Rika

由最好排到最壞
. b. A, S- B7 \F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
  P: ~# b" {. Y4 V! [  bB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
: k4 ^: D6 c, s; v; OS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her$ g$ i2 o+ R# e2 P3 t4 r
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure8 @& s) E0 K; G- B
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
- t: o. x( y$ F2 `- T
1 P/ E6 G7 ]5 TM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人( [$ y3 r$ K0 p# d; i- S
9 v' ~6 E+ |! x
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)# a: G3 R" h. L' K
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!+ v5 X2 _; P  M( u" P" k+ G# x
7 y- M* x1 C2 h2 X5 q* J9 E) ^1 ~
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
+ \4 o2 l0 Q8 {0 O8 y; q# N5 L
. |7 W* h- c" l1 z5 u) ^L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志0 t) o3 T: E8 X" p
4 L' B5 M3 r* `* O
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
: C0 Q+ s' D7 u1 P: ^- p* i     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
0 X& y( n/ k! w* {6 U3 j- X, @) ]" y/ \5 e! A9 u
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案9 @9 b7 U: P+ B, B  \% D4 ]
而家答多次1 {$ R- M# [" l  ?
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
, @$ B. H0 }0 J* {. Gl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
  M, A" E! H" lb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢) Q( t& a2 u% h
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.- s0 p7 M8 v: i( R+ a
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
* E1 A3 r1 I+ @
5 T" T+ P3 I- c6 k/ O# jL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大& \( q1 c) v* g; x
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度6 i1 e% y8 t# H2 d; E  l" n
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒# J1 B, x7 F/ h
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
2 d* s( O7 [/ {4 X, rB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
/ z2 V/ P+ O' N5 W, ^F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"8 H& o. r3 i$ x9 ~! p" b
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
) t. L  \3 Y& v6 uM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法* Z) B4 r- h5 ]) m# ?2 D
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果  p* q& [, a7 \. Q4 }+ f" n9 c
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情% j9 b! ~# e1 U
/ ^8 _6 Z6 G8 Z/ m; R
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
' D& h) l+ y. V% a2 hL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 O$ ]8 i0 `- O0 ?B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘9 L% a: Y" h/ L* p. A
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
( s& b  @6 z/ \( c5 xF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方- }% s; a7 V3 A. w% Q* o. B5 P
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- r! `7 [  x# L6 S5 b$ ^" [+ q$ N# _/ \& E
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
% z* i# O7 ~1 \" O/ z1 p3 ]1 P% O& a7 i; v( X& ^& j) v5 ^
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  : u8 r2 k" Z  B- q9 T+ V4 A

* x. n+ r8 z/ u  ^7 jS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )! t- u7 I; |0 [6 T- o" X  M# ?
: |( E' {6 q+ H$ \
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome : ?2 n/ {1 @: y- b+ P$ I
  q  S4 e! u, Q4 ]( D. I1 E/ Z( n4 S
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......" V# z+ Y1 ^4 _* k' U
8 Z& ^" s+ F9 k: T
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 j- l  r4 J; y( G6 z+ S) q
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢6 z" {% Y- q- _% U% k4 y$ P4 D
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
+ z4 X" I/ J) BF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
) a( d0 ^5 A) j. J) W% G) Y! y- D- x1 W  G3 e
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
2 P8 n7 O& F9 B, R4 |, K有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
- J3 {  M2 C$ T, c8 K+ a: t由最好開始排起既話，- ]0 G7 y5 j& F' ?, ^6 Y* E
L B M F S 啦，! S' v7 w# o% c# y+ L7 P4 Q6 g

9 Z" d- z2 \; d8 f其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" w' x9 k, k  n( \
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
1 G9 q  ?  [3 `- t如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？/ k3 I0 ^, R0 U
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
0 g& o; f. g8 [! N8 b5 g8 R) o5 x2 b3 E' M4 M3 X  V8 |0 n" h( }( Q
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
8 P% F: E" G* E7 g所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
9 N* o* V+ h; Z2 }明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。: j" A2 y5 X3 c' D
  c; s) s. h- h1 H4 [
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，( @5 s8 L' ^4 R9 A4 }& ]! O
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
& U; A1 Q) |) V亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
) F* G5 k3 [  l$ F* A! \知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，  e  ]+ n/ M: F% S' `9 b/ M! u
M 都可算壞了。4 Y7 U5 F! t( B# i& m1 [
( u& z1 l( l  p1 K6 e
F 呢個人仲掂，! m4 @6 |) e& I+ @# a( |! e
知道既唔等於要講，
5 g$ ]8 I. A2 x. w/ `如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
) \( @! W0 O8 w1 l  s! l我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
3 `) b: E; U# Q" ?# R0 Z6 |- X" ?2 ~3 J: Y/ N( n
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，% Y( O2 X/ Z/ W6 ~& X
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
) h6 d1 j5 m6 Y% R5 w" F9 ^/ n3 }8 A! y' g5 A

$ B$ w1 w( a9 L$ ]' O( f; U" e- t3 @+ W3 F! z
題外話：; X' V; v5 H/ C& i
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，4 c" @* q# e) H. f* \
睇到 S 呢條友，
! n& l; y+ k' C我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L3 Q9 i( F9 f7 B& g, o9 ?

: `% D5 i: X" O$ ]/ t9 ?S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!& D! B* L( i* d% L, {' j/ ]
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
, \/ |5 ?0 n) E/ q+ @) WM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她  ^5 @: m. W6 g
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害! v0 P4 K4 O/ v3 a
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...