奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:% G: H2 g" \5 K' o
! j6 _% s' N8 }, _0 A3 h! i$ u
agree,5 H6 P$ S* w/ p' V  D* L
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
. \" s& y: \: N  w( ]但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,& _' H. M! U1 W; }, Z* {
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; |) \  h5 u* N8 _7 m  P  [http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html5 c, O+ w2 Z; P
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
% I, l$ `5 [6 ~% H. p' ~# s% X搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
; X( v1 P& v  {Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
+ d  y) Z' X" C' B有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
; [1 ?" Y: m5 W" U/ i" q- a9 [* p4 [
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???0 ?: w% n7 Q2 T
3 _: p9 j( S" n9 D' [# i% j( l- q
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

& F% w4 p( K) ?6 [
; x2 h( A: H( }8 e
絕對支持啦+ ^! n: A2 @: `: x3 B1 p) k

, @) E$ C, }. U* b0 e& ~有錯就認,打就企定
" c* k5 Y, Q1 A+ z' R; P, I
2 b# @* i7 N! i, w# d2 m1 ]3 i" t無錯當然要撐到底
3 \4 r5 V: J$ P) b  ^$ {3 W( J6 c3 U# u/ E7 X4 w; `& y1 G/ n
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩# c' j6 V  K/ `( U$ t0 ^+ A
; l8 w$ [! l# r* b3 W
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得( D& X5 X( D% e. m  R3 T) e/ n& a
9 X" ?( P/ t: a
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力9 K: Q7 v( c# U& |( d- Y
5 C. o1 y. S+ h3 S* P( Z( E0 H
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
) F' o" J6 \# u, a
. H8 O+ t3 g% M& |$ B6 Z唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
1 W; O) \! O6 X7 ^( B7 f2 w/ t" ]8 m
我唔認為lor
* T7 }& p- c( I' a8 M( `9 q4 e. Q  B
唔係話要整死佢地
/ y% R$ j# c5 e9 R
3 S# a( R) L& n而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
# M5 F4 M8 J' m" Z' _) m3 C& l3 _' {( W) q
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
8 O) d, V$ s9 O* `+ S0 ^, j; X9 r: D0 s3 U
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
, J. y/ Y5 @7 N$ \) g0 V, E
  t5 g& a0 F2 K9 ^唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由+ g* U. A% Y0 \/ |3 {

& ?# }* |) E6 H+ q) s% E大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句9 \, `& R* Y& x
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
& D: Q* L* Z" n1 C- Y  ]
9 z2 S6 k  \5 ]0 {; z, D我們的大學生0 f3 P4 a' d5 j: A6 z% k
" r- `6 V6 U' u9 M9 d
4 z% M3 }1 ~  f) [$ J! P
" W7 b( {$ i3 J( F! X6 X2 l
8 Y, W: G* E3 m; y6 L; A) P

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
9 T% I6 r; q) s+ n/ A6 m3 r0 |' V

6 [! w: L. e8 ~) X( g有見地 !!!* O' w' {% r: `9 \; R! w" n
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& \/ Y3 Y4 @( I) |
! `: ]1 f7 [5 Q2 F# FI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
$ Z6 L6 n; y! TI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 0 F- A7 Q3 x0 e% ~) k, n/ \
I pretty sad that about the University official.
& T  ], T/ M  ?$ z: W2 ^It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
' W) f0 _5 ]" l! J4 X0 H
& B; S/ o6 {/ @1 [5 Y[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
! F& X9 \: Q3 J5 Z. _; N1 H7 n( A我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la4 j4 F" Z* h' O4 ^8 I: E$ ?

* M4 X0 z) u/ _; g: L[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

: N" X* z! L& @: q, H

# ^0 [8 X' s# p+ g6 K- S兩者有何分別?* r- n) o& R3 v, J; W3 n- ~3 ?
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?