奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
( s( |: }" j9 z. Z* B% Q8 ^$ `; N# v4 G* |8 E
agree,
2 ~6 z, ~( a) Q* l# P我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,# \8 e0 s) I3 a+ q. |9 U
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,) X" c) n1 i$ S' m; ^: p
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' V1 G0 n3 G2 B' |http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  ?1 k. g) n4 ?" X
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
7 N- |' C1 f3 t' x0 Z1 d0 W3 U6 Y2 K* ]搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.( I6 h0 ]* Q% Q
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:6 n% z$ z* p, k0 A$ ^/ a9 S* d$ ^
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
) C: B' s4 o* a3 V/ k0 r( a- b
& D& S% w: p1 U/ C" P係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
( S& X" N& _7 ]& b% v2 D/ J
' v6 ^, f9 f$ N5 v  [1 `0 v0 o! E為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ _/ X4 a& B% e9 s4 y; s* P/ g

0 M; a" e& S+ x* t0 s絕對支持啦- K+ T" b+ {  l3 w. u

% }8 z9 o1 ^$ Y. g8 O7 s" `& V: ~有錯就認,打就企定
" q; H2 K! H# |$ z/ e% D+ U! i2 s- E
無錯當然要撐到底
- V/ e6 g; j3 }! G- v
3 v* m. x6 x  L  _7 c+ J但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩' T, f8 Q4 D9 ?2 D3 m" T
6 l) a, O3 v6 F$ t
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
2 z. D: Q4 j4 j0 E2 V9 W
" w9 D: d* v, i; G8 z- T一份公眾讀物係好有影響力. `6 p( Y9 N4 ]/ ]

( r! v+ x* ~$ G% G我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生7 ~  E0 T& X3 q. W# O
& l! `) [# O! q' O
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?6 V$ E) o! k' G1 |
* ~' y9 c4 |# R' e
我唔認為lor0 w- Q1 v4 a* h
( n0 ]* B# e/ q6 j- y3 _
唔係話要整死佢地5 ?: R7 A1 ~3 _% N+ Y# G
4 m  u7 E* k4 e
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
7 S8 l" [0 j8 f3 A/ C! P
3 D: G8 x' X) {6 `( M) |8 w+ m我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
6 O; I. d+ S9 h! X
/ ~3 g( U; u  E; g! O: ^/ C有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的/ ?) ]; D4 |3 C* d" F8 Y
3 Q: H+ `& g7 \4 Z
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由0 L  R1 }" T& b5 M" ^
0 b/ z0 k( x; \2 s. h- ~
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
9 a; p$ w+ j  j4 f$ {"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
+ w8 e( c1 B' |1 y! }+ ]" R& e/ b+ h3 y( f! I; S- Q7 L
我們的大學生
6 ^8 }4 I4 l1 P0 D* y# @) T! |* e* Q

1 j9 V( N- U+ `! j/ I4 ]: ~2 H( g

/ t: E8 F) `4 b/ K4 U+ W( x

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:' J& ~$ p" O3 ^

) Y# ^( ^5 r# i7 z* P" f
5 P* o( [' K, B4 ?有見地 !!!/ T& D8 ^/ G/ f9 y- ]; I
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html+ m+ ?, }# ~: G! l4 X) L/ Y: L

/ {# r* L9 E( ^1 H8 gI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. - r& V$ G9 R" _
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
- o& \7 G  z" w# gI pretty sad that about the University official.% t" M0 T& J+ G1 U$ `  c
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la7 `- o2 l: q& t8 q: m
' b" X/ y3 Q! [8 R* X; y' _. I
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
5 i( T- z' u9 s& S+ Y! C" N我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: v0 \$ V/ A) q/ s1 }' ]+ A% p6 g- F4 z/ k7 [& g& H% E
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

: Q9 i/ [# m, [9 c1 ]7 k9 u

  D7 Y4 J1 p* _' K% Y. Y) W兩者有何分別?  H5 a2 i+ u' T1 P# b9 {3 G
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?