Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
! b& ^) Z* d2 @4 `. B1 y
) P( P7 w% I) N0 F! D( p5 I& |# X, @9 I0 c: {7 q
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 Q% `$ w/ F/ n1 }# s1 G! x, J0 [3 f
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
* b. Q. P0 W# d1 Q+ E9 T
; g* z0 t# E: j2 W  ~- R- Z
7 O. h# d! n0 m; z5 w* eIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ Q# c$ Z! z' p# \  v2 i8 [+ d: n$ c0 x/ e* H' l8 C
oh really...
; L* S  _+ `$ [0 Ahahhaa, thx a lot^^"
/ e# Q  S' X+ C0 E* a. ?- ni didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
5 O% S4 o1 M& N. H( c; Q0 K' E2 W6 f; g: W) G* b; _6 Q8 z. l, [( y
當然這是個假設性問題( I) \& A+ F& C
但將人數倍大
: X+ A+ C# n3 G# ]- \' S例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
& q9 `. F, {- R8 j(情況可以換作其他)8 ^' m# K) v1 w4 Z, t. [; {8 F
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...* P; o$ j5 Y8 C; J% L
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...0 N; H+ [1 w( I; G( P* q0 S) ~
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
2 h& }$ Z( @$ Y8 D2 D. A: O絕情谷既問題...0 ^9 Q- ?* y/ e+ C1 w
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
9 j1 Z( [; T0 F/ o如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% t6 ?5 ?( s; V" O/ O: F殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好, r6 r( f! Y9 T6 I5 G3 \
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生8 M2 T: C3 S1 ?' I% N' X
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩! Y- {: ]" ^, n$ `3 J# n+ g
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢; q$ p& O$ `* R, @* e9 U
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢1 b- w  |2 W5 H2 g+ k

0 y' h7 V8 V+ k) j+ r0 r, }9 `我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命0 N; d6 E: q' U4 k. ?
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:1 T" U% e1 z/ J& _& W) c
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# l; P  x  @; T& T/ ~# y" @; s
7 N& G( A* x4 l, {" m: T3 S
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣' E0 M* f1 p7 L, W8 z
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
1 R3 i& ]1 C9 U6 o. d3 V8 T5 i, }: w! U! ]9 Q* U5 y9 ?9 [
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child! \- B+ ?7 m! h
yes, my reason is helping more1 o4 I% A; U# ^( A2 w  ]; F$ [* N
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!& r( Y& B6 S$ {1 S
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child; [/ I* k; j) x+ `: [8 g: R
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?" I0 q8 V$ J* o
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!" N5 ]3 m7 k/ M$ j' V- g
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
% X& F; P3 A6 f( Iunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~1 W' Q) v2 {  `/ b
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) k5 L! b! O8 U  L1 l
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~* P4 x, `2 e+ B! w+ Y
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
: F0 @4 X+ S7 v7 w, w- N; B即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
0 _# l5 X& V% u: C. Q: |. n4 y# O+ ^我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~6 ~' l! ?& l* J* w/ {0 F2 _5 B) E
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
/ c8 J  u+ ?! }/ ]' ^9 W我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）