奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:! g5 B+ y! I8 v

: K' q" c& K) u  X6 Oagree,0 V8 M' W& ~2 j
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
7 i) B* `% b: W8 q- |但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
! b: d0 E, K3 @$ X期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% m+ |" |/ E, y- D& W
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html  z! P4 W! ~1 ]6 p( T
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地2 o. y: o1 @/ F6 G1 Z1 j+ S, s7 @
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.1 l% i& X2 A( b7 T
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
& m/ E" i4 k+ @% m有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
1 _5 f4 E& }4 V& L7 j/ q0 K  Q, h( m8 w6 b  y
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???3 d3 J: v- O# ?* ]& E% _
, F  Z* T; h2 K
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

. k# R8 U( L% X+ Z' q$ [2 m

$ z3 \; g) U( G* ~8 w) c絕對支持啦5 b/ K- j, P$ d/ q+ g5 ?6 \  j
  H$ Y4 B6 F6 c4 R! P9 E( s- S3 U
有錯就認,打就企定
  f: h$ V, J( Z9 [) l" S5 g4 `& g* y( ^) d* K/ R& i) p
無錯當然要撐到底
8 J8 t) M* r* b( [1 i' o$ E1 t$ C- y! G5 B+ P
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
9 k5 J. t' G8 }9 @; z7 N) `; P9 |0 }# X( @% e: H
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
) ]$ E: a2 f6 f. g. w3 G1 G
/ x  M  p( C$ P/ s0 o一份公眾讀物係好有影響力. Z0 t, m" z7 P: K1 B4 @. W$ u
. S- X& x( g! J3 Q/ C% v( w) G- h! C
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生9 Y# @0 @( g/ i1 s4 C9 n% {
* v# ]# v6 e( D/ ]# P) K. K( L
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?3 T3 ~* x0 N) V  C

8 n# E2 Q' y' k6 T% D; f% T我唔認為lor
. N0 J2 j. C" H
/ R* n: u" B$ f$ a$ _唔係話要整死佢地
$ `, o: `6 @6 l' _% D# n3 f( O5 Z4 A' S- d0 P* D
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
: e0 @' D. A% \. q' N, w9 W, a+ ^2 S9 w6 a2 m$ g
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大4 B/ m" l2 H0 N3 n- S

# j8 l' j3 A% D' c有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的( v* o1 L6 i" k4 k" {

3 m0 _" ~% I6 [# G唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
5 [1 `/ f/ i7 _! W# e
+ r2 r$ \# ~4 ^+ v1 m' F大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句' k+ q* ?8 `% b, M; p* E4 C
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"# j+ y! _% X& U5 @

4 [7 c3 I5 y  i: ^5 i我們的大學生
7 T( e% M9 I1 o
* S9 U) ?( b2 |3 j6 a# ^, T; |4 K& c7 f7 l; R
( j. E" W9 |8 ~4 n( s# Y: I
1 G, r" a& M) {6 o

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
7 Q( T3 q) u" Y) p4 S- W% g, w) P/ d" _7 M4 n' E
0 P' Z* G6 W, D/ f# @
有見地 !!!) i2 k  g/ {" d7 M+ r" t; ~* j
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html" G& J) N% }# r2 a3 r% `# L& h; z- P
) O, g6 R! J' }; o, E
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
& @+ l* e4 i9 j! cI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
; ^6 A6 u- P; n8 R+ O7 L( GI pretty sad that about the University official.) a+ l' K: f! g5 s+ `
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 M% K) h* Z! ?# \( f! [+ q- S2 L
% t% [' b- h' C& h  ?+ B! U2 O, _* [[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:* n  x# T8 h7 s" X; w
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* t& s# I9 z& ?' B) F- ^' {! @/ h5 v) ^) r# x
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 L- g* S1 f1 R! n: ]! S5 n1 ^
# [9 n6 Y, i1 S9 h0 ]* F兩者有何分別?
- q! h2 c, p' Y中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?