奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, h# }1 ?! c/ k: T
) X( m# s; \' x4 T% n3 M6 Gagree,
; ?: y8 j$ k/ n6 S1 S, K: i+ S我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,$ Q. _' W3 j0 T# D) x
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
: o% h$ \8 p& @- }. f期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

( j  B) ]6 I4 G* Qhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
# x5 P9 k3 s% s7 w, N3 J7 e8 P已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地  i9 G0 L7 w6 B0 S4 D
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.$ B( @' K* o4 |; o
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:+ Z: L; b: `( k5 b! _' N- y4 q: Q
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
8 k3 o5 |4 j! t8 b# R# T4 q& ~) E* d4 x! X+ B8 B
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???5 q' i# A. h7 S2 E' }. @7 C

& M4 |( n0 _' q- Q為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

$ k# D1 e) e! w$ {1 Y

: l& i* Z1 ?- D* l絕對支持啦( l! B; x9 g; Q  H; @* p

7 y3 `# r2 p. L; k有錯就認,打就企定, {, q5 `" E% h  g7 q

, e1 G' w4 \1 a  _& C1 e' o無錯當然要撐到底9 _" N; S+ s# \- M1 ?

8 ^* `9 W4 N3 e4 R但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩5 `( v. o9 ?$ k
6 [5 Z/ |/ J% c* }; _$ P. i. z
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得! ~9 b3 Y& S0 v; E, \4 _
- m# F$ k  _3 V8 P! e
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 A" _3 W5 a4 i) p1 v' g
  B8 u/ ~# }) G1 b% z6 o( g/ \
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生) j1 Q1 E3 x  y( T# u  W
. w, a/ a5 ?0 f# B3 U# X' |7 X/ U' G
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
/ x: W: P# w; L4 N% }4 r1 L; {' E! w5 V5 {! U0 _" v
我唔認為lor
! d; T; `: d/ [7 v1 d8 p) v* w/ w  g
唔係話要整死佢地
  j% C) C2 t1 {# b% V/ z8 _& j+ M  J
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用, ^  @! m- C, e- U0 s

! C$ q; H) v& O2 h我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! T$ S+ y! s; X! q! K
" ~( i9 Q( i7 M# A) h
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的7 Z- c' g  ^2 X/ d$ Z9 {; r7 D. K

8 T2 b# E* _# t2 M2 E5 j唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由: G# ^6 u* F$ p# S; ^1 n" ^

  M; s$ }  W+ P大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句. T, ^+ Y# D6 ?9 H: P1 e3 B9 c+ U) H% O
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
5 O8 B2 d2 J  {* S& v5 \1 Q" o' G8 q5 P8 u
我們的大學生! w9 J6 g! w2 T
* p  o6 A8 m6 G( l- Q* w$ C8 q2 H9 f% {
& @' n+ _, L+ Q( h

% n; ~/ S1 Z# V- L; W, v7 A
  O6 u2 q! N# Y/ H6 U; n* r

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
/ {. Y& a6 `, [8 T2 l0 }
! {8 g9 s$ l7 R& k2 |: I% D( q% @( g
有見地 !!!
# R' D  }4 b# b; Q現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
1 V5 C+ W, D$ u! B5 j
+ C- v% s+ W- `+ `2 G$ LI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. / R  P) r5 H- N; M$ ?$ M* @& u" ]
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. % i* R( ^8 h; M) z
I pretty sad that about the University official." _: Z0 ]' a' B; d, ^
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la' @4 @& r. I0 Q9 }

$ D0 i7 g' G5 z8 M. [; b[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:* U0 }- r! K) R' C
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
  w) c/ y: \3 E8 T( j$ n6 F1 x
$ d% O) s: G2 N/ A) B[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

/ _8 [' e3 [! x+ ~. _2 l' w
3 [$ S/ o, Y2 T' d% a& @/ f' P兩者有何分別?
9 ^: S0 Z  k9 J8 u中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?