 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.7 Z2 ]$ U9 q! f
0 S) n3 P# L/ ?/ f" o& u! K, P5 @8 ^' G0 x
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.5 ?4 Y7 k! P2 i' s9 q. e# B% o
. f$ k7 K# Q$ P! o" BIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
" s6 [/ I4 Q9 B/ O( A' y2 W! band that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him. P( b6 H0 o* F
- p2 v; ]7 C/ M2 o! A" w+ i
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險7 n& a+ j: D+ Y7 A7 P
; x& o. N- j! c. h2 k H+ t
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
% K; S' \2 l6 w. j+ Sat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|