奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
% P( Q! H$ D6 k0 P2 |0 [
* @. p- {* `5 a/ q# Z0 kagree,+ ~$ ^! B. l; U1 o# E
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
5 G0 I7 q. a, M2 b但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
4 j% z  N% o3 o( v6 i8 ]7 l期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

  \0 V4 Y; I3 L: A% fhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
0 w- t/ N  H# Z; [已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地  ?+ X, ~3 k( t, @. H( N
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
0 T( e/ ^! T- P$ f4 s% Y6 wJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:# v9 G, G+ Z0 ~% ^6 |
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
# S4 j: X: w- w6 W( `" K4 P8 _' ~$ ?) c5 F( M1 \+ F
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???) |& ?  Z5 B# G  @2 M/ k
2 b5 ~7 O2 {$ r2 p& U
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

' ]5 }7 C. x# P- [# Y! C0 Z+ b

& K8 T* c6 |4 {1 |* D4 p絕對支持啦
+ W! q/ O4 Q# q, ~$ f( |, Q' j1 c+ C5 W8 m: ^/ C9 ~- `9 h
有錯就認,打就企定
0 Z; b( t* |& W
8 N& s' U& T, y- x8 b  s. k無錯當然要撐到底
+ P& u! E1 l0 K. S: K( I* S1 l, _: W! T% s
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩8 ~. [& r3 X/ G7 ?0 S7 X3 @, c  _

: W# B; c$ h$ e; `4 ?在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得! t: a! o& g: _) M/ f
& a+ g6 P  g. u9 k9 v) w1 v' p4 ^
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
$ g, {! l0 g: u
: L. P! {! O% i% c' {我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
+ P7 W5 X% x, B. l6 L5 S# M1 C( |8 U2 N# T. a
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
6 b+ L. c$ ?& I# j2 {8 [* V
2 Z; A5 P6 G4 c, g( Q; O0 |% D我唔認為lor
# K: x2 k) R# F* H+ v+ \0 M/ K$ ^* c. r/ R6 ?0 g- p/ M( S) _+ m+ }
唔係話要整死佢地' P/ u: k* M! z: A  H/ K% k

, y2 V: B4 ^1 T而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
8 C4 v2 u7 c2 C% f# @# F  Y- @6 L
8 J; k! S7 L7 c4 s$ s0 Y我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大0 o5 I. O7 @9 b6 B

4 k1 v$ ]2 m' v+ w+ _% i7 [8 p有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的, R- e$ O" o6 Q) h

8 w; G3 w  v* F" [3 ~) c0 \# t4 j. ?. T  S唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由# L6 _! j6 T! e$ o9 w5 ]& }$ G5 B
' r- f1 P# O0 k+ u: q
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
, L5 W6 O( M7 x6 a"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"! h9 Z; @+ n$ P  [$ H7 f/ W; _  I. g6 q
' `) z+ H9 M+ F+ t3 \. a
我們的大學生2 v- \" _6 Y3 p. I+ u7 m' b
" w% e: l2 W: p- p: P! B
- h8 ~; d0 S$ V2 C1 w+ r" j+ F

: M. j9 l* Y+ X  W
! h5 s9 S5 _, e

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:1 j( _; }; Y) p1 D5 v5 U  \0 r
, a+ O" _6 }6 X3 y8 Z0 A  `5 Y7 @7 h% U6 C
1 N( |" N+ b, f' T" l  Z- B
有見地 !!!
& j" [7 c/ e0 t- G現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html3 O& ]& s  Q6 ]7 j5 R/ ]

$ p9 m# G8 x8 l% X. m7 f" lI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. & ~' z! c: ?7 O5 _* K
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
8 Y8 `) C: J+ U( E+ b; }' DI pretty sad that about the University official.
( }! F9 C* D7 \9 t4 D& `It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la+ N" `2 R: D1 X: R8 ~& V# l, P

. `. `$ m3 |) s0 I[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:# W2 e( E3 H3 U. f
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
/ s) i; B- o5 Z. B
- P6 B2 g( W5 n1 D: |8 X[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

0 H- s  {+ I  F3 @6 ]5 B: p1 m7 s

. b  X8 \% {/ D3 |兩者有何分別?7 ~, q& b+ ^) _5 ^7 a4 r6 W
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?