Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
# g9 E$ c% N6 V8 D- [8 r+ ~9 }2 _" l8 C6 @8 b& p4 R' p/ s
9 b1 Y3 x) r7 M# c) Y* E3 Y5 i
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

3 k0 N( k$ q8 }5 q. M0 \7 r: \" X. K! Y
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:) C! x+ R$ i; }9 s6 l% B
9 u+ v! C- d( [' W9 z
, C# c4 `$ h" |1 W
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

3 I) R4 H! V8 X' Z5 [( o7 g3 A2 j5 {
oh really...8 ^/ P8 w/ ~% O7 |
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
3 B' q. G( e; V" x- Z* w+ d8 Si didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
$ x8 t. r% Q1 M
# R' N5 b, C5 C" X- t( {! _當然這是個假設性問題
$ }; y- _9 y9 z8 F$ u" Q7 R但將人數倍大
7 j+ c5 v& u/ @; u例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個7 y( t% \# V# ~" Y3 d2 i. |
(情況可以換作其他)
1 p  @( ^8 F1 H. j- \, |始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
. l9 y6 F8 T5 f2 w如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ [& f/ s- q& a, Q0 f" S  h# s: l如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:5 A$ K5 _/ l/ d6 C
絕情谷既問題...
3 |; E$ c! C: V$ c( U7 x. @如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
( X9 ^4 j5 s+ Y% S) ~, |9 |如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

9 X6 X2 R( r+ y& b# a  G% Y殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
, g, A: ]: ?/ P7 @- |於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生' F: E8 \5 P: M6 w3 V3 v0 N; w
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩; n/ J" h4 m, k- b
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢1 e7 D' T( i2 S$ h9 l% }6 M) `
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
( P* ^2 P" p; W3 ?0 H' b+ ?: h; B  h! f. u8 I
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
! o. M7 x# b  s  O: F# T) n5 V& c不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:/ P7 \/ C7 ]5 D' A) v% X
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

+ S0 T6 }& `4 |, T
1 n0 K" Z7 H' W: ?
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣1 y% S9 p( q8 G, u- \1 _! V# c+ {
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....0 |  U, }: A. V7 o
& Q9 r2 n) {) b' ]; |# X$ p& @
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
8 J0 _' f" q: {0 N( y+ Y: ryes, my reason is helping more2 g; k2 O1 O# ]2 f1 j3 w
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!& {7 W' {3 l( |6 E( d8 e3 s& n1 K
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
% K& [+ y$ K& c/ ]' C2 F# Cbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?2 L& E( J1 o; {3 A" T" |
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
2 Q' S7 P  p2 dmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!" Z% G. o2 d9 M$ @; T" [7 |, {
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
& ?, K5 x4 R- X; H, p, Y! k當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~0 \% W* P. M7 ?4 g! [
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~1 C. ]- q9 |2 _# L0 R9 q- `
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
: P0 u9 C' H( C; o; k即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~7 z4 \! p( X8 g0 K2 @
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
/ I8 v2 e/ p# I" x2 m% N( v% ~; ?但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
) M6 A- S# L, ?6 @0 w我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）