Edison

i will kill all of them lar because we are already over population and wt is the point to live with them??? It is their planet so wt?? what is they backstap us then we will all die, to kill them first is a good way to prevent war between us and them, once they die we got nothing to worry about.

RyuII

ok, 假設現在已決定要埋佢地單, 咁會用乜野方法呢?
9 t- @3 p# E) [/ W1 \4 A  [, W, g正如之前有位仁兄所講如果逼佢地上絕路可能佢地會黎招同歸於盡或一拍兩散, 咁點做先係最高明呢?

RahXephon

我諗共存的機會不大，最終都會爆發戰爭，以武力解決問題。( u4 K2 u1 z' |$ h# t
/ j8 S2 S: f' m1 E0 d- B4 d
從歷史的角度看，由於雙方的實力有差距，最後只後征服與及被征服的結果。 自古至今人類有和平，是因為國與國之間有Balance of Power。 當這個平衡被破壞了之後，戰爭只是遲早的事。. N5 e: S7 k0 W# T+ a/ q+ n$ F
+ `5 |/ j4 X' V/ ]$ Q% @1 l5 D* S
其次是資源的問題，資源是有限的，根據進化論，物競天擇，有能力者會爭取佔用最多的資源，這是動物界的法則。 既得利益者(原居民)又怎會放棄自己所擁有的，與一些不知名的外來生物分享？ 縱然現代有所謂共享利益，已發展國家同發展中國家一同發展，達致雙贏的說法，但別忘記這是已發展國家經歷了殖民時期的掠奪後，在近代提出的冠冕堂皇的說法。 假如真的有雙贏的話，那麼第三世界國家還是這麼的窮？ 歷史是會不斷重覆自己的，在新的星球由於勢力的不平衡，只會引致掠奪的情況。8 l( d" n8 d/ D1 ^1 B/ ~2 @( a2 \
0 o& T2 h' n1 L$ h+ J. F# z7 K
如果大家有睇Matrix第一集的話，記得agent Smith對人類有一段很深刻的形容：「人類就好似細菌一樣，每去到一個新的地方，就會秏盡當地的資源，不斷的分裂擴散...」
1 H3 c$ D% O7 g" |; z  f2 v$ B0 U! i0 [% i; y, R
[ Last edited by RahXephon on 2005-7-10 at 12:18 PM ]

simc23

"最勁o既武器只有核彈"，咁同佢打扙都好易兩敗俱傷架喎2 ]+ @3 u% H' J- F) V% U; |5 X
兩邊都扔幾個，個星球都冇得剩
! Q6 W& ~1 R" u; E4 h) ?但如果o個個星球D生物蠢D，地球人一樣會去消滅/征服佢地7 T% C: m7 j6 Z
就好似美國佬去到新大陸，D印第安人都變左瀕臨絕種

csstudent2003

呵呵 , 我會消減它們 , 人不為己天朱地滅 , 雖然它們的科技尚未超越我們  , 但畢竟日子有功 , 況且2個星球不論文化背景及生活模式均有不同 , 因此若在它們已成氣候才觸怒了它們已然太遲了

安心

同佢地和平共住~
. M6 g4 ^: u+ ~' N大家無分等級~! N# Q1 ~# F$ H* J, g
以德服人~一定可以長久安穩

hoho886

如果去到個個星球生活，冇得變既話
- h! o- S/ @6 G' }就會同個到ｄ生物和平共處，因為我
. i3 G( q4 ~5 o; ^4 o2 K地大家冇咩令到人地受傷害既野，就唔1 v1 t' H# f! b& \
會消滅佢地，因為佢地都有ｄ咁勁武器0 U& V3 m( d  C
，同佢玩我地都未必會ｗｉｎ，咁仲會" b2 C8 k( j: ?2 d
整到自己受傷，除非真係佢地做既野好$ b. M) @  O; M
黑人憎，頂佢唔須，真係忍無可忍就一1 G! c7 z1 T# r; ^* X2 C) K" Z
定會消滅佢地．
: K+ R! z) j7 v8 b0 e不過我都覺得佢地唔會傷害我地，大家都
$ Y/ E9 _7 \* D1 u5 e9 Z+ Q1 L會和平共處，如果唔係大家都有損失．3 ?. _$ i% w- R, A# h1 l
因為可能佢地都會咁諗

旺角fit人

0甘 大 獲，0米 死 0羅！

Little Boy

我假設那種外星人都是和人類差不多
1 S/ V6 w, a) Z  a我想, 戰爭最終都是會出現的8 d2 `+ f* Z8 I
因為人是有私心的, 誰會願意把自己的地方與人分享?
9 X4 D8 [6 L' _8 W一時三刻, 出於援助, 暫時把別人收留都或許會有
2 |  C  s- T+ x7 J但如果是落地生根, 長期一起生活, 就肯定會有磨擦, 為什麼要和別人分享自己的資源呢?7 X# c9 t/ O+ F2 I) x* l# B, u! m8 ?
就好像美國在南韓或日本駐軍咁
; E5 w" u3 ]) Z% J( h* w; }4 a當地人根本已不太願意, 只要有什麼美軍強姦/非禮案件出現的話, 便立即牽動人們那種反美情緒. P, M  i3 H5 I$ P( N

* P/ F2 B( B6 ]' d3 u# T! `無論外星人人多又或者人少, 對方有核彈... 如果真係開起戰上黎... 這個星球, 在戰後還會否依然適合人類居住呢?  恐怕最後一拍兩散...9 P; k  C" _2 `# e

8 Y/ @$ A1 j9 @! G% q, o/ s7 U所以, 我覺得最初應該嘗試首先和平共存先, 但同時要暗地裏為日後那場不知何時會來臨的戰爭積極備戰.

Ninka2005

First of I had to thank raymond302 and Edision because they wrote their replies in English.  Without their replies, I have NO idea what the heck the topic is about!  hehe* n. S% g1 U' S# R5 `

- \4 ]: G/ l' U" u( n4 ]$ AI just finished watching War of the Worlds and coming out of that movie it makes me think that we (as humans) can be soooo weak compared to other beings in the universe.
* G. d' z1 R# M0 r- z. D3 }
- X7 q/ e9 N3 _To those that don't believe in 'aliens', I watched a movie a long time ago...forgot the name of it but Judy Foster was in it.   She was asked by a kid "Are there 'aliens' in out there? (paraphasing)"...  I really liked her answer 7 Y# [; J2 v* ?) h1 l
$ D# K0 z/ J3 a2 R! y4 Q
"There are more stars in the universe than sand on earth.   If we (humans) are the only one in this universe than wouldn't be a WASTE of space?"3 _! c, g$ o8 o

' M0 k6 {, Y% [1 d2 ^' HI don't believe we have ever been visited by 'aliens' but I do believe that there are other 'life' in the universe." ^# g4 n8 p' Q9 L
2 C( z! K! v0 H) _. f
If 'they' do come to earth then there is really not much we can do... Therefore, to ask "what we should do", in my opinion is not relevent.   Our only action/response to the 'aliens' should be the same 'intentions' as the 'aliens'.   ie.  if they are nice then we should be nice but if they want to kill us then we fight back and hope for the best.   Lastly, for all the reglious group out there, I don't believe in god but if there comes a day where we are under attack by 'aliens', I HOPE YOUR GOD CAN SAVE US! hehe =P+ g# E( H4 s- t% m5 l
  v- S6 x% h- K" u; q- Q
Ninka