Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:( s  R0 h( z: |# `

& G% U+ [' b8 }+ z" f' Y$ n& a2 v/ }4 D+ B% o4 P3 E& w
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

/ K! E2 K# S) p; z) Q% E2 m

' Y8 m: O* G" c+ C# D' BIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:+ |0 F+ A; A0 E+ N) s; C
8 a/ n5 e( l6 F) q

1 j& X; Q7 z; S  \0 b, L" A5 A8 XIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

  T4 u6 }+ V2 u/ M  y& @8 b$ E) I9 y3 U( r1 d% o
oh really...
7 o3 E8 K* q7 `$ yhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
4 b' g. k& V" w  m/ o) `9 Vi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
9 @7 Z$ m$ E7 b$ t  M3 R
2 ^% f* c# O% L當然這是個假設性問題
  Y  Y+ J# p/ N但將人數倍大
. m& N5 S/ L: k  }- o例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個  q4 T6 V2 u2 Z! g
(情況可以換作其他)
7 E) T4 k( ]4 ?  h- _! _! _* K始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..." l7 q! s0 ~, V9 X
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
( e& M+ O$ O7 y' |" L6 Y4 b5 r" Y6 t8 O如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:4 y6 Z" d$ r0 }+ `
絕情谷既問題...
( A! z% S7 j7 c% |/ _) g  _如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
$ ?+ [( z! Y3 N. ]7 a0 c' V如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

! H4 }! B* W! {2 Y3 p! n$ x
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好! j3 ^! b" a5 k0 W
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生! p6 x. c3 R- a
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩2 t; L9 J  Q8 o; M1 M' r
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢1 @8 U. p+ F3 i' l0 d7 F
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢+ W& l1 _) e7 H. ~7 n

4 O3 x* f& ^$ t* P6 _% k, L我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命8 n0 K( f' r5 F% y' [* h+ L
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
6 p0 u8 c2 N$ S' i- Z其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

; c  F! W/ q7 t; z- |. K5 Q! O) n, D# K8 |5 F. L2 J
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
+ f* x9 d# j, }4 m  }4 y$ H/ {你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....; }( g9 _$ J- ^9 t

% U' g* v5 ^' Op.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
2 D# _+ |% m( c# X6 _; o7 c9 w) pyes, my reason is helping more
- l* r& I: \3 X- f' A2 _6 Gfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
& C$ w7 v6 A$ |  m) _! p6 r4 g8 ]3 Hif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
) F8 D; s, e( {+ Ibecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?6 q0 T* H- P! \6 G5 x  C
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
! r/ U: V4 A/ k+ H% D, amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
: v* F. }* G/ b1 x! x& B9 V3 v9 ]under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
" \, q. r9 ?) Q* k) I- g6 A8 T8 M當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~* D$ g$ w$ M' H% N. v8 q% Q
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- e/ V( k6 G7 X& u; C' ?3 [' l4 Z
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~& J$ t" }) W2 l5 b' G, B
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~" ]& k3 v! ^9 h7 Y7 ?- r
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
& j( {8 K6 U& Z( A. A4 }8 k: a+ z但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
4 b5 r: N1 S2 R我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）