Rika

由最好排到最壞
: a( S. h, J: s. q8 [F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
" O8 i3 X4 o+ b6 {B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
# G, u  I1 F: g: ~" z& OS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
3 o; I" r) t/ [9 n" d3 HM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
5 {% V! S3 N5 E$ q& A9 ~L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
9 X' K' I. [: w# F: o3 @6 A9 G
/ @$ y: z& `1 Q  y2 @7 ?( FM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人8 T; I! v4 z2 d6 m9 @4 P& a$ y

" r+ Y. P0 T2 _S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)- u- Y# [2 A2 ]3 y; ^5 @
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
  i* o* @/ v5 ?( t( u8 N. [  }9 s8 L& J+ ]6 M% b, X
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 ]' `% |& m, }, x! q

$ `5 F& i/ C5 n) z' a; Z  ]L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
* j' N. q. Q  \, S+ e6 k
1 c7 f% j3 T1 }' ]- V+ EF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) H+ i9 D. i8 V* O% f     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好  r; j. i+ y  A( ^

6 ?1 N" ~( h7 ^' e) W[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案% M: A, t$ Q. ~. N/ _+ z: [: h
而家答多次
& Z/ j8 j1 t# S& A; `f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽* i2 A  Z7 v" T$ E4 O, m
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
( I! C0 L/ _7 d( ob: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
0 G/ ]1 {4 @& X3 S+ Ys: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願., d6 Y* H$ Q( D' Q' g
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S. Z  r- S% ^- L. g% N

: J% o, O4 E' F# j# o7 G1 w9 @L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大$ S% J* r/ e+ f8 K7 }- b
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度4 f7 W( J5 [, \8 b6 F6 d
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
* H* d; z* j8 N+ D5 R. M4 M3 BS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢7 {1 R5 t' Z. A, o5 r
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
1 o5 x$ A: O* j5 ]F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"' t6 @( j* u9 @9 w, b
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取- ~: E+ s7 }0 c$ q" E! K% {
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
& b5 `# a% e/ ?/ I$ \$ oL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果/ c6 w. K3 F3 s- O9 s, [6 e
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
1 _- l& M1 k6 r7 E8 _6 z5 S0 S
! j1 X8 a+ Y# B3 K世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
  B3 s7 l2 P+ B/ [2 }$ f2 AL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己' j$ h% X8 N. H( Q5 Y
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
( w6 n& a, d, R1 @8 QS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
- Q, {$ t% m9 }* aF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方% \8 D/ f6 B# G6 f7 e0 I
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 G# z8 y; X; e# I7 j

; @  G. x9 p8 \! d% v# I8 H same choices with u , but want to add some comments : z% n' L% h( G  |9 t  v

! q  ^0 S9 `* `* H- a8 z. CB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
. L+ _8 Z" n1 O# u% p: h) h1 D- X% K$ J* W# L
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )1 x* a! c' J) {! G
* m* U( F/ r& C" j% ]
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome / U; O1 y" {2 l2 R7 }/ U

, [7 Z* t- M* j' \' s0 cM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 }+ N2 _' k) |1 U& j) D, o
. Q9 j) n0 @" L8 |: g  D+ |
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
8 L) k) N* u- Q3 I5 DM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢" n; _% H6 @9 p6 L5 q
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點- j( O5 W6 ~7 L7 X; `" Y
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: [+ g- c; H  v' @2 X
( K) Z3 q6 d* A$ C
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
3 W: q( x( y, M7 P7 g$ Q2 v+ r  a有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
2 V$ {: T# ?* }" d8 a/ b' u/ E由最好開始排起既話，, Z- E* ?, ?/ f0 }7 @9 k: |4 n9 [
L B M F S 啦，, A9 I2 H: L; b; {" n5 ]
6 R- ?  W8 b: k  m
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- N" i  n0 e* s但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？5 k! g2 W0 }. n. c
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？, X* q) C3 M. B' J
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
( N/ a. u2 y8 Q/ ]: _; X1 @+ X; b3 G8 {$ V; S; U5 M/ p
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
% c/ T. l: X! Y: ^' \# p所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
: [( o/ m# |! L: ~: c明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
0 B( x+ c7 j; S) H$ E
( Z1 b8 O1 t1 }/ G/ b而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，9 @6 u/ {: A3 ~7 l
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
. h% {, j! |( B2 R$ I' d! V# Z亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，( L2 x' ~# v$ s, l$ q/ }* h' n
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，7 @/ ?+ g' U1 b! G  a! q8 `8 D
M 都可算壞了。7 D, A8 m7 L( y8 G) L7 I
4 f9 I8 H5 p+ C. j
F 呢個人仲掂，+ k9 A/ E0 v9 K! T( S4 A3 d
知道既唔等於要講，. ~' C% ^6 m" }
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. j+ k$ K. r7 q6 S% V# ^1 ]我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。0 _7 M, v5 ^) g! E

# \% D4 [; x* r- a6 c) ^3 W最衰個個緊係 S 啦，- u& g1 x9 w9 \# J8 E. F9 w/ q" j
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。9 Q. ]1 t4 v! X  C: k
1 D2 N6 d% E+ m" t% J
9 w- p5 v. e; }- }$ j8 I9 |
( E, t9 I4 J. ?! Y4 \5 V: J$ y
題外話：
  U; F0 \) U7 _# E* U  j2 |3 O/ q唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
$ [7 g# P& v1 j, r睇到 S 呢條友，
4 d* p* ^2 `( Z% E: o) y* f5 q: L我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L2 X7 `$ W. K& W

: O% s+ E: A' ]9 T' [4 LS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!* E$ B: G9 B0 [' ~
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
* p1 ~( F" }+ l) JM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她9 T# O# T- L4 u( k# I3 l' @! V$ R# Y( D
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
# l1 B$ k) p+ k) `; [2 RL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...