Rika

由最好排到最壞
& M7 x9 U5 k5 B) _% w7 a, ]& AF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
$ [0 s- u& D- X& WB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
/ u! B$ p+ C& L% x7 o) CS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; `; d( B4 _6 f+ s' c6 f. P
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
4 ^+ d6 H1 m! `0 dL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:7 B1 u) o! f) o; }5 P- S

* @" o; y) F) g8 O2 \: wM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人7 D  F, D! ]/ w7 Y% i

+ R* ]3 ]3 U- H+ DS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)5 r/ c  N2 K5 T/ X# W- Z9 Q! r3 u
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!- |) L! b1 b. e
" X3 @" z( b' R
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
3 _, j  n4 [  q% y/ X7 Q
9 N) k5 _  [5 }3 e; L# yL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
, z3 \/ l, K" p2 g$ p' s; R# {" u2 A3 c2 \* s
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,) b5 }0 R# f/ }" O4 }8 q' [
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好3 p( E- E/ M6 m: {4 @7 T; r# D

) W4 T; n; S7 ], s& F[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
9 `( P" j- h, H& k1 X而家答多次
$ H3 Z$ ^( {. F# r" Mf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽+ a5 `( D( A: `
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架5 {) n, `$ j4 ~$ T8 F
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
5 I) m' ]! L! ^" j0 xs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
) v  f1 W# G5 w5 {m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
5 V+ U" F" [9 f; X# ]' d
" [6 t  E. h" @+ X" ?& }* ?L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
, s0 Z; [/ @9 Q0 VF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度6 ?' p+ L* ]! v: T  b. J
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒4 F& h' m; s* A! K/ B
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢" f& x# ]1 U8 v
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
3 l4 L8 h! Q! |* o' ^3 ~3 f% j& EF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"5 p& W: A9 r8 }& T8 i1 U
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
( V5 S9 E0 L0 m% X+ jM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法0 \3 c- v( F5 n2 G7 L! G' A
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
5 v/ ~+ U+ W# s% E  M. [( `9 C# oB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
9 w9 @* w* g; P& e8 Y0 d( b4 {$ a& i. ~- i  c
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:- }6 K3 ~- y  h( }$ U
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己, m) ~. `/ m4 d1 v- a/ u" i
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘2 k2 R, n' s7 a2 r
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
/ t6 J% a2 [8 p! F1 zF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
0 @- W! }2 a3 t+ L4 c/ fM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  P/ O8 s( x% G  r5 w  W! O* `
7 F- w) {: o8 S; x' w6 f1 H5 k same choices with u , but want to add some comments ( t  A; B, l6 X7 h+ U- l9 Q

2 {3 U1 C# w: z; {( B! nB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
. A; i- S3 r3 ~0 G& w. I- W8 S/ |% S9 l  }* t" J
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
  y0 h! a% |$ c7 d" z- v
' j4 O! F( Z1 E: y2 cF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 0 G. y' w# m3 ]; B" j; p

% s. ^: O$ ^/ v9 iM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......9 i7 N" c+ i( d6 Z5 q3 \

) V) ^4 t+ s( C( t[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
3 L' f3 m8 E- e* v8 Z3 RM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
4 m# @% [" b, }+ q6 TL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
) B8 b! q  `4 R- g; j' ^) }3 lF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 h5 u6 m$ a; s9 V; W2 g6 T! f- b2 O
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
- H8 O$ b) X# z( U# i有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
% ^3 Y- b1 E( q# m% Y) \: i& `6 g由最好開始排起既話，
0 N7 i3 x; }! k: ^, Z0 J3 Y, j- JL B M F S 啦，
( Q: `/ J7 @! H/ d" ?( u; J5 f  v( Q
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，. R8 J* j4 y2 M+ P( X  O- S
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？( P' [+ ^9 C" K/ Z% s$ ?7 v
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？& j1 d7 G! u# m  I% r/ h% o; g" z
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。, |; N; |7 B5 k$ G3 l

1 ?) u& l! _. n- y0 T% b6 X而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
4 z/ L( u' Y1 @( F所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
2 K" f. @# M2 G! X! `! j明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。7 A$ V2 A) p2 O( t

, H  e* d3 s0 C' r- j4 L而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
+ _( f+ t& m- b: n5 s  s M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
$ y3 A' }' z7 {3 u  P亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，6 h3 [8 A$ p+ o& i
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- ]# j8 }2 [. F& L  W. D2 }
M 都可算壞了。+ z: x9 S1 h! T5 ?0 |5 C
  p9 Z$ H7 q; C" W! ]5 g( ^$ V
F 呢個人仲掂，
+ f1 ?' R) k2 j# _知道既唔等於要講，4 }$ K1 v! j0 z  D. U
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' K  i2 S' D1 f
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。4 a& _+ r0 g2 h2 r& {5 e
1 a2 u! @# D4 D2 O
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 k8 I; J7 R+ k' n0 p. z
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
/ q4 u; I  ?/ L- }3 p8 I
/ R( A& H6 }5 v% g7 l% S. L: s" [. Y% |

  ^8 l" k* i) Q- g/ ?% T9 s題外話：5 {& w8 J+ J4 z9 w' z( U' r- m- l
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
8 u: v  ?7 o$ D2 r& f8 A睇到 S 呢條友，9 I6 ?) E. k! S' p
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L$ u0 m4 ?( F3 Q, w& t. i2 c! T
2 O0 i# P' j+ W# a
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
8 z: j7 u" M- HF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
$ F. Q+ ?: ^: sM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她: ~$ m* F: D! O  ?) g0 R8 ]/ C
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害. X/ A# o: u5 q' G  `; P
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...