奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
. @6 I( s- u; c
0 N2 o& Q, j9 {. W; k" Zagree,
6 B% P4 P! y- N9 _0 v& g. l% E: v我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
' d: v/ \9 l% w# C" \1 n' Z但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
& B. z1 N4 J5 H4 s% _1 ^3 P期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' U2 @9 C0 R$ z% b" B' w. B0 [, h5 ^
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html& l8 j2 o6 t% Q. M3 v2 ?/ n
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
3 x2 B% {8 ?# M" [. }; h' K; y搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.3 `8 Y2 D$ r. L' Z; M3 H
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:! Q. D1 c: q- Q2 L( H8 w
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
+ _5 ]' L# N$ {3 T- V8 S; `( Q, B# z  p% W& w% W, o- j
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???( l6 Z7 `% S* T1 o

; N: S; u" T2 K8 m" C為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 Z$ L& ~$ h5 F) f4 Q, L* E9 s# C( @* o$ `' U8 e/ W
絕對支持啦
. D6 K$ m2 ?1 t, l5 P, O# Y& T% X' E+ e- ~5 n' P1 w
有錯就認,打就企定
2 D) z0 B9 e0 Z& P
- \2 ~! Q& X# N, G4 P4 f% _無錯當然要撐到底- g. ~. X. g: D' Q! }: B, I

% D9 @- I+ P7 w但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
. I. n+ `& ^% y7 q) L% g" `$ L* v& W: Y1 u$ E
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
* H0 L9 S1 k, d
3 ^+ J: {1 X# p一份公眾讀物係好有影響力% r7 k3 @( ]2 ^. _) C
! H0 ^: c- ]4 X( f3 ~
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生: S7 ~' N2 |( `9 I' b( _; X
* A/ J2 ^! S' Q: A7 ^: h* g" r
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
1 E7 g  s0 G9 f0 w4 O. D
2 z1 h, u1 u7 {( j2 |- {我唔認為lor$ |. f1 c& @3 g  @3 w% `

% W' g: H2 H4 x: M0 w- A4 {% u- u+ i唔係話要整死佢地" d3 \8 I% S: d7 r0 ]

: S  u9 c9 u  ^2 V5 b而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
- d) t5 c  m" i% I& @+ n+ h0 |% G/ S% Z0 {/ J3 T4 r% A* ~/ L
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
3 ]/ ]) D" C4 p2 h) D
  V0 I- p% o* B有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的2 s" A0 N$ B" A$ R& j- O
: G4 F# U# K3 F9 g
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
2 y( D( `* \, E, o6 E4 e6 ^! p- z5 z5 h  S, z
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句! Q3 E6 m6 q% k; r+ I+ n
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"3 d# Z5 w, G0 w+ `5 T) v
# t, G; U1 w3 P6 {  z
我們的大學生5 T) N) r  S( S  ]; G! \
; }9 }) W) P% ~
# s5 s( W% x- Y  V3 r' y4 O
$ L) J! u8 ]7 P# i0 Y+ x! A9 h
/ Y4 ^, k# c( ]

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:# m2 X4 H0 F7 Q- U9 b9 j2 i
* }' @# Q# M$ Y( U9 t* d
/ @; A* z( e: I3 i' i- z2 b
有見地 !!!( h; ], b) ^; I: }& k/ K; t) m
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
6 f% \$ z" M- v% P$ N2 W5 j. K, @8 d1 G8 C1 r
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
% m# C7 C5 F2 DI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
+ T& Y, B5 g9 g, L, GI pretty sad that about the University official.8 h6 }5 x8 m5 G
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
2 I  L# F) V2 E+ q: _3 n0 {! A" \0 b% f- f' p
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:0 z% H) d& P8 f& n. i' m) w% l
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ D5 D6 @9 O* r/ S( q" e5 T7 O
! F6 s  {+ k. k& j1 P4 z9 \( y- ~[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

7 n+ C( N6 X' v, t% s& S
7 i8 C5 \. i5 ^! |2 v兩者有何分別?9 D/ m# w. q2 ~8 _
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?