ^2 jF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
2 d9 ?) M$ a3 ~: S0 aM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒+ M) D. x  ?9 q3 r
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢2 L$ s% _/ U' B$ S" I, D* d
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
6 [" n* m' `% z! a2 I( }2 BF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"' C& w2 Y$ v* u' `  f# Y/ q+ A  X
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取  |, V% [1 M  X% _" |# S2 v) e/ M
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
' x0 W* N; S( L9 `9 CL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果5 D' B' @7 ~- X" l( [/ G! V
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情' _- w0 n9 t4 E  U
$ L$ G- D0 _3 _( A
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
% z: r( O; b9 ?! @( fL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
- R" x! Z: ^! A! t2 JB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘3 Y( W: j. r8 J& \; j
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) C6 z& a  ~8 f( e, x
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方# a) Y6 i9 H4 Y* I7 c
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

% u/ H+ V4 ?* \, s4 w% b) J/ U0 Z' ~9 |
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
- d* H" e% I8 k3 p8 h7 j  l! T* |% q$ h9 ^! @5 H
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river    u3 J) c# `8 y' A! A

* ?( U5 g- n( E9 p" F+ jS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
# `- I! N& {2 R4 z  n( |% ~5 J1 ^: @
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
* ]% e+ w  C* l3 ^/ f+ ^6 c
" Z& {2 ~: p+ BM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
; o4 t4 ^; k& }, A9 L
9 d1 V: u' Y! U) ?; L3 `( B8 n' m) z[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 M" M5 O8 r0 g) J
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
8 `% I* p; j/ ~! DL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點# w3 l. r/ U/ g5 m% Q4 i$ Q
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
. d8 X/ _$ ~5 T
, ^& ]' s- x  j/ n) U$ H' [最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....9 p" L& z+ R* |  F7 [8 X
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，, G8 o5 C0 i, s1 }4 Y, i/ A
由最好開始排起既話，
- b8 x3 ~8 J5 r. s$ W3 R% [& @7 XL B M F S 啦，( G/ n8 s; |% L4 V
. Z# @; F, j$ S* s  T" G
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
" z; Q, c, k$ W: P. W; D6 @1 Q但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？  a/ x/ R7 J# s; U
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- z) X3 ?' ?2 u7 I4 Q& r又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。# ~8 b; X8 g, v
5 A5 p% m& _& C
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，. ?2 Y1 Q9 g8 w/ \- I8 o
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，3 t# C3 n+ M# r. T: {- u7 G
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。/ W; j) O' f& r3 B6 z, k
) m/ A9 p4 t6 [8 B" ^* [
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
4 C9 v7 H) v, w/ U6 T) j M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
% i* f( \8 D# Z+ |亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 {, L7 T  ]9 Z/ J4 e) Z$ W; p! q5 q
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 {8 \" o0 b! y1 n, ]. @
M 都可算壞了。0 J: B; L" Q5 V0 P# v
% n" c! D" Y) |+ v5 D, C
F 呢個人仲掂，
9 G3 w! [; g8 R知道既唔等於要講，
. J* W, v; N: w$ G9 T如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
8 G% L" L% H: ?) E, Y$ ]+ ]我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
0 a5 W( ^( C2 p' g9 S2 Y$ i* o) N  b+ e6 L( S1 V. ^# {
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，! ~, x& Q# K- V4 Q% v
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。+ Y/ |/ A* U1 O, T

" R- u5 g: D; @* j' {/ S0 z2 Z% |
. ]2 ]# N' F! m4 e! i9 G, ?; W! z3 S; _2 O
題外話：
' ?: ]. H9 Y' H9 d唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
7 A. S4 O& n' m& l睇到 S 呢條友，
4 S4 E& Y8 p! M0 q' x+ w- h我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L2 y& N( r- c* m0 M8 h

5 ^) n2 M7 Y1 ?: E3 nS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!% H; _( C; k% R/ \. s, E7 O! \
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
$ Q% M8 I# D+ x7 O$ sM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她; ?, l3 h! J" m, V  g' c) n* M+ W+ q
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
, v- I5 z- q+ c3 r! }L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...