Rika

由最好排到最壞7 m7 n* F" g# d- \# f
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 P: ?$ {1 m0 k/ |  ]B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount! c7 u8 `2 j: S1 f% ?6 n  a. S6 j
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
; I: @8 Q6 _8 ?$ G) {M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
9 R6 u" ]# a1 h  O; QL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
4 m2 }" X1 d; @% z
7 ]- t! J% I* F; K- K% {M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
# k' l/ r; e! n( c( T/ {6 Y" \- |9 s4 o4 @0 d3 ?
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)3 O5 B: v+ m6 c; O, Q: U. i
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
1 f  y8 t: J' f/ K: o
/ |9 ~! z& @0 f8 L2 m$ a  qB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
& l1 z( [- G  N$ m! F6 T) U& a0 g9 n# f/ W9 ^
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志3 ^4 Q  U1 B0 ^# g
) L+ {7 e2 m5 r% f1 z  S2 e- z
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
6 T" p0 Z* b9 J5 Z0 E& t2 U- V, u6 a( Z     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
3 v: E/ H8 n! r6 W
5 c+ p1 E6 E2 B[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
8 _5 Y0 h2 E+ K, c, W而家答多次: P( p  Y8 V) _  p; G, I# f
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽; l# T% d  ?; g+ Q
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
( o! G1 t& A" ?: k- h+ O! U$ m, xb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
% X0 S. s/ d/ o- c+ Y) ]5 F9 Us: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
8 s9 v0 l+ r) hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
; g9 }9 Q6 ^2 Y2 B+ y- ^' `3 g; l% j' q& ?. V2 z/ p. \/ W
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大$ b: `7 L& [0 X" E& Y
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度: M7 U' M& X) M# U% i! [: W4 Y
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
$ h; R; [1 a& V- G! wS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
* e2 {3 E0 j6 MB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
$ i9 o) z; y2 {% T# }! N2 UF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
/ n# e  A/ p: k" f: pS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
; r+ R3 s% l4 N$ ?4 |5 WM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法: C0 k3 U9 x. x) @* ^: `
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
( ^9 N. E% ]9 R3 m. EB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
2 k; n' t# H; l
8 }: M  p$ L- X& M世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
$ ]: v: L5 q8 ?  l0 V9 H/ l* R- W! {; r! dL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
% \- X# l1 \# FB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
2 P5 Q) |* \* r7 C/ ^- Z' D/ pS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件- j: d  b# M$ r) Q4 l
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
  C6 F: G; E9 R% }M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 t' f- p; i3 w, R4 N' O9 [) Z( D- W. L; F
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
/ Q, s* z4 E; o/ q( W
2 v) p/ |4 x+ r, UB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
6 m! |+ s% e, ~$ z' S4 H( \/ t6 {' x' I
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
. Y) G5 x' s/ ?- \8 G
- ^' C6 ]; g# b# C# HF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 5 K$ y- y, F# P8 g  g

; n2 [' C% q! ]( h; p7 K7 w" ~M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....... Y9 P0 T+ b* b: A* g

6 F2 M5 T0 \( R, }) i$ m[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge) ~0 d2 ]4 X2 o( b3 v2 |
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢( M) C% e9 _, T' B/ |: W0 C0 Z4 E
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點2 G$ F0 @. s/ f! i& k  V
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma9 `5 [) I7 ]1 o# J( v% \

$ X6 A/ ]4 D% z( E( J( r% y/ |最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
1 m# \& r8 L* x, V有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
" ?* _8 v6 _9 A. E, i/ D4 a" I3 ?由最好開始排起既話，
) P1 q2 r( F! M* M. oL B M F S 啦，
1 H. C7 i$ `% N' H( S- c) L. W
/ M! I8 v( H0 y. p其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，' e- a6 e! U5 t
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
! @, e. p! R' N4 n' B- q如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
+ A" y0 b3 Q  e; }- T4 e又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
- c- k# @( @$ G0 [+ m4 u! t" v: X9 S+ }. y# V5 D$ k: E9 R; a! l
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
1 R/ C- _$ p' V' U& h/ H9 A所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
; Y% C, ]$ R1 {; d1 e6 n明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* }8 z! N* }% |0 X
& x" I' x- t" T/ _( h而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，+ u3 [. l; |1 N6 B+ _
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 a& t5 L5 h* x. Z, A亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
7 J/ c  D. I7 o# Y知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
" a1 Z6 q# z% d0 ?- U1 G$ z M 都可算壞了。8 L0 w2 o) J' ^: U: `! J9 l

6 ]  O# e; J  r+ w F 呢個人仲掂，
8 o( B; n5 F' {知道既唔等於要講，* v* ~, K  r' k- Q
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，2 a' v4 L4 H+ w. a" J* ^# k$ {
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。4 o. O' P' p/ E- i) p' [( H- P; e
; Q( n; o( S: K$ y
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，$ D0 p! v! X" A  N
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。6 j2 E) E$ x* I% m( j
0 m+ J6 F7 L' D- O' ]3 T

$ L% F2 Y" L' m; e
# d3 c) z( p2 f+ a, E$ p  v5 G題外話：
/ u) `: Q% h' h唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，0 M1 H0 F3 z' D
睇到 S 呢條友，4 w/ m& ^' V: \# ^0 k: `
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
- A# u4 j: P& ]- w
9 n( L4 M) U! G" r, \2 L. u; f. AS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
% i3 F( `( f! h' C2 I+ GF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
5 T. V% g* G# y5 }1 y. t0 wM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
1 l& x! W- d: D/ T( ZB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
5 |# P$ C7 t8 R2 V: ^! IL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...