奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:, g4 N6 q, I( T: W! y+ i5 }" o( J% `
3 q( ]1 D) e9 P1 D" Q
agree,) @$ D+ s+ K5 _4 Z( j+ H
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,4 Y% [6 B  o+ n0 {
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
% U& F6 D$ O4 E$ o' p期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: t/ ]( _1 ^4 x$ K$ ]0 T/ o4 M
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& r' V6 L" b" G3 l) i( \$ {已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地% a7 q/ P& @7 u2 b
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
, L4 B* K# L5 H* \+ NJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
5 m: p, g2 v. Q1 ~. \! q有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
+ d4 w3 r: v% Q9 Q
- }  ]1 [* y" p; z係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???9 ]$ Z( ~9 N/ |9 H

. t8 d& f( g/ ]. e/ P  T為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

6 }5 Q, H" v8 D3 H6 t
* M) p9 m$ Q( m( o- g0 u/ }5 T; e- J7 U絕對支持啦
7 D1 \, E$ b) j: a& Q& r! ]2 f
& B5 u9 X: p* c* G( Q0 a/ L) ~有錯就認,打就企定
& ?0 U, R5 Y3 a, k0 N! |) |0 ?- G; p$ A0 v) h
無錯當然要撐到底. m8 @: U8 T* r8 O7 z; @, M
. N* F3 u% n7 x  W& c3 L* @$ }
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
7 m6 n- X3 I0 R" J' h0 U; m
/ ]7 }7 a9 n9 X1 i在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
% @" K% M. T$ B! j; z- j% t* k& ^7 [4 A- n- {1 g8 `
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力* Y7 [/ y, z# d3 w  `

. E# ]8 o! m' m+ h' D. V9 f+ j我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生; E8 |% P! g) r6 O
$ Y6 k6 m7 I7 R5 D5 q
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
( r) `; A. D: z, H3 d) b. e& o/ v* t" \5 M
我唔認為lor
" Q( c: p' T, Z1 c. L# Q( C- G- F8 j% w/ j
唔係話要整死佢地8 `# L) s5 t5 b1 u8 f
- L6 B( \5 ]2 D+ t
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用# R6 V7 p; y# E4 R% X' Z; S0 [
' p8 |/ Q/ b! S) V6 ~% B" N
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大$ G! w  |9 Y/ }0 E/ O) O
$ I; @8 h# Z3 Y( }
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
% Y( D1 J; e0 ]8 g+ c9 w, C2 F
* |+ R6 I$ u+ }) E6 z) @2 T6 ~唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
" q( H: m7 Q; d, F7 c7 I$ K2 b' [) d+ v* {1 a/ G- b8 @
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
$ X2 J3 f! G) k$ r5 ~4 F9 B"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
: t9 k. B* G7 C. [; Y
; e" x: @1 }# \  X  |7 H我們的大學生+ z9 _  l' z  W# N* D9 l
3 Z" c* k& k1 l5 _% q  ~
0 F7 ~3 E' h4 O/ o0 @6 O/ m) e

% ?% [6 d2 r# y) h5 O+ t3 b
& o; k5 y$ b* Z( d2 w( M) W$ x

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:" o  W- z3 Q; T( T2 Q; Q& Z
/ H! |' a  }" [% N+ O' w/ J

: ~, P" D; R* c! }3 X有見地 !!!
! V5 o8 m0 d8 m現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
' a3 B9 r6 G. E5 K8 M9 b* D  C" i6 O& l9 k, D& `
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ( Q  y+ u* T. _% d9 ?) S7 Z/ r
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
5 a4 B6 i* Y/ R" V2 {  yI pretty sad that about the University official.
. X. J  B* i9 bIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
/ y! ?9 s5 P! O% L0 `% |3 ]3 o2 o/ P5 l$ a. s* O$ Z$ I, w
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:5 z1 g% C  M2 K' r( s/ Y) r
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la! X/ ?  Q% X6 n. k  ~9 [% S
' Q* m) h( i, ~" X" O
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 v; n, Y+ [* W; O0 w. z3 \/ l0 t; A, W7 U. `
兩者有何分別?
! ?2 t, x" G( c( ?5 ~" B5 q中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?