Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:6 z4 u  A" u( n4 x! ^' j
3 K- z; p' j* D& I( O; s) c
) m1 C% o  p% _+ G8 H5 j& {+ _
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* f1 F  @. Z! Y: \" U
5 c) i! c1 m, |
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:1 F; u0 m; Z/ m

* ], P$ m& q1 K5 v9 o7 z! i, @9 p- G- v! I6 D) Y3 q3 e3 ~
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  d) U/ ?& _8 J9 S1 ~4 |! }; l8 K
oh really...
9 W4 S3 e3 F& B  u, h$ d8 g7 ]5 e; [2 jhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
+ A" C0 B, W! {+ P+ j0 Ii didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題" c# U3 t1 T9 @6 v( M  c- w. z

- q) X2 @. G  \% `當然這是個假設性問題
/ D; Z) J4 Q+ C, J3 ^' N" ^但將人數倍大
' {" e& Z; O) E; g例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個- F& P% b% m( M% s+ [9 `: B
(情況可以換作其他)2 n! r: I( e# G; Z* Y! q3 S; h' J
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
+ l( W8 W2 ^2 F* z/ F) z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
4 u9 }5 q2 {: R/ \如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:+ B& k) i& S. h3 i  A
絕情谷既問題...$ H6 E: u8 ^4 o4 K2 |' x1 m4 X3 Y
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." W& q1 `8 c# [! T* g7 m
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 C- @5 T$ B! i* Z1 S
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好3 g; H+ A1 Z1 ~. {3 j8 |2 ~% r
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
" d$ y) g, f+ H) U/ P但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
& e( A/ |" K2 [& K4 r( G好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢$ l) H9 H6 R& n9 Q1 @1 {+ e& W2 N  C7 D
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
3 o" D1 {0 J- R( A$ |+ X: W' {" J& T3 U" B4 @- c7 m
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命. O4 ?$ m. D' q. v
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
8 F" |5 s/ N+ y其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# g0 M, }; g' o# l* J0 E; R

6 z5 W5 X4 o4 R. _+ Phaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣" m3 t' c* N1 p: u2 {$ O
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....3 L5 v( G0 M7 q3 E8 G3 G
  I# ]% j9 A- t: w/ ?, u, w
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
) F: Y' f! k. Z0 C! i: Q5 ]yes, my reason is helping more
# u( [1 ?1 @6 c: h2 s7 c. Hfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
3 S# V2 W5 @9 M5 z5 A; M* Y' y( Rif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child$ R5 U( p/ r  a
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
! g! Y/ i: r3 P8 p, j$ n/ lalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
$ S' R5 A) \1 @" n! [7 i7 Tmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!( [8 c2 n# Z: r2 ~+ P+ {. w8 v3 t3 S
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 I. z) d! ^3 Y; A
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~: L$ k; b8 b9 m& I2 p9 G" X1 b
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
3 F/ G5 Z4 g( |1 _  A正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
8 i9 v- z) @. F( }! D1 J; F即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~+ Q+ A2 m' N1 d
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
, A2 T3 Y8 U3 b1 J' D0 J1 [  J但如果o係當時o既情況中~~* _1 x1 b& n  [6 m
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）